PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rumours & News (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news-13/)
-   -   type-rated (757) terrorists ? (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/602-type-rated-757-terrorists.html)

before landing check list 13th September 2001 00:03

Just wanted to say hello and I am well from Pope AFB, NC. I was doing Guard duty(VT) when this terrible tragedy occured. As you know upon this happening all non emergency flights (including ours)have been cancelled. I am here at base ops waiting for release(12Sept1144). I urge all of you to keep a even head on your shoulders, do all you can to support the relief effort(give blood, send food and blankets via Red Cross, Etc) When I return to Vt I will be volunteering my services in NYC to whomever will have me(Expired EMT) for several days.My cell # is 979 574 5987. Anyway, keep good common sense as a priority, and god bless


J

Huck 13th September 2001 00:14

I have flown the DCA visual many times, and the White House is not visible at all from that direction - not compared to the mall, the Capitol, Wash. Monument, etc.

He probably was too high on the first pass, was right over the target before he saw it, made a "fighter type" turn to come around for another try, exceeded 45 deg or so of bank and stalled it. Anyone who has done steep turns in a heavy sim can confirm that you get the shaker a whole lot quicker than you might think. The impact on the Pentagon was just dumb luck.

On another note - religion has at times gone perverted and killed people, but secular humanism has a much higher body count, from the Third Riech to the killing fields....

McGinty 13th September 2001 00:16

There was a thread a couple of months ago (sorry, I cannot find the URL link for it, the search function on PPRuNe won't work cause the server is too busy) in which it was almost unanimously concluded that anyone who was a good performer on Microsoft Flight Simulator etc. but who was not a trained pilot would not be able to land a modern airliner.

The kinds of manoeuvres that these planes went through indicates something beyond amateurism in my opinion. The flight paths of the high-jacked planes, and the fact that all three of the successfully high-jacked planes precisely hit their targets leads me to believe that all of the teams of high-jackers contained one of more pilots with the following alternative backgrounds:
1. extensive 757/767 type simulator training on top of basic flight training.
2. civilian aviation training and operations, probably with 757/767 experience;
or, most scary of all
3. military aviation training.

The whole level of sophistication of this horrifically successful operation suggests something beyond a bunch of simple religious zealots practicing flying on their laptop computers out in a guerilla training camp in a remote part of Afghanistan.

helidrvr 13th September 2001 00:20

Surely the Transponder and FMC changes could have been made by the flight crew in the "good faith" belief that they were dealing with a "standard" highjack scenario.

Could the "expert" set up of the wing angle on final to get 5 floors not just as easily have been the result of not so expert flying coupled with some "luck"?

helidrvr 13th September 2001 00:21

Surely the Transponder and FMC changes could have been made by the flight crew in the "good faith" belief that they were dealing with a "standard" highjack scenario.

Could the "expert" set up of the wing angle on final to get 5 floors not just as easily have been the result of not so expert flying coupled with some "luck"?

Too much guess work - let's all wait for the FDR and CVR analyses before speculating any more.

BmPilot21 13th September 2001 00:41

This operation was obviously planned for months, probably years, cost huge amounts of money and held enormous risk. You don't then go and stick four idiots on the plane who are good at MS FltSim! They probably weren't airline pilots, more likely extremists with either some ex-military experience, or maybe they were put through a flying school with some time (type rating?) on 757/767.

I don't think it's a coincidence that all four aircraft were the same (flight deck). Pity United didn't stick an Airbus or something on that morning - that would have surprised them! It's quite possible that they could have done all their flight training in the US - there must be 757 sim in Florida for hire.

Just imagine it - "so, we've got five minutes left at the end of the session, anything you guys wanna do?" "Can we try crashing into the side of the world trade centre?" "er, I guess"

Chilling.

tired 13th September 2001 00:56

Agree with spagiola on this one - that UA 767 looks like it overcooked the turn into the WTC and only just avoided missing the tower altogether.

I'm sure these bastards had had some flying experience on 757/767 sims at least - the attack seems to have been too well planned to leave something like that to chance - but I don't think they'd have had to be experienced pro pilots or anything. After all, they weren't concerned with returning the aircraft safely to the runway, the bastards.....

