Pilot fatigue...a victory, of sorts
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very interesting, and well done to anyone who stands up for themselves.
I am concerned that I did not know about the case, as it could affect other UK pilots.
Where publicity is appropriate, we need to know about this sort of thing, so:-
- support can be offered;
- the behaviour of employers is know to employees.
If only we had a resource whereby such case information is shared for us all to benefit.
How would such a thing be facilitated, I wonder ...........
I am concerned that I did not know about the case, as it could affect other UK pilots.
Where publicity is appropriate, we need to know about this sort of thing, so:-
- support can be offered;
- the behaviour of employers is know to employees.
If only we had a resource whereby such case information is shared for us all to benefit.
How would such a thing be facilitated, I wonder ...........
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: FUBAR
Posts: 3,349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Although the company have been totally discredited, the payout is unlikely to be adequate compensation for the loss of his position, and future difficulty in explaining his situation to any prospective employer.
In the meantime the company have managed to achieve a convincing demonstration of "pour encourager les autres " for a relatively small forfeit (I imagine ) & will never have another fatigue report /refusal to extend for the foreseeable.
Whilst admirable in itself, it is a hopeless gesture in the grand scheme of things if no action is taken against the company by the relevant authority charged with oversight, and that ain't gonna happen any time soon . . . too many "old boys club" / funny handshakes around for that to be a risk.
In the meantime the company have managed to achieve a convincing demonstration of "pour encourager les autres " for a relatively small forfeit (I imagine ) & will never have another fatigue report /refusal to extend for the foreseeable.
Whilst admirable in itself, it is a hopeless gesture in the grand scheme of things if no action is taken against the company by the relevant authority charged with oversight, and that ain't gonna happen any time soon . . . too many "old boys club" / funny handshakes around for that to be a risk.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
too many "old boys club" / funny handshakes around for that to be a risk.
But the most likely reason in 2016 is the mixture of aeronautical incompetence, bureaucracy, and time-serving laziness that has taken over at the UK CAA, where anyone who might have had the balls to confront and face down the operational management of a major operator on a safety issue left the building a long time ago.
Only half a speed-brake
Oh my. The company produced a duty schedule beyond permissible max FDP and told court it would be legal for CMD to use discretion to make their plan happen!
Genuine question, is this how UK CAA interprets the rules? Here's ours, I believe bog standard, OM-A wording (my bolding ):
(caveat: the above issue is not the crux of the argument at court as I understand it, and was completely avoided in the judgement)
Genuine question, is this how UK CAA interprets the rules? Here's ours, I believe bog standard, OM-A wording (my bolding ):
... to modify the limits on flight duty, duty and rest periods by the Commander in the case of unforeseen circumstances in flight operations, which start at or after the reporting time, shall comply with the following
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oop North, UK
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One of the dissapointing things here is that BALPA did not give their support until this was well down the road, given the importance of this to ALL members I would say this should have been supported right from the start!
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
After the tram crash in Croydon there are a few cases coming to light of the drivers being 'sleepy' at the controls. Pax taking photos of a nodding off driver last week. Now I understand the real reason for a locked cockpit door and no visits.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: FUBAR
Posts: 3,349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Disgusted is too lame a word (if as reported ) BALPA didn't support this from Day 1 . . . . . where are this Unions Balls ?
Oh, I know . . . down at the local lodge, where they always hold balls. . . . .
I know you think I have some sort of obsession with this, but, having been a victim of it in 1996, when the 2 guys on the opposite side of the table were in fact being helped, rather than challenged, by my "support" on my side of the table (who, of course went on to become part of the Flt Ops management ) I don't believe it has changed measurably.
Ask your CC member directly . . . do you drink in the same lodge as the management ? go on, ask him !
Oh, I know . . . down at the local lodge, where they always hold balls. . . . .
I know you think I have some sort of obsession with this, but, having been a victim of it in 1996, when the 2 guys on the opposite side of the table were in fact being helped, rather than challenged, by my "support" on my side of the table (who, of course went on to become part of the Flt Ops management ) I don't believe it has changed measurably.
Ask your CC member directly . . . do you drink in the same lodge as the management ? go on, ask him !
Senior Management,and Corporate Leaders should face prison terms should their organisation be found culpable or complicit in, fatigue-producing rosters or work practices, should that be found to be a causal factor in an accident.
The fish rots at the head, and these pricks should not just take the credit for profits.
The fish rots at the head, and these pricks should not just take the credit for profits.
Just a shame that the F word is being used so much when the S word Sleepiness is more appropriate in this case.
Only half a speed-brake
The case which the court solved seems clear. Company was found to had acted illegaly in persecuting the pilot after his fatigued call and refusal of duty.
a) he did operate beyond the normally allowed FDP the day before
b) he genuinely felt unfit (personal remark: the term fatigue is normally associated with a different type of un-fitness)
c) moreover, the court explains that because of B he was not legal to operate anyhow.
Had the verdict been opposite, the whole idea of managing fatigue-associated risks (not the individual implemented systems = companies' procedures, but the concept in general ) would have been shred to pieces. So quite simple in this respect.
The narrative of the first day is what I find interesting. At the duty start, the plan was beyond the max permissible FDP. Are you allowed to commence a duty which requires discretion to complete?
a) he did operate beyond the normally allowed FDP the day before
b) he genuinely felt unfit (personal remark: the term fatigue is normally associated with a different type of un-fitness)
c) moreover, the court explains that because of B he was not legal to operate anyhow.
Had the verdict been opposite, the whole idea of managing fatigue-associated risks (not the individual implemented systems = companies' procedures, but the concept in general ) would have been shred to pieces. So quite simple in this respect.
The narrative of the first day is what I find interesting. At the duty start, the plan was beyond the max permissible FDP. Are you allowed to commence a duty which requires discretion to complete?
