PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rumours & News (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news-13/)
-   -   Malaysian Airlines MH370 contact lost (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/535538-malaysian-airlines-mh370-contact-lost.html)

DCrefugee 21st Mar 2014 22:50

Mandarin?
 

Weird/non-standard translation? So they claim all communications were in Mandarin?
I took that to mean English was the spoken language, it was originally written up in Mandarin, and then translated back to English.

No, I don't know why. LiveATC.com actually has a recording of some of the KL ATC freq that night. What little I heard of MAS370 was in English.

No one is going to use the callsign "MH370" on freq (which isn't the flight's actual callsign, anyway). But at least we have times/rough intent of the transmission. Looks completely normal to me, even the second confirmation of climbing to FL350.

Aquatone1 21st Mar 2014 22:53

The RAAF P3Cs do not have a air refueling capability.
Given the range at which this search is taking place, with a transit time of approx four hours each way and two hours on station, I wonder how long the current sortie rate can be maintained?
I do not know how many P3 crews they have these days, but what they may lack in numbers is well compensated by their capability. If I was lost they are the people I would want searching for me!

Lost in Saigon 21st Mar 2014 23:00


Originally Posted by Rob21 (Post 8393291)
I got curious and did a research on the antenna locations on the B-777. As I imagined, all the comm related antennas are under the "belly" and directly under the forward cargo bay. All the sat comm antennas are, of course, on the top of the fuselage.

Could it be possible that a fire in the front cargo bay destroyed the wiring "traveling" to the lower antennas? The upper antennas continued sending signals to Inmarsat and dense and toxic fumes took over the cabin and cockpit.

If dense smoke takes over the cockpit, it is impossible to fly any airplane. Change course on the FMS with almost no visibility very difficult, low fire but lots of smoke. For how long a crew can resist?

Antennas out?

Not all COMMs are on the belly. Some Aircraft have VHF on both the belly and the roof. HF and SATCOM would also be usable. You can use SATCOM to call your girlfriend's cellphone if needed.

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y17...7.jpg~original

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y17...a.jpg~original

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y17...b.jpg~original

Lost in Saigon 21st Mar 2014 23:07


Originally Posted by DCrefugee (Post 8393264)
The UK Telegraph has a document purporting to be the MAS370 ATC transcript. Link:

Revealed: the final 54 minutes of communication from MH370 - Telegraph


http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y17...a.jpg~original
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y17...a.jpg~original

Airbubba 21st Mar 2014 23:15


No one is going to use the callsign "MH370" on freq (which isn't the flight's actual callsign, anyway). But at least we have times/rough intent of the transmission. Looks completely normal to me, even the second confirmation of climbing to FL350.
Obviously these were not the actual words used in the transmissions. Normally, all these radio calls would be in English with perhaps a word or two in a local language.

Phrases like 'runway ready, permitted to take off' will never be heard in real world ATC clearances.

If this leaked transcript was the original source of 'all right, good night', I sure wouldn't read too much into it.

Neogen 21st Mar 2014 23:16


There is no way the aircraft flew for 5 hours or so without the crew doing something.
Hypoxia:
1999 South Dakota Learjet crash - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Learjet continued flying over the southern and midwestern United States for almost four hours and 1,500 miles (2,400 km). The plane ran out of fuel and crashed into a field near Aberdeen, South Dakota after an uncontrolled descent

Old Aero Guy 21st Mar 2014 23:16

With a forward speed of 190kts and an L/D of 20:

Forward speed - 320.6 ft/sec

Vertical speed - 16.0 ft/sec

This is about the structural limit for the landing gear so it wouldn't be conducive for a successful ditching.

500N 21st Mar 2014 23:28

Aqua tone,

As long as needed. They would pull people in from all over aus if qualified and required. It is part of what they train for, they won't want to miss the opportunity to take part.