TowerDog 13th September 2001 01:02

BmPilot21:

Yes, you are right, there is a B-767 simulator for hire in Florida: At the Pan-Am Flight Academy in Miami.

It is open to anybody wanting to pay the hourly fee.

I spent 5 days in that box myself this summer.

It is a pretty old and run-down simulator, but plenty good enough for learning how to disconnect the A/P and the A/T.

The visual, although old and "night only" does include landmarks and tall buildings, such as the WTC.

(Yes, I know, Pan-Am never had the B-757/B767. The simulator was bought in recent years from South American and shipped to MIA and installed there for contract training.)

Perhaps in the future simulator customers would be required to obtain a security clearance?

Smoketrails 13th September 2001 01:11

And they must of 'called' on 'Allah' for the skies to be blue?! Was it luck, did they know that it was clear over New York, how did they know and so on.....?!

It was very well planned!

RIP

BayAreaLondoner 13th September 2001 01:12

The US AOPA website has an interesting animation courtesy of FlightExplorer that shows the flight paths of the aircraft involved. Go to http://www.aopa.org/ to see it.

I'm curious as to whether it is possible to say, by looking at these tracks, when the aircraft diverted from their "normal" route of flight? That would presumably indicate when the hijackers took over, but not necessarily when the physically took the controls of the aircraft.

Unusual Attitude 13th September 2001 01:27

I don't agree with the "expert slipping manoeuvre" statement with regard to the second aircraft that hit the WTC.

As you can clearly see from the head-on footage there is a strong crosswind blowing form the aircraft's left to right, this is obvious from the smoke of the first tower.
It looks to me that whoever was flying the aircraft was simply aiming at the tower and not accounting for the drift which would have been obvious from the smoke.
He probably then only realised as he got closer and had to bank the aircraft radically into wind to hit the tower.

If he was even a PPL the chances are that he would have been so mentally overloaded in just flying the aircraft that he probably failed to pick up on the smoke as a clue to the strong drift and didn't notice it until the last minute.

No matter what the case was he unfortunately hit his target with the resulting destruction.

God bless the poor souls who perished in this appalling attack.

[ 12 September 2001: Message edited by: Unusual Attitude ]

OneWorld22 13th September 2001 01:40

The Attorney General, John Ashcroft, has said he believes that the hi-jackers were trained in the United States and they are focusing on Vero Beach, Florida. The authorities already say they know who these people are/were.

The connection with Logan is interesting, as there is a known Bin-Laden terroist "cell" in Boston.

Flight Safety 13th September 2001 02:10

Just some observations regarding the level of detail and planning that went into this attack. I'm posting again a link posted earlier in the thread for reference, that contains the flight tracks and time details for each flight.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv...jack091101.htm

1. All 4 aircraft involved shared the same type rating (757/767 - as many have pointed out). This would make organization of this attack much easier by possibly allowing some of the suicide pilots with training to train others. All pilots would have been working with the same systems, and all would be on the same "page". This would also require the "penetration" of only one flight school for sim training or other training.

2. All flights originated on the east coast, bound for west coast destinations. Since all "targets" were east coast targets, that means all aircraft were fully loaded with fuel for their transcontinental flights, and arrived at their targets with substantial fuel loads, thus making the aircraft better bombs. All 4 flights also took off within 12 minutes of each other (see the link).

3. Each aircraft seems to have been "assigned" to its particular target based on that aircraft's size and fuel load. As we know, two 757s and two 767s were involved. Both 767s were "assigned" to the World Trade Center Towers, each was in the air for about an hour (more or less) before impacting the buildings, thus arriving at their targets with large (and comparable) fuel loads. The 767s were chosen for the WTC towers I believe because they were the largest structures attacked, and had the best chance of bringing the towers down.

While the Pentagon is a very large building, I don't think it's realistic (if I can use that word while discribing an unworldy scenerio) to take out the entire building in a single plane crash. That's why I think a 757 was chosen for that building.

