PukinDog another American who cannot understand the basic terminology of what I typed. I used satire to expose the use of “roll the trucks” in FAAland. Such terminology would be a) laughed at in any other jurisdiction b) be constructively critiqued in a formal debrief c) has sadly led to the loss of lives due to delayed FFS response directly due to miscommunication inside the CONUS.

But yes; ultimately - “America - Phuck Yeah!”

And yeah; most other professionals do regard US ATC RTF as embarrassingly bad. Please don’t take my word for it; ask some other pilots you might have respect for. You may in fact learn something of use.

I understood his question to mean what others' Company SOP cockpit callouts are to command an RTO, rather than what would be transmitted to ATC ("Stopping"....as long as you don't tell us to do it after V1, sorry).

"Climbing and maintaining"...yes, .that's absolutely List-worthy. Very annoying, especially since it reminds me of how dumb I feel anytime I try to understand quantum physics. ($1900).

I respect plenty of other pilots for a lot of things, but on this subject I'll trust my own assessment from experience gained over a 20 year stretch where perhaps 15% was spent flying inside the CONUS. Last time I counted for someone who asked, in and out of appx 90 different countries on every continent that isn't permanently covered with an ice sheet, and couldn't begin to tell you how many others were merely overflown so got a taste of their ATC but never got to sample the local food.

As an IOE Instructor for the outfit it was my job to stress that proper ICAO-script was spoken and spoken clearly. And although you think Americans are the only guilty parties for your ragging, I'll tell you that ICAO-correct words spoken in a guttural Scottish brogue or rapid-fire, clippy Queenslander-ese are just as unintelligible to the guy on listening watch down in Kigali who won't even bother to ask who's calling when he doesn't hear perhaps the only words he knows in English exactly as he learned them. It's all gibberish to him, and for all I know you're one of those he'd simply ignore, and could "uze sum learnin' ".

Also, just a constructive, informal debrief on your attempt at satire: Fair to Poor, sadly. An example of Good to Excellent: Dr. Strangelove.

Call to abort?

"Stop, stop, stop."

Six different airlines, four different types. The same.

Some said either pilot calls it. Some said the F/O brings the problem to the Captain's attention, who then calls it. I didn't care, if I heard "Stop, stop, stop" I would stop (abort!) and find out why in the safety of 'afterwards'.

And being said three times removed any confusion with anything else.

It's just come to mind. The cringe factor has increased over the 53 years since it was uttered.

"To the man in the tower from the man in the ship. Give us the word and I'll giver her the whip."

Yes, really. One of jet jockey's more colourful characters, who later became part of the CAA's flight inspectorate.

Like I said; you didn’t understand my comment PukinDog

Cognitive dissonance is a hell of a drug :ok:

Yes, the most striking for me was, "we'regoin'intheHudson." Full marks for everything else, but the ATC guy did not seem to comprehend what was perhaps one of aviation's most important communications since the Wright brothers.

About phraseology
 

Junkflyer; Blimey. See what you have started ? Good larf though and most posts worthy of the "What put a smile on your face" thread over on JB, I think.

Actually, after my "Abahstrip", in the coffee shop at Heston, Skip went on and asked what the hell is a "Barstrip"? Quite a few replies from the crew and a few more from those just listening in. Back in the sim, after the abort/abandon,reject, and an immaculate drill, he calmly told me to tell ATC '; minor engine problem, request return to Dispersal '. I n the coffeeshop I was able to defend with "yes, well, what the hell is 'dispersal'-? Some kinda washing powder I think.

Oh & to whoever asked, my last outfit was very clear. Handling pilot said ;" Whoever calls' stop'...........I will"...... etc.

And..........cripes (!) big fan of American R?T. Laid back, clear, precise, no messing and in really busy places like NY, no need to respond. Loved it .

I was criticised on my last Line Check, though, for appalling R/T. When told to "continue with" (etc) ,I never read back freq & callsign ( ended normal two/way conversation but, as it happened, the trip was a mouthful of something like ' company ID, four numbers and a letter ! I just kept saying "Cheers, mate, wilco"... Line Checker not happy.. I think NY Centre were always happy with "See ya BUddy".

Gordomac I am constantly amazed when I read comments like this. This is one of the fun side of PPRuNe , but OK fortunately not everybody here is what he/she claims to be..

