Wikiposts
Search
Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning A wide ranging forum for issues facing Aviation Professionals and Academics

Airbus - Expanded ECAM - oops?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Dec 2005, 17:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: On a good day - at sea
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbus - Expanded ECAM - oops?

What's your policy with regard to AIRBUS ECAM and the use of the expanded ECAM procedures in the FCOM?

Consider HI OIL TEMP procedure. ECAM calls for IFSD.
The Expanded ECAM procedure, of which we have 2 versions until such time as the EIU upgrade is accomplished fleetwide), essentially states in one of the 2 versions that in the absence of any other anomalous ENG readings - disregard the OIL TEMP warning.

In our world we'd have already done the IFSD before getting to the FCOM and the note to disregard.

Does this strike you folks as a bit dodgy?
nnc0 is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2005, 23:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SURREY, U.K.
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We teach that ECAM drills to secure the aeroplane, then refer to Chapter 3. If ECAM status instructs to apply (i.e.) Landing Distance Procedures, we secure on ECAM, check Chapter 3, and then dive into the QRH.

Not sure if that helps, as I dont think we have the EIU upgrade yet.
SKYYACHT is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2005, 08:51
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Dreamland
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Many have far more experience and knowledge than myself at this stuff as I have only been intimately associated with Airline Operations for the best part of 40 years, flying at a selection of Airlines around the world and I readily admit that the last 15 years I have spent Airline flying most of the "Heavy" Airbus types gives me very limited credibility to make any comment, therefore it is with much intrepidation that I dare to even comment. Nonetheless with much humility.......

It's my understanding that Airbus has, in its own interminable way, tried for several years now to address the issue of unnecessary IFS and "enlighten" us as to its real intentions through its OEBs and more in particular the FCOM Bulletins, both of which, like it or not, do form a part of the operating FCOM procedures and therefore a good working knowledge and understanding of them is assumed .

With this slightly obscure method in mind the FCOM bulletins have for a long time tried to emphasize, particularly regarding IFS, that the prevailing circumstances and all available clues should be considered prior to ECAM actions.

Implicit in this is, and I quote FCOM bulletins:
The procedures calling for a positive or conditional engine shutdown should be clearly individually understood.
In other words we are meant to clearly and individually understand the italic additions and notes inserted within the FCOM 3 procedures, at least the operationally important ones as far as possible.
MOST of the time following ECAM actions should deal with the "detected" failure appropriately and safely however more background knowledge may often be required to optimize your decision making process.

Is this convoluted methodolgy
a bit dodgy
Have a nice day and good luck.

Last edited by Bird On; 4th Dec 2005 at 12:56.
Bird On is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.