PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rumours & News (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news-13/)
-   -   AF 744 off runway at Montreal (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/340660-af-744-off-runway-montreal.html)

akerosid 26th Aug 2008 22:37

AF 744 off runway at Montreal
 
Just reported that an Air France 744, operating as AF 346, arriving from CDG, ran off runway 24R on landing; no reports of injuries.

Jumbo744 26th Aug 2008 22:38

:confused: I'm heading to the airport right now! will try to take some pictures!

CorkEICK 26th Aug 2008 23:00

An Air France jet has skidded off the runway at Montreal's Trudeau
 
Air France flight skids off runway in Montreal airport


Canwest News Service

Published: Tuesday, August 26, 2008
An Air France jet has skidded off the runway at Montreal's Trudeau International airport this afternoon, but there is no word yet on damage or injuries, Montreal police confirm.

Air France jumbo skids off Montreal runway

akerosid 26th Aug 2008 23:03

Doesn't look tres serieuse; all pax (491!) are being evacuated by buses, rather than slides; no apparent damage to the avion.

Le phew!

Un boeing d'Air France fait une sortie de piste - LCN - Régional

nahsuD 26th Aug 2008 23:43

Fox News showing live footage. Does not look too bad. Reporting 500 PAX, sounds a bit high.

alph2z 27th Aug 2008 00:14

I saw that plane over my house just before the outer marker while I was cooking juicy burgers. Everything normal; plane that is.

It's a plane hard to miss due to it's size and noise.

Landed at 148 kts gnd speed (flightaware)

Pics at:

Air France plane skidoff the runway? - Page 3 - YULAviation

MONTREAL - An Air France Boeing 747 arriving from Paris skidded off the runway at Montreal's Trudeau International airport after it landed Tuesday afternoon.

"The plane overshot the runway when it landed and got stuck in the grass," said Laurent Gingras of Montreal police. "There were no injuries."

Video of the airplane shows no signs of major damage.

Emergency vehicles surrounded the jumbo jet at the airport as crews worked around the aircraft, which was stuck in the grass beside the runway.

Some 500 passengers were on the large-bodied plane, and were being taken off the plane by emergency services.

The airport remains open and television footage showed planes continuing to take off and land.


© Canwest News Service 2008
.

VAFFPAX 27th Aug 2008 00:29

Not quite AF358... but...

http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f1...tiedepiste.jpg

:-\

S.

alph2z 27th Aug 2008 00:44

LiveATC, starts after 15:00,

(quick translation)
ATC "Westjet 204, clear landing 24R, traffic is being cleared"
ATC "AFR ...cleared 24R and B2, hold short 28 (ah ah)",
AFR "AFR, we have entered the grass, engines idling, call emergency services"
ATC "Westjest, pull-up climb 3000, traffic on runway"
AFR "AFR, do you see smoke (or fire)"
ATC "negative"
ATC "trucks on the way"

:
http://archive-server.liveatc.net/cy...2008-2130Z.mp3

(yulaviation)
.

misd-agin 27th Aug 2008 02:25

Flight Detent - LOL!

Must have been the weather conditions - The dreaded 30 SM approaches.

YUL

270007 270000Z 26003KT 30SM FEW240 18/10 A3008 RMK CI0 SLP1
262307 262300Z 26004KT 30SM SCT240 21/10 A3007 RMK CI1 SLP1
262207 262200Z 27004KT 30SM FEW240 22/10 A3007 RMK CI1 SLP1
262107 262100Z 26008KT 30SM SCT240 21/10 A3007 RMK CI2 SLP1
261907 261900Z 28007KT 30SM BKN240 20/09 A3010 RMK CI2 SLP1
261807 261800Z 27008KT 30SM BKN240 19/09 A3010 RMK CI2 CONT
261707 261700Z 27009KT 30SM FEW210 BKN240 18/09 A3012 RMK C
261607 261600Z 29010KT 30SM FEW030 SCT240 18/09 A3013 RMK C
261511 261500Z 04002KT 30SM FEW035 SCT240 17/08 A3013 RMK C
261407 261400Z 35008KT 30SM FEW210 BKN240 16/08 A3013 RMK C

buggaluggs 27th Aug 2008 10:20

Not the old hand mic cable jammed in the nws tiller trick..... :eek:

J.O. 27th Aug 2008 13:14


Not the old hand mic cable jammed in the nws tiller trick.....
Or an improperly stowed window shade ...

shogan1977 27th Aug 2008 13:47

AF seems to have problem landing in Canada !

