Front or Rear?
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Apsley UK
Front or Rear?
Not sure if this is the right place to post this, and it may be a little academic now that glass cockpits are used extensively.
But do pilots prefer front-mounted or rear-mounted instruments?As an ex-instrument man (non-pilot) with some training in ergonomic design, I would plump for rear-mounted instruments because of less clutter.
Of course, front-mounted instruments are easier to remove and replace.
Over to you.
Brine
But do pilots prefer front-mounted or rear-mounted instruments?As an ex-instrument man (non-pilot) with some training in ergonomic design, I would plump for rear-mounted instruments because of less clutter.
Of course, front-mounted instruments are easier to remove and replace.
Over to you.
Brine
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: Can't remember
Think brine means which direction the instrument is physically inserted in the panel from the rear (so flushish with the panel) or front (pilot’s side) and better for maintenance.
In answer to the original question from a pilot point of view I have no preference, both make my landings poor
In answer to the original question from a pilot point of view I have no preference, both make my landings poor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 2
From: USA
From a pilot perspective, I like to see the least amount of clutter possible. From a mechanic's perspective, I strongly prefer instruments I can withdraw from the front of the panel. I really hate lying on my back with junk in my eyes trying to fish an instrument out of a maze of cannon plugs, wiring, and hoses and tubes.
I think the best compromise is front mounted instruments and radios, covered by a faux panel to disguise the disparity of the instruments. If this faux panel is made up in sections, rather than one big piece, so much the easier to work with.
I think the best compromise is front mounted instruments and radios, covered by a faux panel to disguise the disparity of the instruments. If this faux panel is made up in sections, rather than one big piece, so much the easier to work with.
Thread Starter
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Apsley UK
Yes, Squealing Pig. I meant the way instruments are either inserted from the front with the bezel proud of the panel, or from the back with the glass flush with the panel.
One reason I was asking this question is that it seems to be a national thing.
In the UK, instruments are normally rear-mounted. The French, Russians and maybe others have also favoured this method for many years.
On the other hand, Americans (always best for easier maintenance) used front-mounted instruments. The German Luftwaffe of WWII was the same. Cockpit clutter increased a lot - just take a look at US fighter cockpits from the 50s and 60s!
Yes, it was a pain fitting rear-mounted instruments but hinge-down panels eased that problem!Brine
One reason I was asking this question is that it seems to be a national thing.
In the UK, instruments are normally rear-mounted. The French, Russians and maybe others have also favoured this method for many years.
On the other hand, Americans (always best for easier maintenance) used front-mounted instruments. The German Luftwaffe of WWII was the same. Cockpit clutter increased a lot - just take a look at US fighter cockpits from the 50s and 60s!
Yes, it was a pain fitting rear-mounted instruments but hinge-down panels eased that problem!Brine
