I thought they were grounded?
|
From the article
"the FAA grounded the 737 MAX following two fatal crashes since October but has allowed airlines to conduct flights without passengers to move planes to other airports" |
Originally Posted by Bankstown Boy
(Post 10430723)
From the article
"the FAA grounded the 737 MAX following two fatal crashes since October but has allowed airlines to conduct flights without passengers to move planes to other airports" |
Is the EASA allowing the MAX to be re-positioned? There are news of an IG plane unable to leave CAI since the 12th.
|
It was Southwest 8701, N8712L, a B-737 MAX 8 MCO-VCV.
From FR24: https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....a91b9ae57e.jpg |
Victorville is generally where planes go to die. It has no commercial service.
|
It didn't get too far, returned to MCO following an engine failure shortly after departure..
|
Southwest is ferrying its 737 Max fleet to Victorville for storage.
https://onemileatatime.com/southwest-737-max-storage/ |
Southwest making a commercial judgment - looking to store some airframes in Victoriaville as they think this may take a while - or fling for there to check out another issue on this aircraft.
|
Originally Posted by n5296s
(Post 10430758)
Victorville is generally where planes go to die. It has no commercial service.
|
Originally Posted by Airbubba
(Post 10430750)
It was Southwest 8701, N1712L, a B-737 MAX 8 MCO-VCV.
Wow, shortly after takeoff too, would be interested to know exactly where in the flight path the "engine problem" occurred. Was it while they were banking shortly after takeoff??? |
Originally Posted by Simplythebeast
(Post 10430731)
surely any movements should have been undertaken by now? |
WN8701 reported a right engine failure on takeoff, was given a block altitude 2000 to 3000 feet and took vectors for a landing on 36L at MCO.
After the fire crew took a look at the engine and brakes, WN8701 taxied to the gate, not the hangar. |
It's just a flight to ferry the plane to its "storage" place while the grounding still takes effect.
But, there's A HUGE ELEPHANT in the room. The Max 8 engine, CFM Leap-1B, seems to have been failing in a very alarming rate lately... Incidents of MAX 8 engines failure as compiled by AVHERALD: Incident: Southwest B38M at Orlando on Mar 26th 2019, engine shut down in flight Incident: TUI B38M near Chania on Jan 29th 2019, engine problem Incident: Spicejet B38M near Varanasi on Jan 6th 2019, engine shut down in flight Incident: Norwegian B38M near Shiraz on Dec 14th 2018, engine shut down in flight Are these incidents are simply showing a normal "growing pain" for this new type of engine CFM Leap-1B?? Or, it shows a major problem with its reliability/durability?? |
I thought they were grounded?
Here we go again ...
Maybe we could save time - could anyone with verifiable proof that airlines are defying the ban and flying passengers on a 737 Max kindly post some evidence? Thought not. |
Southwest corrects the earlier news reports of an engine failure at MCO ;):
Southwest Airlines said the plane returned to the airport after pilots reported a "performance issue'' with one of the engines. https://www.usatoday.com/story/trave...ge/3281138002/ If you've ever taken a plane into or out of maintenance at an airline hub you can see why they went back to the gate, not the hangar. The contract ground transportation company and crew skeds always seem to get lost trying to find the right address for the hangar at a large airport. I've had a mechanic take us over to the terminal in the pickup truck after waiting a while for a ride that didn't come. |
Originally Posted by patplan
(Post 10430812)
It's just a flight to ferry the plane to its "storage" place while the grounding still takes effect.
But, there's A HUGE ELEPHANT in the room. The Max 8 engine, CFM Leap-1B, seems to have been failing in a very alarming rate lately... Incidents of MAX 8 engines failure as compiled by AVHERALD: Incident: Southwest B38M at Orlando on Mar 26th 2019, engine shut down in flight Incident: TUI B38M near Chania on Jan 29th 2019, engine problem Incident: Spicejet B38M near Varanasi on Jan 6th 2019, engine shut down in flight Incident: Norwegian B38M near Shiraz on Dec 14th 2018, engine shut down in flight Are these incidents are simply showing a normal "growing pain" for this new type of engine CFM Leap-1B?? Or, it shows a major problem with its reliability/durability?? I doubt anyone is going to get to0 excited over ~1 shutdown per 180,000 hours on a new engine type. That's pretty good rate for a mature engine type.. |
My local TV indicated that they ingested debris on the runway. Afterwards they showed people picking up debris off the runway. The last shot in the video showed the plane being towed away (not at a gate)
I suspected that they may have used an inactive portion of the field to takeoff that might have collected wind blown debris. Just a curious point not significant to the Max 8 problems |
Originally Posted by Bankstown Boy
(Post 10430723)
From the article
"the FAA grounded the 737 MAX following two fatal crashes since October but has allowed airlines to conduct flights without passengers to move planes to other airports" |
Originally Posted by jewitts
(Post 10430878)
I guess all are risk evaluated,, but imagine egg on faces if one of these ferry flights resulted in another total loss? Smells like Boeing already knew the problem intimately, just tried to hide it. FAA COMPLICIT? |
Originally Posted by lapp
(Post 10430732)
Is the EASA allowing the MAX to be re-positioned? .