As a test to see if it's shelf life has indeed passed one could use it on a busy day at O'Hare in response to Tower's "Line up and wait behind the departing United, traffic on a 3 mile final, keep 'em spooled Break United cleared for takeoff".

It's the only way to be sure.

Inclusive Naming Initiative?
 

Possibly, the organisation in question has been influenced by the Inclusive Naming Initiative, which describes itself: "The Inclusive Naming Initiative’s mission is to promote and facilitate replacing harmful and exclusionary language in information technology". That group has the use of 'Abort' as a term which should be replaced immediately: Inclusive Naming: Word List: Tier 1: Term: abort.

There was much comment on this organisation and its initiative when it was reported upon in The Register: The Register: Inclusive Naming Initiative limps towards release of dangerous digital dictionary

I'm not saying this is the reason, merely floating it as a possibility. It is entirely possible that other people have independently come to a conclusion that the use of 'abort' in the context of early termination of pregnancy makes its use in other fields problematic. Or there could be other, entirely unrelated reasons.

As an FO and NHP many years ago I was involved in an RTO at an exotic Greek location in the middle of the night. Shortly before V1 a large plastic sack was carried by the wind across the runway and was ingested by the RH engine on this A320. I recall the skipper (HP) saying "I think we are going to miss it". That was the last thing I heard before a loud explosion and the world lit up and my nose was pressed against the glareshield. We stopped on the centreline from 140kts+.... The brakes were applied and the skipper selected forward idle. I ran the FIRE ENG 2 checklist from the ECAM and everything remained lit up as the 30 seconds counted down. The skipper had the PA in hand as I put the second shot it. After an agonising few seconds the fire lights went out and everybody started breathing again. The fire trucks had been scrambled without input from us and long story short.... we taxied back to the terminal on the other engine. There were subsequently lots of interviews and an AAIB investigation.

Many months later were were called in for a debrief from the AAIB. The debrief was very thorough and (surprisingly) the RTO had gone totally according to SOP, with one tiny exception.... At no stage did anyone call 'STOP'. There was a lot of F*** Sh!t F*** Sh!t but no order to reject. I guess it just goes to show that as long as everybody knows what they are doing.... it will probably turn out OK.

As far as I was concerned, back in the day, if anyone called STOP (and we were below V1) then I would. Didn't matter if it was the RHS or the pilot positioning on the j/s - or even the hostie (if he/she screamed loudly enough!). And I always briefed that - it's called being a team. Worse that would happen would be a bit of embarrassment or having to wait for brakes to cool - or even having to refuel. None of this nonsense about RHS can't say that above 80kts - it is exactly then, when you are above that speed, that things can become critical and it is even more important to react without delay. That was why Captains were Commanders - to take the decision(s) and, if necessary, take the crap that sometimes came with doing that.
Incidentally for me it has always been "STOP STOP STOP" and I firmly believe that this was and is the best way to initiate an abort. Even my wife will stop the car - or whatever she is doing - when I yell that phrase out!! (Unfortunately a taxi driver in GLA did not and, as a result, we all ended up in hospital).
In my opinion it all went to pot when Big Airways changed the capital C to a small c in their manuals - the accountants then got to be Accountants.........

I fully agree with you!

One error in my Post, that you had correctly in your Post, is that those three repeated words should all be in CAPITALS with no punctuation!!

Another word with ambiguous meaning is 'right'. Could cause embarrassment (or worse) in a twin requiring an engine shutdown:

'Make sure we shut down the right engine.'

Reference to 'Engine 1' or 'Engine 2' would be safer (as the fire handles were labelled on the classic B737s).

I don't believe that an experienced crew would use that word under those circs. It would be "the correct engine" or "Engine #2". All this is just a matter of experience - and training!

I belie it's in "Fate is the Hunter" where the comment to a glum-looking F.O. is "cheer up", followed by a horrible sound of tearing metal.

Great story :ok: And perhaps you've uncovered what might be the best term to use to command an RTO. A reflexive, naturally-occurring "F***S***!!" x 3 may be the quickest, most succinct trigger word of all.

I remember doing a CRM course about 1990 and there was an AAIB inspector on it as well. He said that the most common last word on a CVR before impact was SH*T, in whatever language the crew were using.

"Stop" as the levers are slammed back leaves no doubt.