PPRuNe Forums - Search Results

Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Search Forums
Reload this Page >

Search Results

Wikiposts
Search
Search: Posts Made By: Flyhighfirst
Showing results 1 to 10 of 10
Search took 0.00 seconds.
2nd Jun 2022, 22:20
Replies: 155
Views: 29,881
Posted By Flyhighfirst

I think most would accept that having Sweden and...

I think most would accept that having Sweden and Finland in NATO is a greater goal than keeping turkey, irregardless of rights to the Black Sea.

Although no provision under NATO for booting a...
20th May 2022, 22:50
Replies: 155
Views: 29,881
Posted By Flyhighfirst

I can guarantee you that turkey could be kicked...

I can guarantee you that turkey could be kicked out of NATO tomorrow and nothing would change. The money, influence, perks that turkey gets for hosting these bases has nothing to do with NATO.
20th May 2022, 22:02
Replies: 155
Views: 29,881
Posted By Flyhighfirst

NATO doesn’t have any facilities in turkey. The...

NATO doesn’t have any facilities in turkey. The US does. Turkey in or out won’t change that. If you don’t think the US are paying a prime price for those facilities then you are mistaken.

You...
18th May 2022, 21:29
Replies: 155
Views: 29,881
Posted By Flyhighfirst

I think NATO would rather lose turkey and gain...

I think NATO would rather lose turkey and gain Sweden and Finland. As there is no mechanism to remove a country from NATO, that also means there is no impediment to NATI just chucking them out.
15th May 2022, 10:49
Replies: 155
Views: 29,881
Posted By Flyhighfirst

No fine line at all. NATO was defined by...

No fine line at all. NATO was defined by territory. NATO doesn’t care if your citizens are attacked. It cares if your territory is attacked.

I think NATO has become a red herring. In your...
15th May 2022, 10:30
Replies: 155
Views: 29,881
Posted By Flyhighfirst

Exactly. NATO as an organisation is a defence...

Exactly. NATO as an organisation is a defence pact only, but each individual member can still do whatever they think is in their national interests.
13th May 2022, 15:35
Replies: 155
Views: 29,881
Posted By Flyhighfirst

In short no. Any British troops there would be...

In short no. Any British troops there would be there as British troops and not part of NATO. Hence they would have no NATO protection, meaning article 5 would not be invoked.
13th May 2022, 10:36
Replies: 155
Views: 29,881
Posted By Flyhighfirst

Sorry. My mistake. Thought we were talking about...

Sorry. My mistake. Thought we were talking about post WW2.
13th May 2022, 08:49
Replies: 155
Views: 29,881
Posted By Flyhighfirst

Don’t forget the ever successful invasion of...

Don’t forget the ever successful invasion of Afghanistan by the soviets as well.
13th May 2022, 08:41
Replies: 155
Views: 29,881
Posted By Flyhighfirst

There is no mechanism to propose, or indeed come...

There is no mechanism to propose, or indeed come to an agreement for NATO to protect a third country. NATO is solely there as a defensive mechanism that binds other members to come to
the aid of a...
Showing results 1 to 10 of 10


 
Forum Jump

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.