Wikiposts
Search
Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning A wide ranging forum for issues facing Aviation Professionals and Academics

United 737 Slide Deploys in Flight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Jul 2014, 17:10
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: KLAX
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With no one hurt, integrity of flight unchanged, and only one Lu obstructed - why divert (especially to ICT where UAL has no mx)? The safety need for those exit doors would be no different if either ICT or SNA.

I'm sure the pax would have wanted to press on as scheduled rather than divert for an inconvenient overnight in ICT.

Last edited by L-38; 1st Jul 2014 at 17:44.
L-38 is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2014, 18:49
  #22 (permalink)  

Cool as a moosp
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Mostly Hong Kong
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK we Monday morning Q backs were not there but I agree with L-38. After deflating it with a suitable tool carried as emergency equipment it is just an annoyance. Brief for one door inop on landing and continue to destination.

There seems to be a lot of a** covering and not a lot of thought goes into abnormals these days. Probably the X generation that have got into management and pilots have to Kow Tow to them.
moosp is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2014, 22:28
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: glendale
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone know if the flight crew deflated the slide inflight?
glendalegoon is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2014, 22:43
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,097
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
Could the crew have been sure there was no structural damage? A quick Google search gave an inflation pressure of 3 PSI. That's maybe half the differential from aircraft pressurization, but presumably it could go higher if the slide were inflated in a confined area. And, of course, the load would be transferred to the aircraft structure differently than pressurization load.
Chu Chu is online now  
Old 1st Jul 2014, 22:44
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: KLAX
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Moosp has an excellent point that I had not considered . . . just staying one step ahead of management's relentless attempts to gig you, now plays as the ultimate consideration in dealing with any un-written abnormal - just put her down!

Last edited by L-38; 1st Jul 2014 at 22:59.
L-38 is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2014, 23:42
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Not far from a big Lake
Age: 81
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With no one hurt, integrity of flight unchanged, and only one Lu obstructed - why divert (especially to ICT where UAL has no mx)? The safety need for those exit doors would be no different if either ICT or SNA.
How easy is it to confirm that no one is pinned under a slide?
How about when the FAs escape forward and the slide divides the aircraft in half? How good is communication with the aft end?
Machinbird is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2014, 23:46
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Age: 79
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The guys up front are pilots not engineers.
They have no idea what caused the slide to deploy or what other damage may be lurking unseen. The FE who would probably have fully understood the situation no longer exists.

Rather get it on the ground and let the experts deal with the problem.
The Ancient Geek is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2014, 00:59
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
How easy is it to confirm that no one is pinned under a slide?
Headcount. It's only a 737, not the Radiance of the Skies (oops, Seas).

I'm with moosp. Deflate it with the @#$ and press on.

Last edited by Capn Bloggs; 2nd Jul 2014 at 01:00. Reason: Wrong ship name!
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2014, 19:13
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Denver,Co USA
Age: 76
Posts: 333
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am pretty sure that dispatch and maintain acne were involved in the decision to divert. The captain could have done it on his own, but that would be very unusual for a United crew.
Rick777 is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2014, 12:33
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Europe
Age: 12
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Window heat is indeed correct in the explanation of the girt bar,
many times the door is shut from the outside,only by the loaders,
and it is possible to shut the door without the girt bar being fully
engaged..depending of course on aircraft type..the A380 has a middle
button which you must depress constantly for full travel of the door.
jigger01 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.