4. The time coordination for all flights was very well planned. Both 767s (AA-11 and United-175) departed BOS Logan within a minute of each other, both bound for LAX. The flight paths followed by each aircraft however were very different. I think this was designed partly to confuse the ATC centers and the FAA. Maybe someone can confirm if the flight paths followed, actually caused the aircraft to be handled by different ATC centers. Partly this also allowed the aircraft to arrive at the WTC towers about 20 minutes apart, thus allowing the smoke to clear enough from the first impact to allow success with the second impact.

The timing of the impact with the Pentagon occurred 35 minutes after the second impact at the WTC. Did they plan for the Pentagon to be full of military personel responding to the WTC impacts, by the time of this attack? Was the initial flight path of AA-77 towards the White House a possible diversion to prevent advanced notice and possible evacuation of the Pentagon? I can't think of any other reason for the fighter like hard course change into the Pentagon.

The last aircraft, United-93 was on a direct flight path to Washington D.C. from its course change at Cleveland, when it went down in Penn. It crashed at 10:10, maybe about half an hour from D.C. This aircraft would have arrived in D.C. with the lightest fuel load of all the attack aircraft. I think that this aircraft might have been "assigned" to the White House, as it would have been the smallest structure of those attacked, and maybe the terrorists thought a 757 with a lighter fuel load would have been enough for this building. Maybe the timing of its impact with the White House roughly an hour after the attack on the Pentagon, was designed to catch government personnel rallying at the White House after the Pentagon attack. I don't know, that's just a guess.

5. Finally, it would take some pretty good flying to perform all of this, with good navigation, some knowledge of ATC procedures, hand flying into the target buildings, and controlling the time of arrival at the targets. The pilot Tim Timmerman who saw the attack at the Pentagon, said that aircraft came in low and impacted the parking lot just in front of the Pentagon wall, dissipating some of its energy. He said the wings separated forward, the cockpit section broke off, and the whole mass plowed into the side of the building. The aircraft apparently struck some light poles on its low approach into the Pentagon.

That low approach (under the radar) and 270 degree high banked turn suggests to me someone with a military aviation background may have been flying AA-77, but I could be wrong. It's also possible that since United-93 was the last of these 4 aircraft remaining in the air, that news of what happened at the WTC and the Pentagon may have reached some of the passengers (via cell phones or other means). If they knew what was happening, then someone on board may have taken action to stop this flight, since they were fully aware that they were being hijacked.

God, what an awful thing. Trying to work out some the details is just my way of dealing with something like this. My thoughts and prayers have gone out to all who are involved. May God bless my nation at this terrible time.

OldBonaMate 13th September 2001 02:19

There seems to be plenty of evidence that these atrocities were very well planned, so it also seems to me to be a reasonable assumption that the pilots were trained and thus probably type rated on the 75/76.

The profession of airline pilot is not exempt from extremism.

September 11, 2001 saw the world as we knew it change for ever.

Paterbrat 13th September 2001 02:54

Arrived in Athens just after the Saudi 744 diverted due bomb scare and was then held on ground by CAA decree on movements, went into terminal to try and sort it out only to see the most horrifying sights on the TV everyone was clustered around.
It has been a profoundly shocking experience, it was an act that will have reverberations that will effect every single one of us in some way or another for the worse.
It was a knock on the door of Armageddon by the forces of chaos and destruction. The nihilists who care nothing for innocent lives have used our profession to create mass murder and create havoc.
God rest the souls of those who died, our deepest sympathy to America and hopefully the mobilisation of all who might in any way help track down anyone who might have assisted or taken part in any part of the horrendous act we have all witnessed

vought 13th September 2001 03:08

CNN in the U.S. is now saying that the pilots housed in Florida who are thought to have flown the jets into the WTC towers and Pentagon had previous Saudi addresses, and that they were in fact either Saudi air pilots or trained by Saudi air. They had addresses in Jeddah.

This information is HIGHLY speculative.

Does anyone care to venture a guess as to the speed at impact at the WTC? It looked to be extremely high - certainly over 400 knots. The audio from eyewitness tapes sounds like full throttle.

