Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

PIA A320 Crash Karachi

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

PIA A320 Crash Karachi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th May 2020, 15:11
  #821 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,536
Received 49 Likes on 31 Posts
Luftwaffe had a lot of widowmakers.
What to do if you wanted to get hold of an F 104 in Germany during the 1970s ?

Buy a field in the countryside and wait.
krismiler is offline  
Old 28th May 2020, 15:17
  #822 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In Airbus there are a lot of warnings that tell you gear is not down. Did the crew activate approach? Did the landing memo appear? If it did did they look at it? Ldg Gear DN if it is green then the gear is down and locked. Did the SD display wheel page? If it did then at least one LGCIU did it show green? Now that the CVR is found it will reveal their activity from TOD to all the way down.
vilas is online now  
Old 28th May 2020, 15:47
  #823 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Yes.
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by krismiler
You're not wrong there !

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9pN591cF1Y

A relative of mine worked for BEA in those days as ground staff and said "Good morning" to a Captain as he walked past him in the corridor. Response was "People like you don't talk to people like me."

Unbelievable these days, but 40-50 years ago things were different.
Without being critical of crew or company, i did notice during that clip, the Captain wasn't using a five point harness. 4 points were used. In a deceleration that buckle will ride up above the pelvis without that 5th strap. If the deceleration is sufficent the occupant will probably never walk again.

That 5th point that comes up between the legs if adjusted correctly, will keep that harness buckle at the pelvis, helping to prevent a broken back. May do damage to the men but at least the chances of walking again are enhanced in the event of a survivable accident.

A bit of interesting but useless information for some, maybe useful to others.
Dan_Brown is offline  
Old 28th May 2020, 16:03
  #824 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Leicester
Posts: 73
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by vilas
In Airbus there are a lot of warnings that tell you gear is not down. Did the crew activate approach? Did the landing memo appear? If it did did they look at it? Ldg Gear DN if it is green then the gear is down and locked. Did the SD display wheel page? If it did then at least one LGCIU did it show green? Now that the CVR is found it will reveal their activity from TOD to all the way down.
Welcome to the thread...

I fear your optimism in CVR data capture may be a little ambitious...
DaveJ75 is offline  
Old 28th May 2020, 16:35
  #825 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Korea
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveJ75
I fear your optimism in CVR data capture may be a little ambitious...
Not trying to sound optimistic. But the day will come when it has a CCTV track.
Euclideanplane is offline  
Old 28th May 2020, 17:05
  #826 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Euclideanplane
Not trying to sound optimistic. But the day will come when it has a CCTV track.
I think we know what happened but not why. The rushed descent was because they missed TOD. Why they missed TOD will likely be on the CVR. Hopefully it wasn't an FMS keying error but you never know. We could all speculate about cockpit arguments, visits to the cockpit by a VIP, or both crew sleeping. But once TOD was missed the descent, briefed or not, was rushed. This led to a highly unstabilized approach and whilst the PF was concentrating solely on scrubbing speed and height, the crew jointly forgot to lower the gear. Amazingly the PF got the aircraft down onto the tarmac but without gear extended they were doomed. They most probably would have overrun but I bet they would now trade a runaway excursion for what subsequently happened. So very sad.
asdf1234 is offline  
Old 28th May 2020, 17:23
  #827 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,907
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I'm still flabbergasted that two passengers walked from this one...

Just out of curiosity does anyone know what type of FDR were fitted on this airframe?
atakacs is offline  
Old 28th May 2020, 17:45
  #828 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: on a beach
Age: 68
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by asdf1234
I think we know what happened but not why. The rushed descent was because they missed TOD. Why they missed TOD will likely be on the CVR. Hopefully it wasn't an FMS keying error but you never know. We could all speculate about cockpit arguments, visits to the cockpit by a VIP, or both crew sleeping. But once TOD was missed the descent, briefed or not, was rushed. This led to a highly unstabilized approach and whilst the PF was concentrating solely on scrubbing speed and height, the crew jointly forgot to lower the gear. Amazingly the PF got the aircraft down onto the tarmac but without gear extended they were doomed. They most probably would have overrun but I bet they would now trade a runaway excursion for what subsequently happened. So very sad.
But lowering the landing gear wouldn't be a good idea for scrubbing speed and height? I wonder what were they thinking.
beachbumflyer is offline  
Old 28th May 2020, 17:52
  #829 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,819
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by atakacs
I'm still flabbergasted that two passengers walked from this one...

Just out of curiosity does anyone know what type of FDR were fitted on this airframe?
The FDR and CVR are typically BFE (buyer-furnished equipment: the customer gets to choose which vendor's to fit).

That said, by far the most popular choice on narrow-body jets is the L3 FA2100 series (based on the original Fairchild A100, which many of us will recall).

Why do you ask?

Edit: Should have looked at the BEA tweet photos first. Appears to be a Honeywell 980 series.

Last edited by DaveReidUK; 28th May 2020 at 18:20.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 28th May 2020, 18:26
  #830 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by atakacs
Just out of curiosity does anyone know what type of FDR were fitted on this airframe?
It looks to me similar to this Honeywell AR-120 unit. There are 120 minute and 30 minute variants to comply with the 'new' regulations that changed in some places years ago.




