Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Audit Initiated of FAA's Pilot Training Requirements

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Audit Initiated of FAA's Pilot Training Requirements

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Feb 2020, 22:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Manchester
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Audit Initiated of FAA's Pilot Training Requirements

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
the Chairmen and the Ranking Members of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and its Subcommittee on Aviation requested that we review domestic and international pilot training standards related to commercial passenger aircraft, including the use of automation. Accordingly, our audit objectives will be to (1) evaluate FAA’s process for establishing pilot training requirements for U.S. and foreign air carriers operating U.S.-certificated large passenger aircraft, and (2) review international civil aviation authorities’ requirements for air carrier pilot training regarding the use of flight deck automation.
https://www.oig.dot.gov/library-item/37718
slfool is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2020, 04:03
  #2 (permalink)  
fdr
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 3rd Rock, #29B
Posts: 2,956
Received 861 Likes on 257 Posts
Originally Posted by slfool
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

https://www.oig.dot.gov/library-item/37718
Given the sterling efforts by the Senate in recent days, wouldn't hold breath in expectation of value adding.
fdr is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2020, 08:05
  #3 (permalink)  

de minimus non curat lex
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: sunny troon
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The US Inspector General needs to look no further than the UK CAA CAP 509 syllabus, circa 1988, approved for CPL/IR training conducted by BRITISH AEROSPACE , and probably OATS, Oxford.

Prestwick used the AS 202 Bravo for the 52 hour PPL basic phase, and again for the final GH (PT5) SE phase test.
The only change would be to reduce the 200 hours flying to probably 170-180 hours. The 200 hours was necessary to satisfy the 100 hours P1, prior to SPIC being introduced under JAR.

Turning aircraft upside down is what professional training was lacking prior to the gesture of UPRT now in force.

As for AUTOMATION, separate postings..........do not confuse training for initial licence issue with multi crew operations.

parkfell is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2020, 17:54
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This audit has nothing to do with getting a private or commercial certificate. It will look at how an airline teaches their pilots to operate the particular type aircraft they will be flying for that airline including the use of that aircraft's automation systems.
MarkerInbound is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2020, 20:32
  #5 (permalink)  

de minimus non curat lex
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: sunny troon
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by MarkerInbound
This audit has nothing to do with getting a private or commercial certificate. It will look at how an airline teaches their pilots to operate the particular type aircraft they will be flying for that airline including the use of that aircraft's automation systems.
Whilst I recognise what you are saying, unless the basic training is sound, the type rating training et seq will be compromised. One acid test during the airline phase training is the ability the hand fly using RAW DATA and the ability to TRIM accurately. Then introduction of FLIGHT DIRECTORS and manual trimming; then the AUTO PILOT/THROTTLE.
Read and understand the FMAs.
parkfell is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.