Huck 13th September 2001 03:21

He was firewall throttle. He almost made it completely through - most of his fuel did, exploding on the other side. You can see the core of one engine passing out the far side and streaking away, still producing a little thrust.

TOP_GUN 13th September 2001 03:30

Case 1. I strongly believe that there has NOT been a lack of restraint or indeed common sense in this discussion, it is simply human nature to reason and find out what happened on board the four aircraft, so that we can sympathise with the victims and ensure that every precaution necessary is taken in the future ensuring that these horrific events do not occur again,thus technical speculation must ensue such an event.This is a tradgedy which has affected the world and people need to discuss every aspect of it in order to have a sense of closure and a time to grieve. :(

mwashi 13th September 2001 03:37

I don't believe the hijackers were just sim or MS flight sim trained.

Flying a sim can only help you with flight procedures but not the mind set of flying the real aircraft. I don't believe a PPL or a sim trained pilot could handle such a controlled flight and a suacidal targeting at such a low altitude.

SaturnV 13th September 2001 04:27

The U.S. Attorney General (head of the Department of Justice) announced there were between 3 and 6 hijackers per plane.

One of the suspected hijackers had a disagreement about a restaurant bill in Florida, and said he could easily pay it because 'he was a pilot.'

At least two of the hijackers of the American 767 out of BOS supposedly flew into Logan Airport from Portland Maine (PWM?) on an American Eagle flight. Their luggage was not transfered in time to make the LAX-bound American flight. The luggage is providing useful information. Having arrived on a connecting flight, they likely would not have gone through a security checkpoint at BOS.

Mr Creosote 13th September 2001 04:51

Flight Safety

....this also allowed the aircraft to arrive at the WTC towers about 20 minutes apart, thus allowing the smoke to clear enough from the first impact to allow success with the second impact.
I'm more inclined to think that the delay had more to do with allowing the media time to focus the world's attention on the towers, before destroying the second one on live tv. The media was as much used as a weapon of terror as the aircraft.

BayAreaLondoner 13th September 2001 09:32

This is second hand information, but I was told that Sky News (presumably in the UK) played a video segment demonstrating how one could use Microsoft Flight Simulator 98 to crash into the Pentagon.
Presumably the point they were trying to make was that a person who'd done that would be able to leap into the cockpit of a real aircraft and do the same.
I am in the US and searched their website, but could not find the video. If it is indeed true that Sky ran this piece, then I am absolutely sickened and saddened that any member of the press would stoop to such levels of sensationalism at such a time!!!

PaperTiger 13th September 2001 10:01

FBI names pilots, according to CNN.
2 Saudi, 2 UAE. http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/12/inv...ion.terrorism/

smallwing 13th September 2001 10:06

This whole situation reminds me of bits out of the movie UNDER SIEGE (denzel washington).

I believe a person with a handheld gps, who has gained previous access to the WTC can record the exact location, thus allowing you to just fly towards that point by the magnetic heading it gives you. Used one before, it is not hard.

Mind you, everything is possible, they must have planned this a long time ago. BUT, let us not raise these killers so highly, as they do not deserve the recognition they are getting now.

Hope they roast 4ever.

Drop and Stop 13th September 2001 11:42

smallwing, I think the movie was 'The Siege' I seem to recall that an FBI building was levelled in NYC, the following witch hunt descended into chaos ..... which was exactly what the terrorists set out to do.

What measures can you put in place as a deterrent against people who don’t even value their own lives?

Desk Driver 13th September 2001 11:50

This taken from foxnews.com


A Venice, Fla., man said FBI agents told him that two men who stayed in his home in July 2000 while training at a local flight school were the hijackers. Charlie Voss said the agents identified the men as Mohamed Atta and one known as Marwan.

FBI agents "informed me that there were two individuals that were students at Huffman Aviation, my employer, and FBI told me they were involved in yesterday's tragedy," Voss said.

Voss said he accepted the two men as house guests as a favor to the company.

Flight Safety 13th September 2001 18:48

Mr Creosote, I think you're right. I'm sure the terrorists had it in mind to terrorize the whole nation, and the world. After all, a fairly large number of video cameras did record the impact of the second aircraft, and those videos have shaken us all.

