Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Space Flight and Operations
Reload this Page >

SpaceX flight testing in South Texas

Wikiposts
Search
Space Flight and Operations News and Issues Following Space Flight, Testing, Operations and Professional Development

SpaceX flight testing in South Texas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Sep 2023, 17:36
  #441 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,418
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
I can't help but wonder how long it would have taken to develop the Atlas back in the late 1950's-early 1960's if the FAA had been in charge. Those things blew up on a regular basis, yet they continued to launch them as part of the development process to sort out all the issues.
Even when the Atlas was 'man-rated' for Mercury-Atlas orbital flights, it's failure rate was close to 1/3rd...
tdracer is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2023, 05:58
  #442 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,430
Received 1,594 Likes on 731 Posts

ORAC is online now  
Old 19th Sep 2023, 15:30
  #443 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Blighty
Posts: 788
Received 87 Likes on 22 Posts
Could be a long delay. January next year perhaps.

https://wccftech.com/spacexs-starshi...case-scenario/
HOVIS is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2023, 07:53
  #444 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,430
Received 1,594 Likes on 731 Posts
Musk getting pissed off. Not sure what NASA thinks…

US Fish and Wildlife officials have yet to begin a formal review of SpaceX’s upgrades following Starship’s first launch in April. This could push back the next launch window by months, which I know none of us want to hear.

The agency still needs to review SpaceX’s plans to operate a water deluge system during the next launch of its Starship rocket — this process could take anywhere from 30 to 135 days, the FWS said in an email to Bloomberg News on Monday.

However, that review process has yet to formally begin, the FWS said, which could further delay SpaceX’s plans to launch Starship on its second test flight from South Texas.

The US Federal Aviation Administration cannot give SpaceX a new launch license until the consultation with the FWS is complete, the FWS added….

Elon Musk:

That is unacceptable.

It is absurd that SpaceX can build a giant rocket faster than they can shuffle paperwork!
​​​​​​​
ORAC is online now  
Old 21st Sep 2023, 11:06
  #445 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pretty sure calling their work useless paperwork will speed up things.
robocoder is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2023, 18:19
  #446 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,418
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
The scariest words in the English language:
"I'm from the government and I'm here to help you".
tdracer is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2023, 08:28
  #447 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,430
Received 1,594 Likes on 731 Posts




ORAC is online now  
Old 18th Oct 2023, 14:38
  #448 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,430
Received 1,594 Likes on 731 Posts
In a remarkably frank discussion this week, several senior SpaceX officials spoke with Ars Technica on background about how working with the Federal Aviation Administration has slowed down the company's progress.

https://arstechnica.com/space/2023/1...censing-staff/

Citing slow Starship reviews, SpaceX urges FAA to double licensing staff
ORAC is online now  
Old 18th Oct 2023, 14:46
  #449 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,430
Received 1,594 Likes on 731 Posts
As the consultation with FAA and US Fish and Wildlife over the Starship mishap will likely push into November, further delaying a second launch attempt, SpaceX is calling on Congress to push FAA to issue launch licenses faster - The Washington Post

​​​​​​​
ORAC is online now  
Old 18th Oct 2023, 19:28
  #450 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,418
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
In a remarkably frank discussion this week, several senior SpaceX officials spoke with Ars Technica on background about how working with the Federal Aviation Administration has slowed down the company's progress.

https://arstechnica.com/space/2023/1...censing-staff/

Citing slow Starship reviews, SpaceX urges FAA to double licensing staff
If the FAA had been overseeing NASA in the 1960's, we wouldn't have landed on the moon for another 20 years...
tdracer is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2023, 19:31
  #451 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,075
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
Let the FAA do its job. No industry fast track for billionaires please.
Less Hair is online now  
Old 19th Oct 2023, 03:54
  #452 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Poplar Grove, IL, USA
Posts: 1,094
Received 77 Likes on 55 Posts
Originally Posted by Less Hair
Let the FAA do its job. No industry fast track for billionaires please.
But is it only for a billionaire? I have hopes to see progress in space travel, so limiting bureaucracy is a benefit to me. I suspect I'm not the only one.

