Uk Level Capping
Thread Starter
Uk Level Capping
Just a word about the level capping that is becoming prevalent within London airspace.
Please, if you are capped, try not to moan at the controller. The level capping is done to keep the New en-Route Centre (Swanwick) sectors that have to be "band-boxed" at a manageable level. Usually, if the controllers on those sectors are able to offer higher, they will.
None of us "downstairs" like to keep aircraft artificially low (it clogs up the lower levels for a start !), and we fully realise the penalties involved in doing so.
If you DO wish to complain, please level it at NATS Management who went ahead with the opening of the New en-Route centre (Swanwick) knowing that they did not have to staff to man it properly.
This situation is likely to last for quite some time.
Please, if you are capped, try not to moan at the controller. The level capping is done to keep the New en-Route Centre (Swanwick) sectors that have to be "band-boxed" at a manageable level. Usually, if the controllers on those sectors are able to offer higher, they will.
None of us "downstairs" like to keep aircraft artificially low (it clogs up the lower levels for a start !), and we fully realise the penalties involved in doing so.
If you DO wish to complain, please level it at NATS Management who went ahead with the opening of the New en-Route centre (Swanwick) knowing that they did not have to staff to man it properly.
This situation is likely to last for quite some time.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All the cash spent on RVSM....and now 'tis hard to use, due to ATC.
Ain't it wonderful?
No wonder some in the USA are thinking...is it "really" necessary?
Not to mention 8.33 spacing, a complete waste of time and expense.
Wonder WHEN ATC in the UK will get their collective act together?
Ain't it wonderful?
No wonder some in the USA are thinking...is it "really" necessary?
Not to mention 8.33 spacing, a complete waste of time and expense.
Wonder WHEN ATC in the UK will get their collective act together?
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
invinoveritas
Since 1971.
Europe (and UK) reminds me of the Trident, technological advancement at the expense of practicality.
European ATC (except for a few places) seems to fit right in.
Since 1971.
Europe (and UK) reminds me of the Trident, technological advancement at the expense of practicality.
European ATC (except for a few places) seems to fit right in.
Last edited by 411A; 5th Sep 2002 at 02:09.
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with 411A that we're are centuries behind the US in many respects... but I wouldn't live there for all the tea in China - just far, far too many fatsoes!!!
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
411a - RVSM is a supreb aid to ATC in Europe. For one example it allows us to pack Oceanic traffic into optimum levels and routes both ways across the Atlantic giving customer better and more efficient service. Without RVSM in domestic airspace we could not possible handle the density of traffic generated by the Oceanic peak flows.
8.33 is absolutely necessary to allow us to continue to expand our operations to cope with increasing demand. There is a serious shortage of frequencies in Europe where the traffic patterns of countries - not just cities overlap.
We may have some difficulties but then again so did you after the politicians sacked large numbers of ATCOs in 1981. The difference is that we now live in a world where safety regulation is very public and open. The solutions Reagan's government used to "solve" those shortages would not be allowed today.
8.33 is absolutely necessary to allow us to continue to expand our operations to cope with increasing demand. There is a serious shortage of frequencies in Europe where the traffic patterns of countries - not just cities overlap.
We may have some difficulties but then again so did you after the politicians sacked large numbers of ATCOs in 1981. The difference is that we now live in a world where safety regulation is very public and open. The solutions Reagan's government used to "solve" those shortages would not be allowed today.
411a says:
I have to say that many of us in the UK who use the system every day are asking the same question, sooner rather than later would be my hope.
Wonder WHEN ATC in the UK will get their collective act together?
Thread Starter
Thanks Cough.......at least you have hit the nail on the head
Any of you others realise just how damned frustrated (to put it mildly) we controllers are at the state that Management has allowed NATS to get in to ???
It's not only the new centre at Swanwick that is grossly understaffed - the disease runs all the way through the operational side of the "company"......and the very sad thing is, that it will not be getting better in the foreseeable future !!!
Any of you others realise just how damned frustrated (to put it mildly) we controllers are at the state that Management has allowed NATS to get in to ???
It's not only the new centre at Swanwick that is grossly understaffed - the disease runs all the way through the operational side of the "company"......and the very sad thing is, that it will not be getting better in the foreseeable future !!!
I've been told there are some alarming projections for operational controller numbers within NATS that suggest the number of departures (normal retirements, early retirements, loss of medical, etc) will exceed the number of replacements until about 2007. At that point things will start to improve until, in about 2011, we will be back up to the desperate state we are in today!!!
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
we haven't got 8.33 freq spacings at Swanwick yet, trails on S1/S2 soon to start, and then after only S3/S4 can also have them, due to ALL other airspace incorporating stuff below FL245. Didn't think Scottish had it either.
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Inside the M25
Posts: 2,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So what's the problem with level capping, then? My company asks ATC for it to avoid slot delays. They also usually ask me if I am happy to accept a lower level - and if it avoids a delay, the answer is yes. The fuel penalty to go from about FL360 to FL260 on a UK domestic route is probably less than 200 kg, anyway.
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hants, UK
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
5MB: Don't forget the new S11 will be FL315+, so I suppose that will be a candidate for 8.33 also.
Reference the numbers at Swanwick:
A requirement (depending on who's presenting the figures!) of between 380 and 410 controllers. Presently 40-odd short (c/10%). Next year maybe another 15 less (13%+).
The only long-term solution: Train like mad to get as many people valid as quickly as possible.
The local management approach: Take instructors out of the simulator to control planes and reduce daily delays.
The result: Ever deeper into the mire.
Good, innit?
Reference the numbers at Swanwick:
A requirement (depending on who's presenting the figures!) of between 380 and 410 controllers. Presently 40-odd short (c/10%). Next year maybe another 15 less (13%+).
The only long-term solution: Train like mad to get as many people valid as quickly as possible.
The local management approach: Take instructors out of the simulator to control planes and reduce daily delays.
The result: Ever deeper into the mire.
Good, innit?