Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning
Reload this Page >

Hours or Sectors - which is more significant?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning A wide ranging forum for issues facing Aviation Professionals and Academics

Hours or Sectors - which is more significant?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd June 2006 | 15:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
From: southeast
Hours or Sectors - which is more significant?

I was pondering FTLs the other day and the following thought crossed my mind : There seems to be much made of monthly and yearly hourly totals WRT pilot fatigue and all the attendant implications, but, bearing in mind that it is generally accepted that take off and landing are the most critical stages of a flight, would it not make sense to also take into account the number of sectors completed? I know for a fact that for some UK regional TProp operators, 5+ sectors per day are common though the annual hourly totals accrued wouldn't come anywhere near those of our longhaul bretheren.

I am not an expert on FTLs so apologies in advance if this is a daft question or one that has recently been asked.

I look fwd to your comments. Cheers, Sid
sidtheesexist is offline  
Old 2nd June 2006 | 16:11
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 1
From: UK
Interesting point. It can be tiring!
April 06, a typical month. Only 21 hrs but 81 sectors including 27 adhoc un-prepared landing sites, never seen before.
Bertie Thruster is offline  
Old 2nd June 2006 | 17:15
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Speaking as one who lives a mix of long (15-16 hours) and short (25 mins) sectors, I am of the opinion that a "high sector" day is much more tiring than a single long sector.

There's a reasonable "adrenalin factor" for me in operating 4 X 25 minute sectors (Singapore - Kuala Lumpur) in a day, which keeps up the level of alertness. Oddly, on the other side of the coin, a Singapore Amsterdam / Manchester is not so fatiguing because of relief crew, and the mental approach of settling in for the long haul. What I do find fatiguing is a medium length day return (i.e. 2 sectors) of 3.5 to 4 hours each way, such as Singapore - Manila / Hong Kong, particularly if it's 'back of the clock'.

That's just a subjective report, the way that it affects me. But then, it's all legal isn't it?, so I must be just imagining it!

Regards,

Old Smokey
Old Smokey is offline  
Old 20th June 2006 | 14:32
  #4 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 136
From: Commuting not home
Sid:

Could not agree more. Local FTL deducts 30 minutes for sector three and onwards

FD.
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 24th June 2006 | 05:26
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
UK FTLs (based on CAP 371) do take into account the number of sectors being operated, as well as the time of day of start and finish, etc. I would imagine they all do, in other countries too.
Linton Chilcott is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.