nor is the UK CAA - TUI UK, and Norwegian both have stranded Max's at TFS... |
A lot cheaper to park them at Victorville. |
Originally Posted by patplan
(Post 10430812)
It's just a flight to ferry the plane to its "storage" place while the grounding still takes effect.
But, there's A HUGE ELEPHANT in the room. The Max 8 engine, CFM Leap-1B, seems to have been failing in a very alarming rate lately... Incidents of MAX 8 engines failure as compiled by AVHERALD: Incident: Southwest B38M at Orlando on Mar 26th 2019, engine shut down in flight Incident: TUI B38M near Chania on Jan 29th 2019, engine problem Incident: Spicejet B38M near Varanasi on Jan 6th 2019, engine shut down in flight Incident: Norwegian B38M near Shiraz on Dec 14th 2018, engine shut down in flight Are these incidents are simply showing a normal "growing pain" for this new type of engine CFM Leap-1B?? Or, it shows a major problem with its reliability/durability?? |
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
(Post 10430835)
Here we go again ...
Maybe we could save time - could anyone with verifiable proof that airlines are defying the ban and flying passengers on a 737 Max kindly post some evidence? Thought not. Yes, I'm egging the point, but that's what correctly carried out risk assessment has to consider in terms of event possibility and probability. Besides Boeing and the FAA will (I hope) have considered the reputational and practical consequences of any further loss of a MAX airframe for any reason; eg the 'Not only' MCAS, 'but also' engine failures. Think about it. |
Originally Posted by lomapaseo
(Post 10430872)
My local TV indicated that they ingested debris on the runway. Afterwards they showed people picking up debris off the runway. The last shot in the video showed the plane being towed away (not at a gate)
I suspected that they may have used an inactive portion of the field to takeoff that might have collected wind blown debris. Just a curious point not significant to the Max 8 problems |
Originally Posted by patplan
(Post 10430812)
It's just a flight to ferry the plane to its "storage" place while the grounding still takes effect.
But, there's A HUGE ELEPHANT in the room. The Max 8 engine, CFM Leap-1B, seems to have been failing in a very alarming rate lately... Incidents of MAX 8 engines failure as compiled by AVHERALD: Incident: Southwest B38M at Orlando on Mar 26th 2019, engine shut down in flight Incident: TUI B38M near Chania on Jan 29th 2019, engine problem Incident: Spicejet B38M near Varanasi on Jan 6th 2019, engine shut down in flight Incident: Norwegian B38M near Shiraz on Dec 14th 2018, engine shut down in flight Are these incidents are simply showing a normal "growing pain" for this new type of engine CFM Leap-1B?? Or, it shows a major problem with its reliability/durability?? |
Originally Posted by speedbird_481_papa
(Post 10431137)
Also am I right in thinking that these apparent failures are just happening with Boeing? I hope someone will correct me if necessary but I can not recall any reported shutdowns or issues with airbus' offer of the CFM LEAP engines on their A320 family.
Airbus A320-neo [A20N] engine shut down incidents: GoAir A20N near Lucknow on Mar 7th 2019, engine shut down in flight Vistara A20N at Hyderabad on Feb 25th 2019, engine shut down in flight Indigo A20N at Chennai on Jan 3rd 2019, engine shut down in flight GoAir A20N at Delhi on Feb 8th 2017, engine shut down in flight Indigo A20N at Bangalore on Oct 8th 2018, engine shut down in flight GoAir A20N at Bangalore on Sep 1st 2018, engine shut down in flight Vistara A20N at Ahmedabad on Mar 30th 2018, engine shut down in flight Indigo A20N at Ahmedabad on Mar 12th 2018, engine shut down in flight Indigo A20N at Mumbai on Mar 1st 2018, engine shut down in flight Indigo A20N near Nagpur on Aug 16th 2017, engine shut down in flight A Strange fact: ALL A20N engine shut-downs incidents occurred in India. :confused: Airbus A321-neo [A21N] engine shut down incidents: THY A21N near Sofia on Mar 12th 2019, engine shut down in flight Vietnam A21N near Lahore on Feb 6th 2019, engine shut down in flight S7 A21N near Moscow on Dec 23rd 2018, engine shut down in flight THY A21N at Brussels on Nov 23rd 2018, engine shut down in flight Alaska A21N near Philadelphia on May 15th 2018, engine shut down in flight Albeit, There was no details of whether the A320/A321 Neo's involved had PW or CFM engines installed. Source: AVHERALD |
reports that it was a FOD issue, brings up more concerns than an empty Ferry flight, crewed by pilots who are totally aware of the issues.