The FAA didn't help us get to the moon in '69.
IFMU is online now  
Old 19th Oct 2023, 13:18
  #453 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Near Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by IFMU
I have hopes to see progress in space travel, so limiting bureaucracy is a benefit to me.
We are not going to see any space travel soon if a major accident happens during testing of these rockets. A fueled Superheavy/Starship rocket has the destructive power of a small nuclear bomb. On the first launch attempt, the rocket was completely out of control, staging didn't work and the safety systems not as expected. I wouldn't want to live any closer than 1000 miles from Boca Chica when they try it again, unless the FAA and the other supervising authorities work as good as they can. If it takes a little longer, then be it so. An accident will cause much bigger delays or even an end of the entire program.
what next is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2023, 22:09
  #454 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,430
Received 1,594 Likes on 731 Posts
SpaceX is cleaning up the concrete debris from the inaugural Starship launch! Personnel from the Fish & Wildlife Service and Texas Parks have been spotted onsite, likely overseeing the process.

ORAC is online now  
Old 20th Oct 2023, 19:09
  #455 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,418
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by Less Hair
Let the FAA do its job. No industry fast track for billionaires please.
SpaceX has advanced the start of the art in the launching payloads into space more in the last 10 years than NASA has in the last 50 years. And that did that with precious little government funding.
They didn't do that because they had the FAA looking over their shoulder and second guessing everything they did.
Sometimes you need to turn the innovators loose to do their thing.
tdracer is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2023, 15:25
  #456 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,430
Received 1,594 Likes on 731 Posts
​​​​​​​Single engine static fire demonstrating flight-like startup for a Starship deorbit burn
ORAC is online now  
Old 21st Oct 2023, 16:33
  #457 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Blighty
Posts: 788
Received 87 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
SpaceX is cleaning up the concrete debris from the inaugural Starship launch! Personnel from the Fish & Wildlife Service and Texas Parks have been spotted onsite, likely overseeing the process.
About time. This is the real reason for the delay. SpaceX were allowed to build a launch complex in the middle of a wildlife sanctuary, they made a right mess of that when the launch pad got blasted to bits and threw debris for literally miles! It's been months and there has been no attempt to clear it up. None! Did NASA ever create a similar mess at The Cape in the 60s?
Blaming the FAA is a straw man, SpaceX has only itself to blame.
HOVIS is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2023, 22:40
  #458 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,418
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by HOVIS
About time. This is the real reason for the delay. SpaceX were allowed to build a launch complex in the middle of a wildlife sanctuary, they made a right mess of that when the launch pad got blasted to bits and threw debris for literally miles! It's been months and there has been no attempt to clear it up. None! Did NASA ever create a similar mess at The Cape in the 60s?
Blaming the FAA is a straw man, SpaceX has only itself to blame.
Are you sure?
I wonder how long it took SpaceX to get Parks and Wildlife approval for their cleanup plan, and to arrange for the government required observers of their process?
Because I'd bet big money that it wasn't a quick or easy process to do that, and SpaceX doesn't have a reputation for procrastination.
tdracer is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2023, 17:35
  #459 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,430
Received 1,594 Likes on 731 Posts
Starship: Catch & release - Though not planned for the first few launches, with the help of @LunarCaveman, I have put together this infographic explaining how SpaceX plans to catch the biggest operational rocket in history on future missions.


​​​​​​​
ORAC is online now  
Old 22nd Oct 2023, 22:52
  #460 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,430
Received 1,594 Likes on 731 Posts
​​​​​​​The Flame Deflector test from earlier today was pretty intense compared to past tests. Such a massive amount of water being ejected in less than a 60 seconds.

This change is result of an additional 82,000 gallons of capacity that was added recently. Along with this, the high pressure gas system now has nearly double the capacity since the last time this system was tested.

Can't wait for launch day, when ever that is!
ORAC is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.