Warthog 1 13th September 2001 20:09

Don't buy off on the flight simulators/MS software theories. I'm a former fighter pilot and, as such, don't have a whole lot of time in auto pilot. Although I'm not au fait with 757/767 characteristics,there's one thing I know for sure--it ain't easy to drive an airplane (ANY airplane) into a target (Pentagon) in a shallow dive with continuously changing airspeed and AOA perameters--the game enthusiast probably would have faced that scenario, but the pro (or well-trained amateur) would have the skill to control a/s and AOA significantly simplifying the problem. A level approach against the WTC would be easier, but still, in my humble opinion, beyond the capabilities of a guy with very little no-**** airplane driving experience.

When the guys go out to get even, I sure wish I could join 'em.

Vfrpilotpb 13th September 2001 20:30

Sorry to add comments such as this, but,

If as has been said earlier in this thread, that the scumbags who flew the birds into the building have had some sort of "Pro" help such as an existing Big Bird pilot, then it stands nearly to reason that the training pilot would be from the Mid/Far East, therefore how safe is it now to allow these sorts of area's/Countries to send their A/C to the USA and Europe, with this sort of Crazy mindset that now seems to prevail in these area's?
Who would risk one full of pax going into some other serious target, say in a few weeks time!

Low_and_Slow 13th September 2001 21:28


One of the suspected hijackers had a disagreement about a restaurant bill in Florida, and said he could easily pay it because 'he was a pilot.'
From what I read it was a bill stemming from the vodka he was drinking and the rum his friend was drinking. Obviously not particularly devout moslems.....


-me (ex New Yorker)


NB. I've often noticed that in those countries where cockpit access is not restricted (ie outside the US) a pilot's certificate goes a long way in getting the people up front to give a good look. It seems that at least some of the terrorists held commercial multiengine certs. Just another reminder that just because the person visiting the flight deck is a pilot, it doesn't mean that they intend you no harm.......

[ 13 September 2001: Message edited by: What was the DH again????? ]

Huck 14th September 2001 03:09

The Koran forbids suicide, as well.

Paterbrat 14th September 2001 04:58

Have just been on a web sight that has published some of the pieces of evidence which are telling indicators of the possibility of Ousam Bi Ladin's involvement, either wholly or in part. It includes the translation of his Declaration of War on the USA which makes for pretty grim reading.
He is an individual who has been decribed by his own family members as being devout to the point of extremeism even as a child. He had to be forcibley restrained by them from joining in the fanatics who captured the Mosque in Mecca in the mid seventies. He has since been publicaly renounced by the majority of his family who took out the front page of the National newspaper to do so.
He had been considered a hero during the Muhajedin revolt against the Russians and even recieved help and training from the CIA, however became a lose cannon when he returned to the Kingdom. He was exiled and now is bent on creating a 'Holy War' between Muslim and Christian. He has followers from many countries and has huge financial resources. He uses the Muslim religion and has twisted it to suit his ends and his views. He quotes it all the time and professes that to follow him is to follow the 'true way'.
How many times throughout history have we seen men use and pervert religion for their own terrible ends. He sows terror and discord and his followers revere him. He has massive funds at his disposal and is a highly sophisticated and well educated man. He takes his recruits from the poor who have little, and lives very simply among them which endears him to them, however he also appeals to the zealots and extremists, rich or poor.
He sees America as being the cause of many of the regions ills and has convinced many of his followers that to die in the name of their religion will earn them a place beside Allah.
There has been no shortage of planning and no shortage of funds or training including pilot training for the volounteers who would be his 'Knights' of vengence. There are extremists who have plenty of heavy jet experience and further training would have been perfecty feasible. He has tried for the twin towers before and failed, he just planned a bit better the next time.
He would like there to be hate and discord, it would suit his purpouse for Americans to harass and to blame all Muslims. There is no doubt that there are segments of the Muslim world that applauded the act but there are also massive numbers who are truly appalled at what has been done.
It has been heartening to see the almost calm and stoic reaction,The way in which the people of the USA have and are coping with these terrible events, there is also no mistaking the resolve of the American people, there is a sense of an inexorable power gathering itself for a War to root out and hunt down and destroy those who are in any way connected with this appalling vicious and terrible act. Much as the Japanese Admiral feared that a great giant had been woken after Pearl Harbour.
May it be well guided, and may it find and aprehend or destroy every one who is even remotely connected to that heinous act with as little collateral as is possible.
This will effect every single one of us, it already has, and the future looks as though there may be some pretty grim times ahead when the world in general finaly decides to do something about the various elements throughout the world who have believed for so long in their ability to force events by hidden acts of violence and terror. They may find themselves on the end of terror as they are hunted down and brought to justice, may it be soon

