Yes, I had, and also tried to figure it out using the picture and GoogleEarth. Came to the same conclusion as Green dot just before I read #65.

Just wanted to know if the company spokesperson was correct or not that this is a taxiing incident. Just for one fact.

latetonite - feel free to enlighten us!

"Potcake wrote: My mistake LVP are in force with CB 300FT or below (you can see that from the plate), however you can continue until 200ft DA if stable and visual. As low visibility proc's dont necessary mean you are into CATII - so in this case effectively you can proceed down another 100ft, but its still pretty tight and I think the origional point I was trying to raise is of all the Runways to use in Schiphol its strange to choose this one. Some people were suggesting when conditions are suitable, but infact conditions were more favourable for the lenghty Runways 18C or 18R. Ive operated into Schiphol many times and had RWY22 once - also with a strong SW wind but this was not the case here."

When visiting the tower, the controller told me about LVP coming in force when cloudbase below 300ft due to the fact that the tower controller is situated at 300ft and is unable by then to see the airplanes and has to rely on radar and therefore has to apply LVP.

Marsipulami

When the controller talks about LVP in progress he is talking about HIS jurisdiction. That means taxi procedures with lower speed, runway infraction precautions, caution on the ILS sensitive area..Not your ILS minima. It does not change your Cat I into Cat II automaticly. If you have your charted minima, you can do the approach as per your chart.