Phil1980's 27th Aug 2008 15:21

No It's spelt Vin-Rouge :)...How did the plane start turning into the grass...theres plenty of runway ahead :confused:

fermented herring 27th Aug 2008 17:11

Friends,
here comes something completely off topic.

I enjoy reading Pprune, not only for the discussions, but also for the humor in many of the comments.

Earlier today this thread deviated into the difficulty with different languages at airports, totally irrelevant for the topic, as was commented by a number of posts:

One stating that the thread was of topic with the focus on language, and his wifes theory of what happened probably was the best so far, namely that he was turning to avoid a cat:)

This was followed by a post saying: Maybe it was a 'chat':ugh::):)

This more or less made my day, and I was digging in to pprune now to see what the follow up's of this would be. Of course the mod's were right to remove the of topic posts, but I would have liked the continuation of this.

Safe flying

FH

nahsuD 27th Aug 2008 17:13


but I would have liked the continuation of this
Gone to JB "Yet another stupid Franco/English spotters party "

nyt 27th Aug 2008 17:30

A few pics
 
from YULAviation - View Single Post - Air France plane skidoff the runway?
http://photos-e.ak.facebook.com/phot...85372_9746.jpg
http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/phot...85363_5831.jpg

alph2z 27th Aug 2008 20:54

Anyone here a tire burning expert.

Maybe #4 engine reverse was stuck at full rev thrust and / or #1 stuck at high forward thrust ?

Also, looks like left-port side brakes were braking less than right side, and the nose wheel may have temporarily been stuck massively pointing right.

As if left brakes failed or the right brakes locked up.

Surprised we don`t see anti-skid pulses in the markings, maybe it failed.

Also note the nose wheel tracks are not identical, the port one is wider than the right-starboard.
.

PaperTiger 27th Aug 2008 21:19

Wide-angle lens effect I think alph2z.

Trompe l'oeuil as they say.

VAFFPAX 27th Aug 2008 22:49

That's no wide angle effect I'm afraid.

S.

PJ2 27th Aug 2008 23:18


Also note the nose wheel tracks are not identical, the port one is wider than the right-starboard.
Port tire greater scrubbing due very high angle (turned to the right) of the nosewheel relative to the direction of the aircraft, I think.

dawgweed 27th Aug 2008 23:44

Audio of incident already available at LiveATC

ZAGORFLY 28th Aug 2008 01:23

maybe a malfunction on the Body main landing gear steering system ...

D.Lamination 28th Aug 2008 03:16

Speculation:

Either No1 Thrust lever was "Stowed" instead of the speedbrake, leading to GA thrust on No. 1 Engine - only a couple of seconds at that thrust would be needed, or whilst stowing the speedbrake No.1 Thrust lever was caught on the long sleeve shirt/cufflinks of the pilot stowing the speedbrakes.

Some airlines have procedures whereby no "cleaning up the aircraft" is allowed until the aircraft is clear of the RWY, in contact with GND control and at taxi speed. The origin of these procedures was a similar incident.

Don't know if that policy applies in AF or not.

Airbubba 28th Aug 2008 04:46


Either No1 Thrust lever was "Stowed" instead of the speedbrake, leading to GA thrust on No. 1 Engine - only a couple of seconds at that thrust would be needed, or whilst stowing the speedbrake No.1 Thrust lever was caught on the long sleeve shirt/cufflinks of the pilot stowing the speedbrakes.
Hmmm, definitely worth looking into. American had a recent incident of an engine failing to spool up in flight. It is thought that the FO inadvertantly blocked the left throttle with his sleeve while guarding the speedbrake.


Some airlines have procedures whereby no "cleaning up the aircraft" is allowed until the aircraft is clear of the RWY, in contact with GND control and at taxi speed. The origin of these procedures was a similar incident.
The feds are pushing that procedure even more in the last year or two with the recent attention on runway incursions. I can remember years ago as an FE watching the FO with his head buried in the cockpit getting the flaps, trim, speedbrake and transponder while the captain had his head buried watching the FO making sure he didn't raise the gear or something.

Those few seconds when you transition to nosewheel steering and turn off the runway are a little awkward in a widebody, you want to keep rolling to make sure your tail is clear of the runway but you try not to commit to a particular taxiway until you are sure that's what the controllers want you to do.

alph2z 29th Aug 2008 19:21

Interesting D.Lamination,

Assuming the pilot's desire to keep the aircraft on the runway it is weird that there are starboard main-gear tire marks.

