BHX ATC Down
BBC reporting BHX air traffic notam indicating airfield closed until at least 2200 today
|
Originally Posted by Prangster
(Post 10343141)
BBC reporting BHX air traffic notam indicating airfield closed until at least 2200 today
B) 18/12/23 18:44 C) 18/12/23 22:00 E) ALL BIRMINGHAM ATC SERVICE IS SUSPENDED UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE DUE TO A SYSTEM FAILURE. DELAY NOT DETERMINED. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...ngham-46668635 Several flights already diverted to EMA, MAN and LHR whilst the LH FRA flight has gone back to FRA..:ooh: |
And now re-open at 1940
EK A380 was on its way to MAN is turning back as is a FlyBe Dash 8 which was going to EMA |
Originally Posted by Suzeman
(Post 10343162)
And now re-open at 1940
EK A380 was on its way to MAN is turning back as is a FlyBe Dash 8 which was going to EMA |
So could be shorter - or longer. Electronic Flight Plan system is down according to the Beeb |
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
(Post 10343219)
That's progress for you....
|
What I don’t get is why you need the flight planning computer to let aircraft land? They were stacked in the hold anyway, just do it all procedurally. What do you need a flight planning computer for? At that time last night it was practically VFR conditions anyway. |
Many ATCOs no longer validated on procedural approaches. Some SOPs forbid night visual approaches
|
Originally Posted by Jonty
(Post 10343458)
What I don’t get is why you need the flight planning computer to let aircraft land? They were stacked in the hold anyway, just do it all procedurally. What do you need a flight planning computer for? At that time last night it was practically VFR conditions anyway. Nobody said there was any sort of radar failure. |
Is this the ATC version of 'loss of basic stick and rudder skills' that some (OK, mainly older) pilots are concerned about? |
What with this and drones that might, or might not, be somewhere...
The UK is getting to the stage where we can't survive in the wild! We are now having to hold risk assessment meetings to see if it's safe to make a risk assessment. We insure our insurance policies. No-one feels confident to make a common sense decision, for fear of breaking a rule that might be there, or not. One of these days we're going to run a round in such tight circles that we're going to disappear up you know where. |
Jonty, I was thinking the same thing , but I already knew the answer: Controllers can't control and pilots can't fly anymore without the aid of modern technology. It's a fact of life, but the cost of maintaining steam powered proficiency for these once in a million glitches is not financially viable.
|
Originally Posted by Hotel Tango
(Post 10343628)
Jonty, I was thinking the same thing , but I already knew the answer: Controllers can't control and pilots can't fly anymore without the aid of modern technology. It's a fact of life, but the cost of maintaining steam powered proficiency for these once in a million glitches is not financially viable.
|
I think all the inconvenienced passengers might disagree with that. |
Originally Posted by tmmorris
(Post 10343617)
Is this the ATC version of 'loss of basic stick and rudder skills' that some (OK, mainly older) pilots are concerned about? |
Once in a million glitches.. or twice in a year like in BHX's case...
|
FFS - what happened to telephone calls from the centre to the airfield and then giving a radar handover? I'll ask Swanwick ATCO son and D-I-L when they arrive in half an hour!!
|
Originally Posted by The Fat Controller
(Post 10343511)
I think you'll find that ALL flight data was lost, so they would neither know what was coming or be able pass data to the relevant ATC centre for departures.
Nobody said there was any sort of radar failure. I am yet to understand why aircraft holding with in range of the airport couldn’t go on to land. At worst you would release one from the hold to self position and fly the ILS, once landed you release the next one. The go around keeps aircraft well clear of the holding stack. One wonders how aircraft fly without ATC?!? |
If the ATCOs have lost flight data, that will likely include their electronic strips, which will include all the aircraft on the airfield that have started and are moving, recovering that situation will mean a complete stop on new movements.
Recovery from that will take time, reversion to hand written strips is only possible if you have the data to hand AND there is provision for it. Data transfer at large airfields, both in and out is electronic, you cannot magic a EGBB inbound coordinator out of the air at Swanwick or Prestwick centres, there are just not the staff or procedures to do it. If EGBB called a stop, they did so for very good reasons. |
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
(Post 10343627)
What with this and drones that might, or might not, be somewhere...
The UK is getting to the stage where we can't survive in the wild! We are now having to hold risk assessment meetings to see if it's safe to make a risk assessment. We insure our insurance policies. No-one feels confident to make a common sense decision, for fear of breaking a rule that might be there, or not. One of these days we're going to run a round in such tight circles that we're going to disappear up you know where. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:47. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.