SpaceX flight testing in South Texas
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 100
Likes: 10
From: Upminster UK.
SpaceX flight testing in South Texas
This is intended to be a new thread about the Boca Chica testing and development site in South Texas
I have started this separate SpaceX thread because this activity is a separate program from Falcon 9, and today also marks the 5th anniversary of the first successful Falcon 9 landing.
I have started this separate SpaceX thread because this activity is a separate program from Falcon 9, and today also marks the 5th anniversary of the first successful Falcon 9 landing.
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 100
Likes: 10
From: Upminster UK.
https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2020...eavy-ramps-up/
Article about the SN9 rollout, and stacking of SN10
Article about the SN9 rollout, and stacking of SN10
Joined: Jun 2009
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 650
From: florida
Salute!
You can see live TV of various locations at the Boca site, and there's a "discord.com" site that LabPadre will reference. The discusion forum is more like a chat than Pprune.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ky5l...ature=youtu.be
The You tube ref had good coverage of latest hop and covered movement of next Starship to the launch pad.
Not sure if the link wil get you to the LabPadre discussions but try it:
https://discord.com/channels/5779092...09263012462596
Gums sends...
You can see live TV of various locations at the Boca site, and there's a "discord.com" site that LabPadre will reference. The discusion forum is more like a chat than Pprune.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ky5l...ature=youtu.be
The You tube ref had good coverage of latest hop and covered movement of next Starship to the launch pad.
Not sure if the link wil get you to the LabPadre discussions but try it:
https://discord.com/channels/5779092...09263012462596
Gums sends...
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,662
Likes: 7,348
From: Peripatetic
https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/...h-launch-tower
SpaceX Plans to ‘Catch’ Super Heavy Rockets With Launch Tower
SpaceX Plans to ‘Catch’ Super Heavy Rockets With Launch Tower
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 100
Likes: 10
From: Upminster UK.
Joined: Sep 2015
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 663
Likes: 398
From: London
Anyone know where they're planning to land their first orbital flight(s)? The re-entry path for a Texas landing would be straight across Mexico, which doesn't seem the greatest idea for the first orbital re-entry of such a large/radical vehicle.
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 100
Likes: 10
From: Upminster UK.
Lots of discussion about things like this in the forums at nasaspaceflight.com
Joined: Feb 2002
Aviation Qualifications: AME
Posts: 4,182
Likes: 1,116
From: UK
The idea is to land the booster right on the launch pad, ready for a quick (1 hr according to Musk) turnround.
Similarly, the Starship itself needs to land close to the booster to allow a similar refuel and RTS. .
Similarly, the Starship itself needs to land close to the booster to allow a similar refuel and RTS. .
Joined: Sep 2015
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 663
Likes: 398
From: London
What I'm getting at is that there appears to be no orbit for which both launch and re-entry trajectories are over water. Launching over water from Texas and then returning from orbit to the same location seems to commit you to a re-entry path over land; that might not be an issue for a proven vehicle, but seems a bit of a risk for the first few orbital flights of a vehicle very different to any that's flown before. Look at what happened to Columbia; that didn't hurt anyone in the ground, but it could have done.
Joined: Feb 2002
Aviation Qualifications: AME
Posts: 4,182
Likes: 1,116
From: UK
Some of the musings ive read seem to indicate that the Starship re-entry profile will be substantially different to 'normal' parabolic reentry. I'm not an astrophysist or rocket scientist so ive no idea what that means. Stop dead and drop straight down perhaps? 
Anyway, a successful static fire of SN9 took place today and SN10 has received its nose cone. All moving along swiftly. Another launch Saturday maybe?
Anyway, a successful static fire of SN9 took place today and SN10 has received its nose cone. All moving along swiftly. Another launch Saturday maybe?
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 100
Likes: 10
From: Upminster UK.
NOTAMs updated.
https://tfr.faa.gov/tfr2/list.jsp
Possible dates now not earlier than Sunday 10th, with Monday and Tuesday as alternates.
https://tfr.faa.gov/save_pages/detail_1_1077.html
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 100
Likes: 10
From: Upminster UK.
There will be another Static Firing, no earlier than, NET, Monday 11th
Earliest possible flight date is now 12th January, with backups on 13th and 14th.
There were a couple of road closures for Static Firing in the last couple of days, but no engines were lit.
NOTAMs are here https://tfr.faa.gov/tfr2/list.jsp with an option to filter Texas or Space Operations, but I couldn't see any way to use multiple filters.
Earliest possible flight date is now 12th January, with backups on 13th and 14th.
There were a couple of road closures for Static Firing in the last couple of days, but no engines were lit.
NOTAMs are here https://tfr.faa.gov/tfr2/list.jsp with an option to filter Texas or Space Operations, but I couldn't see any way to use multiple filters.
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 100
Likes: 10
From: Upminster UK.
Static fire is still possible up to 0200 UTC on 13th, 20:00 CST 12th.
No firing was done yesterday, due to either SAR helicopter operations, power outage, or very strong winds.
TFRs have been added for one additional day.
Air Force One was also in South Texas earlier, so NOTAMs for that as well.
No firing was done yesterday, due to either SAR helicopter operations, power outage, or very strong winds.
TFRs have been added for one additional day.
Air Force One was also in South Texas earlier, so NOTAMs for that as well.