Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Space Flight and Operations
Reload this Page >

SpaceX flight testing in South Texas

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Space Flight and Operations News and Issues Following Space Flight, Testing, Operations and Professional Development

SpaceX flight testing in South Texas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th January 2026 | 08:01
  #1241 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Aviation Qualifications: Military (Retired)
Posts: 454
Likes: 134
From: Norfolk, UK
Musk commenting on their goals for Starship V4

Stretch goal for Starship V4 is 300 tons of thrust per engine with 33 engines, so 10,000 tons of total thrust.

That is 3 times the power of the Saturn V Moon rocket.
MostlyHarmless is offline  
Reply
Old 25th January 2026 | 10:48
  #1242 (permalink)  
Community Builder
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 1,165
From: Central UK
The numbers involved in rocketry are astonishing. 10,000 tons to lift 200.

No way is this a direct comparison of course but at that ratio a 747-400 would be able to carry a total load of about 20 pax with baggage...
meleagertoo is offline  
Reply
Old 25th January 2026 | 12:48
  #1243 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,662
Likes: 7,349
From: Peripatetic
Yeah, but the Starship, once in orbit, will be able to carry its its payload for a few million miles at over 17000mph without refuelling…..
ORAC is offline  
Reply
Old 26th January 2026 | 06:55
  #1244 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,662
Likes: 7,349
From: Peripatetic
NEWS: Elon Musk has announced that @SpaceX's next Starship launch will happen in 6 weeks (early March).

This will be the first launch of Starship version 3, including the debut of the Raptor V3 engine:
​​​​​​​.
• Almost 2x the thrust of Raptor 1,
• Costs 4x less,
• Much lighter. Will save 2,425 lbs of weight per engine, or 94,575 lbs (42.9 metric tons) per launch,
• No heat shield,
• Optimized for manufacturability.
ORAC is offline  
Reply
Old 26th January 2026 | 09:05
  #1245 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Aviation Qualifications: Military (Retired)
Posts: 454
Likes: 134
From: Norfolk, UK
Essentially a new vehicle - gong to be very exciting to watch!
MostlyHarmless is offline  
Reply
Old 26th January 2026 | 14:12
  #1246 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 282
Likes: 108
From: Germany
Originally Posted by ORAC
Yeah, but the Starship, once in orbit, will be able to carry its its payload for a few million miles at over 17000mph without refuelling…..
Just checking for that one red Tesla roadster ... since February 6, 2018

it travelled: 4006 million miles
which makes a fuel (RP1) efficiency of: 31795 MPG

source:
https://www.whereisroadster.com/

Last edited by 51bravo; 26th January 2026 at 14:23.
51bravo is offline  
Reply
Old 1st February 2026 | 12:23
  #1247 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,662
Likes: 7,349
From: Peripatetic
VideoUp close with Booster 19 rolling out to Massey's test site tonight for initial pressure and cryo proof testing in preparation for Starship test flight

​​​​​​​12. 2/1/26
ORAC is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd February 2026 | 01:08
  #1248 (permalink)  
10 Countries Visited
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 678
From: Within AM radio broadcast range of downtown Chicago
FAA SAFO re: Airspace Management with respect to Space Launch Activities

https://content.govdelivery.com/atta.../SAFO26001.pdf
WillowRun 6-3 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th February 2026 | 15:45
  #1249 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,662
Likes: 7,349
From: Peripatetic
​​​​​​​SpaceX has completed a partial cryogenic proof test of Super Heavy Booster 19 at its Massey's test site near Starbase, Texas.

Engineers rolled the booster out from production just two days earlier. The successful test now allows preparations to shift toward static fire testing.

​​​​​​​
ORAC is offline  
Reply
Old 8th February 2026 | 11:19
  #1250 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,662
Likes: 7,349
From: Peripatetic
VideoBooster 19 venting today during day 4 of cryogenic proof testing. ​​​​​​​
ORAC is offline  
Reply
Old 9th February 2026 | 22:14
  #1251 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,662
Likes: 7,349
From: Peripatetic
Booster 19 is returning to megabay 1 tonight after finishing cryogenic pressure and proof testing at Starbase Masseys test site over the past week.

