PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rumours & News (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news-13/)
-   -   Pilot's artificial arm 'became detached while landing plane' (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/545572-pilots-artificial-arm-became-detached-while-landing-plane.html)

ricardian 13th Aug 2014 23:54

Pilot's artificial arm 'became detached while landing plane'
 
BBC report

A pilot lost control of a passenger plane after his artificial arm became detached as he was coming in to land, an accident report has said.
Belfast City Airport

SKS777FLYER 14th Aug 2014 00:16

Well, the good thing, according to Flybe :


"Flybe said the senior captain was one of its most experienced and trusted pilots"




Mods, hopefully the comment is in line with approved thought and deemed by the tarot cards to be in line with authorized commentary.

Zeppelin 14th Aug 2014 00:24

far more important that everything was stabilised at the 'gate' :zzz:

oceancrosser 14th Aug 2014 07:04

Class 1 medical with a prosthetic arm?

Fostex 14th Aug 2014 07:04

I always thought such a disability would preclude holding a Class 1, obviously not!

Medical certification of pilots with a disability | Medical | Personal Licences and Training

DaveReidUK 14th Aug 2014 07:09

Pilot's artificial arm 'became detached while landing plane'
 
The BBC's Daily Mail-type headline makes it sound as if the pilot shed his prosthetic limb, which wasn't the case.

ATC Watcher 14th Aug 2014 07:11

Medicals : Lots of exceptions possible but assessed on individual basis.
Quite normal.

cleanair 14th Aug 2014 07:33

equal opportunities?
 
Please don't take this as a personal attack on this or any other person with a disability, but had this pilot had two good arms I presume this could not have happened?
What about the passengers equal opportunities? :confused:

Basil 14th Aug 2014 07:36

From the BBC:

However, as he made the flare manoeuvre - a stage of the landing shortly before touchdown - "his prosthetic limb became detached from the yoke clamp, depriving him of control of the aircraft".

While he had thought about getting his co-pilot to take control, the time available and the challenging conditions meant his best course of action was to move his right hand from the power levers on to the yoke to regain control.

"He did this, but with power still applied and possibly a gust affecting the aircraft, a normal touchdown was followed by a bounce, from which the aircraft landed heavily," the report found.

The AAIB reported that the captain had said that in future he would be more cautious about checking the attachment on his prosthesis as he may have dislodged the latching mechanism.

He also said he would brief his co-pilots about the possibility of a similar event and that they should be ready to take control at any time.
Para 3: "a gust affecting the aircraft" could happen to any of us BUT, if he'd had a hand on the throttles he could have adjusted power.

Sorry, but I do not wish to be flown by someone with bits missing. There's enough which can go wrong without deliberately starting off with a built-in disadvantage.

ChickenHouse 14th Aug 2014 07:43

Do I understand correctly? Being a pilot with an artificial arm or leg ist possible, but with a transplant not, due to the medication needs? Something like for avionics "detachable parts don't have to be TSO'ed"?

goudie 14th Aug 2014 08:02


Sorry, but I do not wish to be flown by someone with bits missing.
There was an RAF Britannia captain who had only one eye. He seemed to do ok. I flew with him an several occasions.

ManaAdaSystem 14th Aug 2014 08:31

He obviously had a class one medical, and that must have been granted after careful consideration of his ability to control the aircraft.
The problem is this, he just proved that he can't do that in all situations, so I expect the medical to go bye bye.

Basil 14th Aug 2014 08:33

goudie,

There was an RAF Britannia captain who had only one eye. He seemed to do ok. I flew with him an several occasions.
We had an ex-Javelin Argosy co-pilot with an eye missing but it was understood that, following that posting, he wouldn't be going flying again.

Basil 14th Aug 2014 08:35


The problem is this, he just proved that he can't do that in all situations, so I expect the medical to go bye bye.
My point precisely.

Doors to Automatic 14th Aug 2014 08:50

I'm sorry, call me old fashioned and I am sure this is an excellent pilot but having four working limbs should be a fundamental requirement of the Class 1, after all up to 80 lives are at stake here!

ROSCO328 14th Aug 2014 08:54

I'm with the above. Was amazed when my wife showed me this article.

Above The Clouds 14th Aug 2014 09:00


Doors to Automatic
four working limbs should be a fundamental requirement of the Class 1
For the initial class 1, yes.

But an experienced pilot who already has the skills, then has an unfortunate accident or medical problem, surely if they are able to pass the medical and required sim tests why should they not be allowed to continue their career ?

OneOffDave 14th Aug 2014 09:01

Would a similar incident where a two handed pilot lost grip on the controls resulting in the same outcome be reported to the AAIB?

Above The Clouds 14th Aug 2014 09:05


cleanair
If your happy to buy a ticket for yourself, your wife or child to be flown under the control of a captain with a prosthetic arm after what has just happened without any second thoughts for your or their safety then that is your choice but I won't be condemning you for your choice or opinions with personal attacks or insults.
And just exactly how are you going to determine who has what missing before you step onboard ? it seems the medical department have deemed the individual fit to hold the medical.

Of course it all depends on how accurate the BBC reporting of the incident is, and we how accurate that can be.

cleanair 14th Aug 2014 09:07

A two handed pilot would have been able to grab a hold of the yolk imediatly without having to re attach his arm.

brakedwell 14th Aug 2014 09:07

The Britannia captain lost an eye when his R/C model aircraft shed a propellor blade. He was allowed to continue flying until the end of his tour because he was familiar with the aircraft. Not sure what happened to him after he left the Britannia fleet.