Here's the CVR from A321 EI-ETJ which crashed in Egypt in 2015:


Airbubba is offline  
Old 28th May 2020, 18:46
  #831 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,819
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Incidentally, the photo in an earlier post which apparently showed the FDR from the aircraft

Originally Posted by unworry
While everyone is scrambling to find the CVR module, here's a picture of the FDR on site.

Looks like it took quite a knock and may explain why only part of the CVR has been recovered so far



was an L3 unit, so it would appear that the aircraft was fitted with an FDR and CVR from different vendors.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 28th May 2020, 18:59
  #832 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Banksville
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given their speed over the runway, would they ever have gotten the “Retard” prompt?
Joejosh999 is offline  
Old 28th May 2020, 19:03
  #833 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,907
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
It looks to me similar to this Honeywell AR-120 unit. There are 120 minute and 30 minute variants to comply with the 'new' regulations that changed in some places years ago.
Thanks - was wondering how much (read how long) data the investigator would have.
atakacs is offline  
Old 28th May 2020, 19:34
  #834 (permalink)  
wub
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,215
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by krismiler
You're not wrong there !

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9pN591cF1Y

A relative of mine worked for BEA in those days as ground staff and said "Good morning" to a Captain as he walked past him in the corridor. Response was "People like you don't talk to people like me."

Unbelievable these days, but 40-50 years ago things were different.
The other side of the coin is that in those days it was usual for the captain to speak to premium passengers during the flight. On one occasion the captain approached a first class passenger who was reading a newspaper. The captain bid the passenger a good afternoon, at which the newspaper was lowered and looking over the top of his glasses the passenger said, “Did I call you?”.

Last edited by wub; 28th May 2020 at 19:50.
wub is offline  
Old 28th May 2020, 19:45
  #835 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Milano (Italy)
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Joejosh999
Given their speed over the runway, would they ever have gotten the “Retard” prompt?
"The loudspeaker announces RETARD at:
‐ 20 ft, or
‐ at 10 ft if autothrust is active and one autopilot is in LAND mode."

Source: A320 FCOM.
Speed is not mentioned so radio altitude only appears to generate the automatic callout. By the way, their speed was due to the fact that they were on a very steep approach path, apparently, and not because they had too much power applied, so whether the callout was generated or not is not a factor i think.
Grav is offline  
Old 28th May 2020, 20:07
  #836 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Banksville
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Grav
"The loudspeaker announces RETARD at:
‐ 20 ft, or
‐ at 10 ft if autothrust is active and one autopilot is in LAND mode."

Source: A320 FCOM.
Speed is not mentioned so radio altitude only appears to generate the automatic callout. By the way, their speed was due to the fact that they were on a very steep approach path, apparently, and not because they had too much power applied, so whether the callout was generated or not is not a factor i think.
thanks Grav. I’ve been wondering if PF ever retarded throttle at all. As you say their speed was more due to approach energy than power application though.
Joejosh999 is offline  
Old 28th May 2020, 20:46
  #837 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by DIBO
once more youtube nonsense and waste of time.... if there is one undeniable fact, then it's the exact crash location and even that, they managed to get it wrong....
It does have some of the actual audio from the LiveATC.net clips mixed with other sounds like the CRC for the dramatization.

The translation of the Urdu conversation about the runway lighting on departure out of LHE was helpful to me.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 28th May 2020, 21:06
  #838 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Easter Island
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by atakacs
Thanks - was wondering how much (read how long) data the investigator would have.
long enough
Alas para Volar is offline  
Old 28th May 2020, 21:16
  #839 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Leicester
Posts: 73
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Airbubba
Hang on... Isn't that just a pic of Graham Braithwaite on the telly?
DaveJ75 is offline  
Old 28th May 2020, 22:00
  #840 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
More on the discovery of the CVR from Ary News.

Pakistan Rangers official found missing voice recorder from PK-8303 crash: sources

Salah Uddin On May 28, 2020 Last updated May 28, 2020
KARACHI: The person who discovered the missing cockpit voice recorder of the ill-fated PK-8303 is a Pakistan Rangers official, sources privy to the development revealed on Thursday.

Various search parties failed to find the important piece of equipment but in the end a Pakistan Rangers official managed to discover the critical component, sources claimed.

The Deputy Superintendent of the Rangers’ (DSR) name has been revealed to be Waseem.

The voice recorder is of great importance to the ongoing air crash inquiry being conducted by foreign investigators to pin down the reason for the national tragedy.

Prime Minister Imran Khan earlier in the day directed to ensure transparent and impartial investigations into Karachi plane crash that killed 97 passengers and crew members.

Presiding over a high-level meeting in Islamabad to review the latest developments in the investigation of the PIA plane crash, PM Imran ordered to make public all reports on fatal plane crashes occurring in the past.

The prime minister was also briefed about facilities provided to the injured and heirs of the victims.


https://arynews.tv/en/missing-cockpi...ecorder-found/

Airbubba is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.