[ 14 September 2001: Message edited by: Paterbrat ]

stagger 14th September 2001 04:59

This from CNN...

We would like to correct a report that appeared on CNN. Based on information from multiple law enforcement sources, CNN reported that Adnan Bukhari and a brother, Ameer, of Vero Beach, Florida, were suspected to be two of the pilots who crashed planes into the World Trade Center. CNN learned Thursday that Adnan Bukhari is still in Florida, where he was questioned Wednesday by the FBI. We are sorry for the misinformation. Through his attorney, Bukhari says he is not connected at all with this, that he is helping authorities, and that any documents they found with his name means his identity was stolen. He says Ameer Bukhari, who he says is not his brother, died in a small plane crash last year. Additionally, Bukhari's attorney informs CNN that Bukhari passed an FBI-administered lie detector test.

SaturnV 14th September 2001 06:02

From today's Boston Globe:

By Kevin Cullen and Matthew Brelis, Globe Staff, 9/13/2001

Three men who were trained as pilots have emerged as the central figures in the hijacking of two Boston-to-Los Angeles flights that were deliberately crashed into the World Trade Center towers.

The trio are among a dozen men with Arabic surnames who were the focus yesterday of the massive investigation here trying to determine who commandeered the two Boeing
767s that formed half of the biggest terrorist attack ever against Americans.

Sources close to the investigation said that investigators had recovered from a car
rented by a suspected hijacker a so-called ''ramp pass,'' which gives the holder access to restricted areas at Logan Airport. Evidence also suggests the rental car was used to case the airport during the week leading up to the attack.

As investigators retraced the steps of the men, using an extensive list of Visa credit
card receipts, evidence pointing to the plot having its roots in the Middle East was piling up.

The names of the 12 men with Arabic surnames were not on a passenger list made public yesterday by American Airlines and United Air Lines, whose planes were hijacked Tuesday morning. But The Boston Globe obtained the complete list, and law
enforcement sources confirmed that they were focusing on up to a dozen of the Arabic men as they piece together how the two Boston flights were hijacked.

One of the suspects, Mohamed Atta, 33, is a Saudi national who trained as an airline
pilot. The other two, Waleed Alshehri and Marwan Alshehri, are believed to be brothers
from the United Arab Emirates, and are also trained to fly heavy commercial aircraft like the ones that were commandeered and flown into the World Trade Center towers in New York.

Both Atta, who attended a flight school in Florida last year, and Waleed Alshehri
received training that would have made them capable of flying American Airlines Flight
11 into the first of the two towers that later collapsed, killing what officials assume will be thousands of office workers and hundreds of their would-be rescuers.

Marwan Alshehri, who attended flight school with Atta, was capable of flying United Air
Lines Flight 175 into one of the towers, investigators believe.

Atta caught Flight 11 off a connecting flight from Portland, Maine. Two bags with Atta's name tags were on the Portland flight, but did not get transferred in time to be loaded on the Los Angeles-bound flight that left Logan Airport at 7:59 a.m., about 45 minutes before it smashed into the World Trade Center tower.

Acccording to the manifest, Atta was assigned seat 8D in business class on Flight 11, directly across the aisle from Hollywood producer David Angell and his wife, Lynn, who were in seats 8A and 8B respectively. Seated next to Atta in seat 8G was Abdul
Alomari. The two remaining seats in Row 8, H and J, were unassigned.