Booster 19 will be inspected and have Raptor 3 engines and grid fins installed before rolling out to the new pad 2 for static fire testing.
ORAC is offline  
Reply
Old 17th February 2026 | 05:59
  #1252 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,662
Likes: 7,349
From: Peripatetic
The entire Starbase pad 2 water deluge system including the top deck was tested for the first time today.
Videos….
ORAC is offline  
Reply
Old 17th February 2026 | 07:25
  #1253 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Aviation Qualifications: Military (Retired)
Posts: 454
Likes: 134
From: Norfolk, UK
Getting close....
MostlyHarmless is offline  
Reply
Old 27th February 2026 | 05:29
  #1254 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,662
Likes: 7,349
From: Peripatetic
ElonStarship V3 SN1 headed for ground tests. I am highly confident that the V3 design will achieve full reusability.

Should note that SpaceX will only try to catch the ship with the tower after two perfect soft landings in the ocean.

The risk of the ship breaking up over land needs to be very low.



​​​​​​​

Last edited by ORAC; 27th February 2026 at 13:04.
ORAC is offline  
Reply
Old 4th March 2026 | 08:59
  #1255 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,662
Likes: 7,349
From: Peripatetic
Video
​​​​​​​Several views of Starship 39 during a 3rd night of cryogenic proof testing in preparation for upcoming Starship test flight 12.
ORAC is offline  
Reply
Old 7th March 2026 | 04:11
  #1256 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,662
Likes: 7,349
From: Peripatetic
Road closures have been posted closing Boca Chica beach and Hwy 4 for potential Booster 19 static fire testing. If so, this will be the first static fire testing from the new Starbase pad 2 and first Version 3 booster static fire with 33 new Raptor 3 engines.

https://www.starbase.texas.gov/beach-road-access
ORAC is offline  
Reply
Old 8th March 2026 | 06:40
  #1257 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,662
Likes: 7,349
From: Peripatetic
Cryotesting complete, first V3 flight within a month.

Does seem a long time since the last flight, hopefully the tempo will pick up quickly this year.

​​​​​​​Ship 39 cryoproof operations complete, the first campaign with a next generation Starship V3.

Across several days, engineers tested the vehicle’s redesigned propellant system and its structural strength, including squeeze tests to mimic the forces of future ship catches.



​​​​​​​
ORAC is offline  
Reply
Old 8th March 2026 | 12:00
  #1258 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,662
Likes: 7,349
From: Peripatetic
Videos

Super Heavy B19 rolling to pad ahead of first V3 static fire.
Starship Flight 12: Booster 19 rollout to Pad 2 for Static Fire testing. It has Raptor 3's, if not the full set of 33.
ORAC is offline  
Reply
Old 10th March 2026 | 22:05
  #1259 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2025
Aviation Qualifications: SLF
Posts: 9
Likes: 15
From: italy
It’s incredible to see how much has changed since that first Falcon 9 landing 5 years ago. What SpaceX is doing in Boca Chica is a fascinating case study for anyone interested in Safety Management Systems (SMS).

Traditional aviation safety is built on 'Preservation'—preventing any failure at all costs. SpaceX, however, uses an 'Iterative Failure' model. From an SRM perspective, they aren't ignoring risks; they are simply moving the 'Acceptable Level of Safety' (ALoS) boundary. They treat a prototype explosion not as a safety breach, but as a high-speed data collection event.

The real challenge for the industry moving forward will be: how do we integrate this kind of 'Rapid Prototyping' safety culture into traditional operations without compromising public safety? The data they are gathering on structural resilience and engine reliability under extreme stress is going to rewrite the textbooks on 'Machine' factors in the 5M framework.
srm.dashboard is offline  
Reply
Old 11th March 2026 | 18:19
  #1260 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 3,341
From: Everett, WA
Originally Posted by srm.dashboard
Traditional aviation safety is built on 'Preservation'—preventing any failure at all costs. SpaceX, however, uses an 'Iterative Failure' model. From an SRM perspective, they aren't ignoring risks; they are simply moving the 'Acceptable Level of Safety' (ALoS) boundary. They treat a prototype explosion not as a safety breach, but as a high-speed data collection event.

The real challenge for the industry moving forward will be: how do we integrate this kind of 'Rapid Prototyping' safety culture into traditional operations without compromising public safety? The data they are gathering on structural resilience and engine reliability under extreme stress is going to rewrite the textbooks on 'Machine' factors in the 5M framework.
This is not a whole lot different than the way the US treated the Atlas program in the late 1950's-early 1960's. They were building Atlas missiles by the hundreds, launching one or two to see what went wrong, figure out how to fix it, then repeating.
I didn't know this at the time, but the failure rate of the Atlas booster during the 4 manned Mercury-Atlas launches was still ~33%. Those astronauts really did have 'The Right Stuff'...
tdracer is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.