Last A380 Leaves Assembly Hall
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Narfalk
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Like the 74's.. Why burn fuel in 4 gas turbines when you can get 2/3rd of the pax across with 2? Work the maths out the 4 donk drivers. 2 Engines carrying Zero Squared at the mo is also cheaper that 4..
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Paisley, Florida USA
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jack D
What was the great engineering achievement? Other than size, it seemed to be a pretty conventional aircraft to me and was not that much better than the B-747 which has been in service for 50 years.
What was the great engineering achievement? Other than size, it seemed to be a pretty conventional aircraft to me and was not that much better than the B-747 which has been in service for 50 years.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Eu
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The reasons why it is a fantastic achievement are many and varied. Are you from the USA by any chance ? as consolation I feel the B747 was also a great aeroplane, and a real gamble at a time when the future looked to be set fair for supersonic transport aircraft to take over the world .
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The No Transgression Zone
Posts: 2,481
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
srjumbo747
Plane as a shortcut to saying airplane comes from the fact that a wing is fundamentally an inclined plane, not a wood plane....I say plane all the time.
Plane as a shortcut to saying airplane comes from the fact that a wing is fundamentally an inclined plane, not a wood plane....I say plane all the time.
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Paisley, Florida USA
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jack D
I'm still waiting for a specific example of the "great engineering achievement". Don't get me wrong, I think that the A380 is a fine aircraft, but I fail to see it as a 'break through" design of any sort.
I'm still waiting for a specific example of the "great engineering achievement". Don't get me wrong, I think that the A380 is a fine aircraft, but I fail to see it as a 'break through" design of any sort.
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: ex EGNM, now NZRO
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As a mere SLF (and not a particularly well-heeled one at that!), the A380 is easily my favourite commercial aeroplane I've flown on. One flight that stands out was LHR-YVR a few years ago, sat towards the back of the upper deck. Whisper quiet, and very comfortable for economy.
Never really understood the comments about it being an 'ugly' aeroplane. It might not be the most visually attractive of all-time, but it's fine, and quite a sight to at take-off and on approach.
Never really understood the comments about it being an 'ugly' aeroplane. It might not be the most visually attractive of all-time, but it's fine, and quite a sight to at take-off and on approach.
I’m with DP. Great aeroplane for the SLF. When travelling Sydney to the UK we would make sure that we flew on an A380. Quiet, spacious and one one memorable occasion when we had accumulated a few frequent flyer points, we had a shower in the air! No other aeroplane can do that.
CH3CH2OH
Love paxing in the 380/350/747 vs 777/787 from a comfort perspective.
Still mass long haul is dead for a while so we’ll have to make do with what we can afford/what’s left when things open up again in a couple of years or so.
Still mass long haul is dead for a while so we’ll have to make do with what we can afford/what’s left when things open up again in a couple of years or so.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Country
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jack D;
Well a couple of points - First Class on the A380 was good, the showers were a gimmick that I never bothered with. But First Class on all major airlines is good - the only thing that made EK's First Class stand out was the individual cabins and they have those on the 777. The bar area was good but they were not the first airline to have a bar, Imperial Airlines had one in the 1930's.
The A380 didnt have anything that other airlines or aircraft types had - that is why compared with Concorde (or the 747) it was not a revolution, or even evolution, in air travel.
Well a couple of points - First Class on the A380 was good, the showers were a gimmick that I never bothered with. But First Class on all major airlines is good - the only thing that made EK's First Class stand out was the individual cabins and they have those on the 777. The bar area was good but they were not the first airline to have a bar, Imperial Airlines had one in the 1930's.
The A380 didnt have anything that other airlines or aircraft types had - that is why compared with Concorde (or the 747) it was not a revolution, or even evolution, in air travel.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Eu
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wish it were so that first cl on all major airlines is good , sadly that really isn’t the case. Try any US carrier and prepare to be disappointed
As for cabin innovation , bars showers etc.I agree nothing new , but also nothing else has them at the moment , and the comfort and low noise levels, both inside and outside,are exceptional.
The achievement lies in a company, which was only founded in the early 70,s , building, assembling and successfully launching the worlds largest passenger aircraft . Allegedly there are more than 400 technological advances on the aeroplane , which imo counts for something .
As for cabin innovation , bars showers etc.I agree nothing new , but also nothing else has them at the moment , and the comfort and low noise levels, both inside and outside,are exceptional.
The achievement lies in a company, which was only founded in the early 70,s , building, assembling and successfully launching the worlds largest passenger aircraft . Allegedly there are more than 400 technological advances on the aeroplane , which imo counts for something .
Last edited by Jack D; 29th Sep 2020 at 00:31.
snrjumbo 747
Who really cares about what the A380 looks like , it's not a fashion parade where looks count it's built for passengers to enjoy flying and it succeeds handsomely.
Over my many years in aviation I have travelled in an awful lot of aeroplane types in all 3 classes but in the last 10 years either first or Business class.
Without any doubt whatever the A380 wins the comfort and enjoyment as a passenger by a very long mile!!!
The B747 was very good but nowhere near as good as the A380 as far as passenger comfort goes.
The B777 and B787 are not very nice at all , bloody noisy and uncomfortable.
The A350 is IMOP the next best thing to the A380 and the others don't come anywhere near it, it really is a most pleasant aeroplane to passenger in.
It's very sad to see such a wonderful passengers aeroplane as the A380 virtually disappear from our skies.
One can only hope it returns post Covid.
Who really cares about what the A380 looks like , it's not a fashion parade where looks count it's built for passengers to enjoy flying and it succeeds handsomely.
Over my many years in aviation I have travelled in an awful lot of aeroplane types in all 3 classes but in the last 10 years either first or Business class.
Without any doubt whatever the A380 wins the comfort and enjoyment as a passenger by a very long mile!!!
The B747 was very good but nowhere near as good as the A380 as far as passenger comfort goes.
The B777 and B787 are not very nice at all , bloody noisy and uncomfortable.
The A350 is IMOP the next best thing to the A380 and the others don't come anywhere near it, it really is a most pleasant aeroplane to passenger in.
It's very sad to see such a wonderful passengers aeroplane as the A380 virtually disappear from our skies.
One can only hope it returns post Covid.
It’s an aeroplane or an airplane but not a plane.
Plane as a shortcut to saying airplane comes from the fact that a wing is fundamentally an inclined plane, not a wood plane....I say plane all the time
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Boeing killed the 747 and the all other 4 engine pax aircraft when they built the triple 7.. or rather the regulators did when they gave it 3 hours ETOPS... yet Airbus still went ahead with the whale... not a good looking aircraft by any standards, and was never going to compete with the 747 because it cant be converted into a freighter...it was never going to be a success, it might fly nice ( but how would a pilot know unless he turns off the playstation controlling it 
!!! ) French arrogance ( or a few high high ups at AB) , pushed it though because they thought anything Boeing can do we can do worse, i mean better, and it has its time and place in history...... I bet all the city's and airport authorities who spent millions upgrading runways and terminals are thrilled they wasted all that cash
!!! ) French arrogance ( or a few high high ups at AB) , pushed it though because they thought anything Boeing can do we can do worse, i mean better, and it has its time and place in history...... I bet all the city's and airport authorities who spent millions upgrading runways and terminals are thrilled they wasted all that cash