DaveReidUK 21st Mar 2014 23:35


There's still this plausible theory that MH370 avoided being noticed by any radars by shadowing SIA68 on its way across India.
"Plausible" only in the sense that, in the absence of any firm evidence to the contrary, pretty well any hypothesis that anyone can dream up can't, strictly speaking, be ruled out.

That would of course also include the "flying for 6 hours with an onboard fire" and "abducted by aliens" scenarios, as well as the above. :ugh:

nitpicker330 21st Mar 2014 23:49

Regarding the possible report of reaching FL450.

This was from Primary radar data readings and estimations.

Today at FL380 our actual GPS ALT was 40,300'
So a 2,300' difference, this I've seen on every flight and can be up to 2,500' difference.

It's therefore reasonable that the 45,000' primary radar altitude above sea level was up to 2,500' above the Aircrafts pressure Altimeter reading of FL425 to 430. Hence the A/C wasn't as high as we think?

Not that it matters much.

ZOOKER 22nd Mar 2014 00:05

Please tell me the (alleged) transcript posted above isn't real.

overthewing 22nd Mar 2014 00:08


Re: Telegraph transcript. According to that the plane climbed 35000ft in 8 minutes, roughly 4300ft/min. A bit extreme?
My calculations say that it took about 5 mins to get to FL180, then about 15 mins to get to FL350?

Is 35,000ft a bit low for cruise on this flight? I noticed that on previous flights on this route, cruise was 37,000ft.

nitpicker330 22nd Mar 2014 00:23

1/ Alleged RT transcripts are bollocks, KL ATC and MH crews do not use such phrases EVER. In my experience working for MH and flying around Asia for the last 25 years is that MH crews have some of the best RT discipline I've heard.

2/ FL350 for this particular flight is not unusual, don't forget it always subject to ATC clearance regarding FL availability.

3/ reaching FL350 in 20 mins is reasonable for a 772ER at their TOW.

parabellum 22nd Mar 2014 00:26


"If MH379 was operating in LNAV which seems to have been agreed"

Nowhere has it "been agreed", nor should it be. As I mentioned in an earlier post, don't get mesmerised by the FMC, a very useful bit of kit for flying a pre programmed route, doing a SID or making an arrival.


The aircraft is believed to have flown a random route, devoid of known waypoints, from the time it went back over Malaysia until 08.11. If the aircraft was under the control of a person then FLCH and HDG Select are the most likely modes used.

lostinp 22nd Mar 2014 00:31

Big question remains
Was the aircraft tracked by the Jindalee radar system?

James7 22nd Mar 2014 00:32

Neogen ....

Hypoxia: 1999 South Dakota Learjet crash - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Exactly my point. The crew must have been incapacitated.

Re phrase .. There is no way the crew would not have done something if they were not incapacitated in some way 5 hours.

MAS have something to hide here, why hide the existence of Lithium batteries in the first place. Everyone in aviation realizes these are a dangerous goods. Expect more angry scenes from the relatives in BJ and quite rightly so.

The relatives have been saying all along that MAS are not telling the truth, this just confirms their suspicions.

MAS should now produce a complete manifest of the cargo it was carrying.

500N 22nd Mar 2014 00:34

I doubt it. If it was they would know where it is or at least a more detailed point where contact was lost with heading.

speedbirdconcorde 22nd Mar 2014 00:40

Whatever the outcome..one thing HAS to change....aircraft should be required to 'ping' location data (sat ) more frequently...money and tech are not the problem in this case....

Space Jet 22nd Mar 2014 00:53

For anyone who is interested in what satellites are over the Indian Ocean take a look at this site LIVE REAL TIME SATELLITE TRACKING AND PREDICTIONS

I have came across five that are in the search area.

rampstriker 22nd Mar 2014 00:57

Cheap and trivial GPS tracking solution?
 
Satcom units commonly have GPS units built into them. Seems like sending frequent live GPS updates would be trivial and inexpensive.

SMS text messages on GSM networks are ridiculously low bandwidth, they sort of piggyback on blank data areas in network handshake transmissions, no? Inmarsat uses TDMA provisioning just like GSM.


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:24.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.