Lord Spandex Masher 14th Aug 2014 09:08


Captain Ian Baston, Flybe's director of flight operations and safety, said it was an equal opportunities employer and "in common with most airlines, means we do employ staff with reduced physical abilities".
Oh brilliant. Safety compromised because of equal opportunities. :ugh:

How ridiculous.

cleanair 14th Aug 2014 09:11

Above the clouds
 
In lieu of what has happened in this case, would you consider the possibility that the medical board were wrong in this case?

currawong 14th Aug 2014 09:16

Why was the co-pilot not following through on the controls?

Is that not the whole point of having two up front?

Above The Clouds 14th Aug 2014 09:18


ian16th
But the paying public expect that the appropriate Government appointed agencies do this, before issuing their licenses.

This is why we have licenses!
It seems the CAA medical department have deemed the individual fit to hold the medical.

oldlag53 14th Aug 2014 09:19

How exactly would he control the yoke? I'm no expert, but as far as I know they haven't developed a hand that can do much more than act as a 'holder'? Or does he have a hook??

To the pilots who still don't seem to understand that passengers are their livelihood, the fact remains that many pax will be horrified by this, and will possibly choose not to use Flybe in the future. And no amount of sarcastic comments will make any difference.

I know people who already choose not to fly with them because they won't fly on prop liners. It may be dumb, it may be pathetic, but they won't fly on them, and that means less revenue for the airline.

Basil 14th Aug 2014 09:21


Why was the co-pilot not following through on the controls?
The FO does not follow through on the controls; he monitors the operation.
A training captain or, indeed, a line captain, if he wishes, may follow through.
I did not follow through with my FOs because I hoped that they were properly trained before being released to line flying and I consider following through to be distracting to the handling pilot.

currawong 14th Aug 2014 09:26

Ok.

Why was the co-pilot not monitoring the situation more closely?

Could just as easily have been a bird strike/ sudden incapacitation etc etc

Hotel Tango 14th Aug 2014 09:35

Anyone considered how many uneventful landings this captain made before this unfortunate incident? Personally, I would fly with this guy again. A lesson has been learned which will safeguard the potential of a repeat occurrence. Just remember Basil that there have been thousands of four-limbed pilots who have stuffed it with a total loss of life! There are quite a few psychos out there too. They worry me more than this guy!

If the captain concerned is reading this, you have my support and I will gladly fly with you.

Above The Clouds 14th Aug 2014 09:49


Basil
I feel sorry for the guy, whose professional flying career may be ended by the result of the enquiry and ensuing publicity.
I feel sorry not only for him, but every UK class 1 holder who has some form of medical restriction who may well now come under the spot light given the publicity and have there restriction re-assessed.

Pearly White 14th Aug 2014 09:51

How would this have played out on an aircraft with a side stick?

Basil 14th Aug 2014 09:53


How would this have played out on an aircraft with a side stick?
"You have control!"

As shouted very loudly by a colleague whose seat unlatched and slid back on rotate (if that's not exaggerating the process of getting a Varsity airborne ;) )

Golf-Mike-Mike 14th Aug 2014 09:54


Originally Posted by oldlag53 (Post 8607590)
How exactly would he control the yoke? I'm no expert, but as far as I know they haven't developed a hand that can do much more than act as a 'holder'? Or does he have a hook??

The verbal news announcement, rather than what's online, said that he had the hand of his prosthesis attached to the yolk through some sort of clip, a procedure he always undertook prior to landing. But in the gusty turbulence of final approach, when he pulled back in the flare the whole thing became detached so he immediately grabbed the yolk with his right hand, leaving the throttle unattended. That's when the co-pilot should have been on the case straight away, and perhaps he was, but by then they'd already bounced and landed heavily, thankfully no-one hurt.

LH-OAB 14th Aug 2014 09:56

The Captain has my support too and I was impressed by flybe's response. Contrary to the way this industry is going, I believe there's a huge amount of value in people who are outside the "perfect pilot" mould.

Sunnyjohn 14th Aug 2014 10:01

It is interesting to speculate how the tenor of these posts might have differed, had the aircraft crashed.

Bokkenrijder 14th Aug 2014 10:04

Pilots with an artificial arm, things don't have to become more crazy than that. :bored:

Apparently the authorities will stop at nothing in order to inflate the amount of pilots at the wish of the airlines, so that airlines can hire and fire at will whilst consistently lowering T&C's...

Demand and supply folks: artificially increase the supply faster than demand, and guess what happens to the price (i.e. salary)? :}

p.s. Where was the F/O? Was it one of those MPL buttonpusher follow the magenta line OM-A reader pilots who has no clue that you can fly an airplane all by yourself? :=

Martin7f 14th Aug 2014 10:10

As a lowly passenger I actually do have some sympathy for this pilot , He has done nothing wrong as I imagine that his medical etc and testing for his licence was satisfactory. As mentioned in an earlier post how many incident free landings has this guy made in his career.
The company that employ him should have conducted risk assesments etc was there an issue with the fastenings rather than with the fact that his arm was prosthetic. Maybe stronger/ re designed fastenings etc would be the answer rather than screaming for his head

sooty655 14th Aug 2014 10:12

It's worth noting that in this self-publicity obsessed age, none of the 47 passengers even noticed anything wrong, or we would have known about this "incident" in February. We only know now because the pilot reported it himself, the AAIB gave it 2 of the 120 pages in the August bulletin, and in all those pages a BBC hack couldn't find anything more interesting to scrawl about.


Give the guy a break.

cleanair 14th Aug 2014 10:21

For arguments sake let's say this pilot was without any form of disability and a mechanical device critical to the control of this aircraft malfunctions and causes a similar landing. Would the aircraft and all other aircraft of type not be subject to investigation and possible grounding until the said defect was fully corrected?


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:18.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.