Nobody concerened that a FOD incedent happened at MCO? With all the building work going on there, you think they might have increased FOD checks? |
Airbus 320 Neo. Ten failures, just three airlines represented. One had FIVE events, one three and the other two. And all Indian.
There's a background story to that, methinks. |
FOD?
Usually debris on the runway is a result of an engine failure, less often the cause.
(Unless debris has wings and makes quacking noises, but that leaves debris on the runway as well) |
Originally Posted by RTM Boy
(Post 10431106)
Have you stopped to think, just for a second (there saving you time), that there are people other than crew and PAX that form part of the risk assessment envelope? Let me help you with that thought; persons on the ground...under the flight path...at the crash site (heaven forbid). Once again it comes down to the degree of risk, as assessed, mainly for crew ferrying MAXs to wherever, but also what if something (anything) caused the flight to, for example, crash onto a school (heaven forbid). Would you consider that to be evidentially valid?
Yes, I'm egging the point, but that's what correctly carried out risk assessment has to consider in terms of event possibility and probability. Besides Boeing and the FAA will (I hope) have considered the reputational and practical consequences of any further loss of a MAX airframe for any reason; eg the 'Not only' MCAS, 'but also' engine failures. Think about it. The fact remains, however, that both the FAA and EASA have made provision for moving aircraft to base/storage/rectification locations. Go argue with them if you don't agree with their risk assessment. In the meantime, perhaps the spotters could try to contain their excitement on the odd occasions that they see a Max on the flight trackers, which in any event aren't infallible, as we saw with that AAL example on FlightAware. |
Originally Posted by Dee Vee
(Post 10430779)
Wow, shortly after takeoff too, would be interested to know exactly where in the flight path the "engine problem" occurred.
Was it while they were banking shortly after takeoff??? |
I would imagine the FAA issued SFP's for the domestic US movements.
|
Originally Posted by Simplythebeast
(Post 10430731)
surely any movements should have been undertaken by now? Flights are listed as WN8700-8707 daily with (reportedly) only certain crew doing these flights. Besides this hiccup, all MAX should be at VCV in the next day or two. |
Originally Posted by tdracer
(Post 10430845)
There were over 300 MAX aircraft in service prior to the grounding. Figure an average of 300 hours per month per aircraft, two engines per aircraft, that roughs out to 180,000 engine operating hours per month.
I doubt anyone is going to get to0 excited over ~1 shutdown per 180,000 hours on a new engine type. That's pretty good rate for a mature engine type.. |
Just considering an extreme ‘what if’; questions for information only, not to generate any wild speculation. Could an errant AoA signal get into FADEC or FMC / thrust management? AoA interconnected with ADC - speed / alt errors; ADC interconnect with Engine / auto thrust ? |
I imagine ramp space at Renton will be getting tight with production continuing, but deliveries paused. Moses Lake would be a good ferry site.
Victorville is a great place to park them with the reasons in the article linked by willflyforcheese.
|
A320 series NEO has had an incredible number of in flight shutdowns including restrictions n overwater flight duration. At one point several shut downs daily. |
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
(Post 10431246)
In the meantime, perhaps the spotters could try to contain their excitement on the odd occasions that they see a Max on the flight trackers, which in any event aren't infallible, as we saw with that AAL example on FlightAware. It seemed a little odd to me that the Max was still flying some time after the ban but the reasons were explained by someone a little more helpful than yourself. Should you be bored by threads such as this one you are not actually required to get involved with your pointless input but if you do feel the need to chip in with pointless comments thats okay too. |
Boeing has permission to conduct test flights out off their facility in Renton. Apart from that there have been numerous authorized ferry flights across the US since March 12th to several storage airports. This Southwest bird was going to Victorville. Being a new menber and not being allowed to post an URL here a link: Bloomberg, Where Boeing's 737 Max Planes Go When They're Grounded. It shows all the relevant movements
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:11. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.