Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Stupid stunt?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Jan 2003, 00:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Heathrow
Age: 44
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry Stupid stunt?

Today we had a report of a person jumping the perimeter fence of LHR and running towards a BA 747 that was about to roll for take off on 27L. He climbed into the wheel-bay of the A/C.

He was later apprehended, the flight cancelled and the passengers had to be put up in hotels.

There was also reports of a group of people filming this dangerous person from landside near 27L.

A very stupid man indeed!!!
Murray_NN is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 08:45
  #2 (permalink)  

ex-Tanker
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Luton Beds UK
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

There was what must have been the first successful case of wheelwell stowaway a week or so back - usually they freeze and get annoxic and often mangled. Maybe this guy was inspired to emulate that act.

Pretty good fence it must be by the way...
Few Cloudy is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 09:24
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Holland
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

This guy must have seen " Die another day " and tried to imitate 007 !
Riverboy is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 10:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Epsom
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I actually started a thread regarding this topic on the 'aircrew misc' part of the site. I wouldn't say the person was 'stupid' but I wouldn't be surprised if it later transpires that the individual in question is mentally ill etc.

Edited the 'would to a wouldn't be' after 'but I'. Apologies for the poor grammar.

Last edited by Egg Mayo; 19th Jan 2003 at 14:09.
Egg Mayo is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 10:30
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Too Far North
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.....Or a tabloid journalist!
Flap40 is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 12:15
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Nottingham, England
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought stowaways's only try to get into Britain????? Out of interest does anyone know where the flight was destined for?

ES
Electric Sky is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 13:56
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm surprised the nonse didn't get sucked into or blown back the engines!!!!!!
Touch'n'oops is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 14:59
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chalfont St. Giles, Bucks.
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
THE FLIGHT WAS BA287 DESTINED FOR SAN FRANCISCO.
Archard is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 15:20
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Valley Where the Thames Runs Softly
Age: 77
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would like to hear a lot more facts about this one.

I know LHR very well, and each of the four potential holds for a 744 are a serious run from any part of the fence - probably 09L is the shortest, but I could be wrong. Even at 09L the sprint would be 2-300 metres. At 27L you would need to be of Olympic class to get from the fence to the a/c in time to climb aboard. All of the other holding a/c crews would have a view of what was going on and could call the tower.

If this report is correct the cameras suggest a journalistic stunt, but one that is too stupid even for a new editor wanting to make a name for herself, or himself, or whatever.
Unwell_Raptor is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 15:38
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He was lined up on the threshold of 27L. Two minutes departure separation, so that's why he wasn't rolling.

I was doing Arrivals on 27R at the time, and noticed something running towards the 747 from the direction of block 88 (line up from the south), my first thought was that it was a fox or other wildlife, and as I was about to nudge my colleague to warn him, the crew of BAW287 was obviously reporting what they could see to him. We actually saw him climb up the port main undercarriage leg.

The 747 shut down on the runway and got towed back.

Very bizarre.

Gonzo.
Gonzo is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 15:52
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The frequency jungle
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With the weather you guys have on the island, I would also consider leaving. But not like that !!
126,7 is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 16:26
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Obvious
Age: 78
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of Greater Concern

If it had been the black of night, could he have attached (unobserved) a limpet to the main u/c leg so that it would blow on retraction (or by cell phone activation or baro/temp)?

Anyone managing to get past the fence only has to approach the last a/c in line at the holding point from the rear and his task is relatively simple.

Someone has to point out the obvious.
Belgique is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 16:38
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,559
Received 40 Likes on 19 Posts
Now I can understand a thorough inspection of the wheelwell before releasing the a/c, but overnight
RatherBeFlying is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 16:42
  #14 (permalink)  
short flights long nights
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 3,884
Received 156 Likes on 50 Posts
OK, now lets see if I have this straight. As is being discussed in various other threads, security levels inside terminals are being taken to ridiculos levels, security levels inside aircraft even more so, where it is now to the point that a crew member is not allowed to take his wife in the jump seat, BUT individuals can calmly climb a fence a LHR and climb into the wheel well of a 747 that is about to take off???!!!!???

Is there a point I am missing? Please tell me someone, because I am astonished that this is even possible, while most of us, who either just want to do our jobs and go home or simply go from A to B, have to put up with a daily "criminal inspection" in the name of "security"!!!
SOPS is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 16:48
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Valley Where the Thames Runs Softly
Age: 77
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Gonzo, that is a definitive explanation.

What about the alleged video cameras? I am sceptical, but if that bit is true, there are many questions to answer.
Unwell_Raptor is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 17:00
  #16 (permalink)  
SLF

 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Drove past the section of fence (T4=>T123 if I have this right) the other day, and noticed that the barbed wire only appears between alternate panels of fencing. Were they short of money or something?
SLF is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 17:36
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unwell_Raptor
This is the first I've heard about video cameras.

SLF
Short of money? Well, maybe if I told you that earlier this month we were single runway for more than half an hour because the remains of a splattered fox on 09L had rendered it unuseable. It was half an hour because there were no drivers available to drive the sweeper truck to clear it up. In the end we were told that a driver had to be taken off de-icing duty. I won't bother to make any facile remark about it being the busiest airport in the country, blah blah blah.

Gonzo.
Gonzo is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 18:04
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Farnham, Surrey. ENGLAND
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I understand the incident, it was reported by some spotters who happened to video the intrusion that 2 guys climbed over a gate (which had razor wire atop ) - one of them hared straight at the 744 (witnessed by Gonzo et al) where he evidently tried to climb into the port wheelwell and the other went off in a westerly direction. Whether he knew it was US bound or not I don't know.

The first one, presumably, gave up trying to climb in the'plane and just sat on one of the tyres were he was collected by the Airfield Ops guys, then handed over to the boys in blue. He was reportedly wearing a backpack , spoke little English but did admit to being Slovakian.

The, by now, shut down 'plane was towed to stand W3 where the flight was cancelled and everyone hotelled. The Police then thoroughly searched the aircraft. Nothing/nobody was found.

The biggest worry was what had happened to the other one - was he still lurking near the runway, had he gone and hidden in an aircraft parked in T4. The whole area was checked, even with sniffer dogs, as were all the parked aircraft. He was never found. Had he gone out, unseen, on a preceding aircraft?

A quite odd and worrying incident.

SLF - what you've probably seen is where there is an extra rolled up length of razor wire on the top of the fence where there is an adjacent aid to climbing over such as a lamp post or road sign. The fence, I assure, you has 3 continuous horizontal lines of razor wire all around. I've been trying to escape for years.

SOPS - how do you suggest an airfield of any great size be made impregnable - to a quick strike such as this? Where there's a will there's usually a way but only so much can be done to negate the threat. These guys must have been really desperate to put themselves at such risk to get out of the UK.
BLK 33 is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 18:21
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does this guy realize how cold SF is this time of year and how weird the politics is in that city?
T_richard is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 18:29
  #20 (permalink)  
j17
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
sops


I am afraid in security you get what you pay,pay a pittance you get a...... need I say more
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.