The passenger list for Flight 175 shows that Marwan Alshehri got on the plane that left
Boston and slammed into one of the Manhattan skyscrapers 15 minutes after Flight 11.

A Florida man, Charles Voss, yesterday said that Atta and a man whom he knew only as Marwan had stayed at his home last year while they obtained flight training at a
Florida flight school. Voss, who used to work at Huffman Aviation in Venice, Fla., told the Associated Press that the FBI agents who interviewed him Tuesday told him that the two men who stayed at his home were involved in the hijackings. Azzan Ali, a
student at Huffman Aviation, said that Marwan Alshehri had stayed with Voss.

Voss said the FBI told him that the two men who had stayed with him last year had been traced to a car found at Logan Airport. Law enforcement sources told the Globe that authorities had recovered from the car a a
ramp pass issued by the Massachusetts Port Authority.

Waleed Alshehri also held a commercial pilot's license and was rated to fly large, multi-engine aircraft.

On Tuesday night, Massachusetts State Police detectives and the FBI seized a Mitsubishi sedan that a Hampden County law enforcement
official said one of the suspected hijackers rented in Springfield and that was parked in a Logan Airport parking lot. When they reviewed videotape of the parking lot's surveillance camera, investigators found
that the car had entered the lot up to five times between last Wednesday and Tuesday, according to sources. Those sources said the constant presence of the car over the last week suggested that the terrorists had
scouted the airport, or performed dry runs for the daring attack.

Sources familiar with the investigation said the ramp pass, found in the Mitsubishi sedan, gives holders access to restricted parts of the airport.

Sources said at least five one-way tickets for the United flight and at least two similar tickets for the American flight were purchased at the last minute by suspected hijackers. The sources said at least four of the tickets were purchased with the same Visa card.

One state official who spoke on condition of anonymity expressed deep regret that airline officials did not react more cautiously regarding the ticket purchases.

''That is something that should jump out at you,'' said the state official. ''One-way ticket, purchased by Arabic gentlemen; that should have been red-flagged.''

One source said the car had been parked at least ''four to five'' times at Logan since Sept. 5.

Meanwhile, authorities in Florida were investigating the possibility that two suspected terrorists, including Waleed Alshehri, prepared for the attacks on New York and Washington while at Embry-Riddle Aeronautics University in Daytona Beach - one as a student and one while working as
an instructor.

In a statement yesterday, university officials said they are cooperating with the FBI and other investigative agencies and would provide no further information.

But the Globe found Waleed Alshehri's name on a list of 1997 Embry graduates. The FBI Tuesday evening searched a Daytona Beach
apartment where Alshehri lived during the time he is believed to have attended Embry.

The Globe reported yesterday that inside the suitcase belonging to Atta, investigators found a Saudi passport, an international driver's license, a videotape on how to fly a Boeing 757 and 747, and ''some kind of
religious cassette tape.'' Atta has previously held an Egyptian driver's
license.

State Police and the FBI spent much of yesterday searching a unit of the Park Inn off Route 9 in Chestnut Hill, where at least two of the hijackers were believed to have stayed the night before the attack. At noon, more than a dozen law enforcement vehicles parked behind the hotel, and officers, some clad in bullet-proof vests and bearing shields, assembled on the third floor of the inn.

The unit of the inn, formerly the Susse Chalet, is under renovation and only a few rooms were occupied, according to one of its managers.

FBI investigators spent about 15 hours in Room 432 of the inn yesterday, painstakingly analyzing and removing evidence, including a recliner as well as several boxes and bags of material. The operation started at 6
a.m., according to other guests at the inn, who returned last night to find they were being moved to other buildings in the complex.

All the guests were moved out of the building except Michael Arnold, of Nantucket, who was staying in the room next to 432 and was allowed to go in and shave last evening.

Arnold had noticed the two men staying in the room next to his, where he said the FBI told him they found a flight schedule and a train schedule. But he said he had not noticed anything unusual about the men.

Willit Run 14th September 2001 06:44

Certainly most of us have had a little extra time in the box to roll and loop them! Hell, most of us have even flown through a control tower or buzzed a field in the Sim. All this takes is money and a private enterprise willing to take your money in exchange for sim training. Sim training is not regulated by the gov't! Al, it takes is money!

