Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning A wide ranging forum for issues facing Aviation Professionals and Academics

Fuel Gauges

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th February 2006 | 10:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter

Uncle Pete
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
From: Frodsham Cheshire
Fuel Gauges

I've just been looking through some back numbers of one of the weekly magazines are there appears to be an over reliance on fuel gauges.

Don't pilots and engineers carry out "gross error checks" anymore?

I'm a great believer in periodically carrying out "gross error checks" of contents as they appear on the gauges against what appears to have used and what you think should have been used.

Two incidents involving fatalities would have been totally avoidable if these checks had been carried out.

Check, or get the engineer to check, at the beginning of the day physically how much is on board the aircraft. The types involved have facilities to either drip stick or dip-stick the tanks. I'm not talking about Airbus and wide-body Boeings but your smaller twin jets and turbo-props.

Remember that the little round clock on the instrument panel that looks very basic. Behind the dial there may be a mini-rack of electronics approximately 15-20cm to make it work.

It can also go Wrong!

Safe Flying

MP
MaximumPete is offline  
Old 6th February 2006 | 19:43
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: The Sandpit
Surely every refuel involves an error check!!

Uplift in litres/gallons, guage in kgs/lbs. Convert volume to weight, add to residual fuel figure, check guage reads what it is expected to read. Any significant error then drip the tanks.

If that's not done every fuel-up then someone is asking for trouble.
mono is offline  
Old 9th February 2006 | 13:03
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter

Uncle Pete
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
From: Frodsham Cheshire
You've got it in one but unfortunately occassionally this doesn't happen, sod's law takes over and......

MP
MaximumPete is offline  
Old 14th February 2006 | 10:04
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Holland
I have a little spreadsheet in my PDA which I use for just these Ramp fuel checks, lovely things these PDA's with spreadsheets.
leftright is offline  
Old 14th February 2006 | 17:45
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: Stockholm Sweden
Originally Posted by mono
Surely every refuel involves an error check!!
Yes. We always work out that the fuel remaining on arrival by calculation from departure minus uplift is within 300kg for B737 up to 1000kg for B747 from the arrival fuel worked out from the flowmeters taken away from the last departure. If not off to the MFLIs. But be careful. The modern fuel system is accurate to 0.5%, while a dipstick is accurate to around 4%. With modern aircraft it is amazing how rare an error is.
You need some good conversion tables. Fuel is in litres or US gallons or UK gallons, and dipsticks are in lbs or kgs or inches or units, or litres, and do you add the outer cell in (A320 and Tristar) or not? There can be a lot of head scratching after a stick check!
Swedish Steve is offline  
Old 15th February 2006 | 00:15
  #6 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,334
Likes: 80
From: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
"With modern aircraft it is amazing how rare an error is."

Assuming it is calibrated properly in the first place!

phil
paco is offline  
Old 15th February 2006 | 08:57
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
From: Balmullo,Scotland
When I worked the line We always did an error check all IAW what Swedishsteve said used to get regularly very close 200-250KG was normal bearing in mind loads were usually at the 130,000KG mark not bad at all.
matkat is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.