I guess they wanted to stop the plane asap by applying all brakes, and worried less about the nose going right.

My reflex would have been to keep the plane on the runway, ... but i wasn't there.
.

misd-agin 29th Aug 2008 21:51

Flaps are up so they did part of the after landing check on the runway...unless they did a flaps up landing. :eek:

Flintstone 29th Aug 2008 22:53

Or perhaps the flaps were retracted in the shut down checks? :rolleyes:

Carnage Matey! 30th Aug 2008 00:15

Interesting. My airline requires the handling pilot to stow the speedbrake after landing before the non-handling pilot starts the after landing checks. As P2 it's quite a stretch to stow the speedbrake whilst operating the tiller, and would be quite easy to advance #1 throttle. Perhaps I can look forward to a change in SOPs?

misd-agin 30th Aug 2008 03:25

My airline - CA does speedbrakes, FO does flaps. No reaching across throttles, etc, etc, by either pilot.

Poof in Boots 30th Aug 2008 09:20

Air France wrote off a 747-200 some years ago in Rio de Janeiro when the aircraft did a ground loop.

Accident Air France Flight B747 F-GCBC - Airfleets


Perhaps the French government should should ban Air France from its own airspace, considering the hull losses and accidents their ariline has had over recent years?

reversegreen 30th Aug 2008 09:28

re SOPs
 
Air France SOP s are no" cleaning up " of airplane until clear of the runway and at normal taxi speed

boaclhryul 30th Aug 2008 10:02


Originally Posted by Poof in Boots
Air France wrote off a 747-200 some years ago in Rio de Janeiro when the aircraft did a ground loop.

[link] Accident Air France Flight B747 F-GCBC - Airfleets

Probable cause: SLF in control...

"People on board 273 (273 Passengers et 0 crew members)"

Captain Airclues 30th Aug 2008 10:48

Could this be a repeat of the Tahiti incident?

AirDisaster.Com: Accident Photo: Air France F-GITA

Note #1 engine in forward thrust and the others in reverse.

Dave

CAT II 30th Aug 2008 14:49

AF744 of runway at YUL
 
In over 8000 hrs on the same type I have never seen a hint of the #1 thrust lever being mistaken for the spoiler handle (speed brake). That doesn't mean it hasn't happened, just never seen it myself. What I do know is that a very good friend of mine landed in SEA on the same type and as they were approaching taxi speed they encountered an uncommanded full deflection of the body gear steering. He jumped on the binders but could not stop the aircraft from exiting the side of the runway. Fortunatley there was a hi-speed turnoff right there and he stopped on hard surface. That was at least 5 years ago and still haven't heard the reason. Boeing joined our company maintenance in the investigation. Witnesses (pax) reported sudden braking....sounds familiar.

Piollotte Erreur 30th Aug 2008 15:04

Rio, Tahiti et maintenant YUL. est-il une problem seulement avec air france?

nahsuD 30th Aug 2008 15:35


est-il une problem seulement avec air france?
At the risk of being sent off to JB, oui, I blame the French!:eek:

But on a serious note, maybe the AF SOP??

icarus sun 30th Aug 2008 15:56

Air France has had many crashes in the past few years. More so than its competitors or similar size airlines. Something is wrong but being French will be covered up.:ooh:

Airbubba 30th Aug 2008 17:02


Air France has had many crashes in the past few years. More so than its competitors or similar size airlines.

It is odd that some carriers seem to have hull losses every two or three years, regular as clockwork, while others go decades without losing a plane. American probably had the longest safe streak ever in number of operations from the DC-10 engine separation at ORD in 1979 to the Cali 757 crash in 1995.

FedEx on the other hand has had several widebody hull losses in the past fifteen years. The cause is not low pay and poor maintenance, they are probably the highest paid pilots in the world right now and the company is consistently profitable. Fortunately, they fly freight and there have been no fatalities on the mainline (the feeder casualty rate is horrific from what I read).

PJ2 30th Aug 2008 17:18

Airbubba;

American probably had the longest safe streak ever in number of operations from the DC-10 engine separation at ORD in 1979 to the Cali 757 crash in 1995.
Air Canada has gone over 25 years without a fatal accident...

ahaines 30th Aug 2008 18:24

Anyhoo, it sure takes some steam out of AF's sails for their lawsuit against everyone they could think of re the YYZ overrun...


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:59.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.