Cyclic Hotline 14th September 2001 10:35

Thursday September 13 3:23 PM EST

FBI Ignored French Warning on Extremist-Radio

PARIS (Reuters) - The FBI arrested an Islamic militant in Boston last month and received French intelligence reports linking him to Osama bin Laden but apparently did not act on them, a French radio station said Thursday.


Europe 1 radio reported that U.S. police had arrested a man with dual French and Algerian nationality who had several passports, technical information on Boeing aircraft and flight manuals. The man had been taking flying lessons, it added.


Asked for information by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, French security services provided a dossier clearly identifying him as an Islamic militant working with Saudi-born guerrilla leader bin Laden.


"He has a pedigree as long as your arm, an investigator said," the radio reported. "He belongs to the Pakistani-Afghan network that trains Osama bin Laden's soldiers."


French officials could not confirm the full content of the Europe 1 report but a judicial source said the United States had now requested information on the militant.


The source added that French authorities had opened a preliminary investigation to establish whether the terror attacks in the United States merited judicial moves in France. The source could give no further details.


Bin Laden, who is Afghan-based, is the suspected mastermind behind Tuesday's devastating plane attacks on New York and Washington. Two of the four commercial airliners hijacked in the suicide operation took off from Boston.


Many Algerian militants fought against Soviet troops in Afghanistan in the 1980s and have since mounted guerrilla attacks in Algeria, France and other countries, intelligence sources say.


The radio said the man, who is in jail but has refused to cooperate with investigators, was a "soldier without borders" who had made several trips to potential hotspots around the world in recent months.


"He has the profile of someone who could prepare or lead terrorist operations," it said.


"This information was transmitted by French security services to the FBI but apparently got lost in the enormous American police machinery," it added.


"The inquiry that might have been able to avoid everything was not started. There was no special alert transmitted to airport authorities in the U.S.," it concluded.

TheDrop 15th September 2001 12:32

Regarding hitting the Pentagon instead of the White House:

If they couldn't find the white house, they might have spotted Pentagon by chance - most of everyone in the world know what the Pentagon looks like, and I am sure that whoever did this does not have many friends in that building. THe special shape of that building should be easy to spot from far away, right ?

Zeitgebers 15th September 2001 16:19

These terrorists were trained in the US. The guys who trained them must be asking themselves over and over 'Is there anything I could have noticed about them?' It's not your fault guys.
In this ridiculous politically correct (western)world we live in I can imagine what would have happened if something had been said. In my country (UK) you would more likely find yourself on a charge of racism for voicing such concerns.
Things have got to change.
God Bless all affected by this tragedy.

[ 15 September 2001: Message edited by: Zeitgebers ]

aardie 16th September 2001 21:57

Zeitgebers

In this ridiculous politically correct (western)world we live in I can imagine what would have happened if something had been said. In my country (UK) you would more likely find yourself on a charge of racism for voicing such concerns.
Things have got to change.
_____________________________________

I think your comments may be inappropriate to say the least. The implication is that anyone of middle eatern origin or coming from a muslim background, attempting to undergo aviation training should be considered as both a potential fanatic and therefore a terrorist. I'm sorry but I find such an attitude both unhelpful and distasteful.

No race or religion is sheltered from the fact that certain individuals that belong to it might ultimately be responsible for committing acts of unspeakable horror such of those we have seen this week. This does not mean that these individuals are necessarily typical or representative of the race or religion to which they belong.

By its very nature, suggesting that people who are not caucausian in origin should automatically be considered as potential terrorists is both non-sensical and potentailly racist. Where do you draw the line? For instance, the USA already has a history of terrorist acts which have been conducted by its own citizens, and a number of these claim to be Christian. Perhaps all those US citizens who have southern accents and observe a strict christian lifestyle should accoringly be considered with suspicion if they attempt to embark on a career in aviation.

I think the real issue is that vetting and security should be tightened accross the board to prevent individuals who may wish to recieve aviation training in order to ultimately utlise it in terrorist acts from doing so - what ever their background


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:11.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.