Orange2fly A320 Alpha floor on approach to Muscat
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Orange2fly A320 Alpha floor on approach to Muscat
Would be interested to read the report on this one, to see why the captain elected to continue the approach.
Incident: Orange2fly A320 at Muscat on Jan 28th 2019, Alpha Floor on approach at 210 feet AGL
For those who don’t speak French, alpha floor is the hard AoA protection.
Incident: Orange2fly A320 at Muscat on Jan 28th 2019, Alpha Floor on approach at 210 feet AGL
For those who don’t speak French, alpha floor is the hard AoA protection.
Last edited by Check Airman; 22nd Nov 2019 at 08:56.
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds like the Skipper wanted the FO to do a manual thrust landing (in training?) but forgot to remind the FO that the Athr was off when handing over control. Poor old FO probably put his/her hands on the TL's and did what was normal, ie no movement of the levers til reverse idle! You can see how it could happen, but its poor standards whatever the explanation.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds like the Skipper wanted the FO to do a manual thrust landing (in training?) but forgot to remind the FO that the Athr was off when handing over control. Poor old FO probably put his/her hands on the TL's and did what was normal, ie no movement of the levers til reverse idle! You can see how it could happen, but its poor standards whatever the explanation.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hands on the thrust levers is pointless on the Airbus. It has a lot more value on the aircraft with moving throttles like the Boeing's. Shades of the Korean 777 crash into SFO - exactly what scan was used that never noticed the N1's were at idle and below expected N1's for the approach? What scan was used looking at the speed trend arrow below VLS, then in the zipper, then just prior to achieving ALPHA FLOOR? Aimpoint, airspeed, power has been FLYING 101 forever. It shouldn't change because of autothrottles but the <sad> reality is it has.
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Not At Home
Posts: 2,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Or rushed approach so CM1 takes control with AP/AT off. Back on profile CM1 hands over control to CM2 but they forgot to re-engage AT.
It’s happened before and it’ll probably happen again.
It’s happened before and it’ll probably happen again.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Approach is flown in a lateral and vertical profile but also at certain speed. It's not enough to only manage the profiles. In Bangalore A320 crash static thrust levers with no tactile feed back approach was flown at Vapp-27 kts. alpha floor at 135ft simultaneous TOGA selected but crashed as engines were spooling up toTOGA thrust. In SFO moving throttles (which were at idle through out) plenty of feed back the approach was flown at Vapp-30kts. aircraft crashed during late goaround attempt. Whether it's A or B you cannot fly an approach without frequent glances at your speed. If it's not what it should be then get it there yourself.
Disagree. You have your hands on the thrust levers because they are yours and if the A/T isn’t behaving, your hands are there ready to fix it. Same reason you have your hand on the side stick.
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unfortunately, this is one of those 'environmental capture' dangers that is inherent to the Airbus. You are used to the TL's being just switches to command the Fadecs at certain phases of flight. So, Take off, Cruise and Landing become switch positions, what the engine is actually doing is being handled by the computers. Generally, I was taught to have hands on the TL's up to V1, below 1500' agl and at any time that the autothrust is off. The last one should remind you that the athr is off because it feels 'odd' or non standard to have your hands on them and requesting PM to do Hdg,MCDU and Alt changes for you. I'm aware of a similar occurrence to this one on the 330, where a break down in situational awareness with athr off resulted in a 'scare'.
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To execute a manual thrust landing in the appropriate conditions.
Use it or lose it skill, and having a go in the sim every 6 months doesn't cut it.
This incident might, only might, not have happened if the FO had been more familiar with manual thrust flying.
Use it or lose it skill, and having a go in the sim every 6 months doesn't cut it.
This incident might, only might, not have happened if the FO had been more familiar with manual thrust flying.
As it should be. In airlines that mandate SOPs for full time A/T at all times in route flying ( BA for example ,all types except B744)
The crews never fly the aircraft ‘manually, Manual flying defined as manual control of flight path and speed.
The crews never fly the aircraft ‘manually, Manual flying defined as manual control of flight path and speed.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Manual skill retention.
Because no pilot hunts for the right power, more, less, more, less, more, less, more, less, than a/t's do in gusty or thermal conditions.
Does anyone have stable power criteria in their SOP's for Airbus' with the A/T on? The A/T's do power corrections no pilot is allowed to do using manual thrust, like idle at 350', because it's gotten tired of being 8 kts fast. No pilot would make that drastic an adjustment.
s
Because no pilot hunts for the right power, more, less, more, less, more, less, more, less, than a/t's do in gusty or thermal conditions.
Does anyone have stable power criteria in their SOP's for Airbus' with the A/T on? The A/T's do power corrections no pilot is allowed to do using manual thrust, like idle at 350', because it's gotten tired of being 8 kts fast. No pilot would make that drastic an adjustment.
s
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Manual skill retention.
Because no pilot hunts for the right power, more, less, more, less, more, less, more, less, than a/t's do in gusty or thermal conditions.
Does anyone have stable power criteria in their SOP's for Airbus' with the A/T on? The A/T's do power corrections no pilot is allowed to do using manual thrust, like idle at 350', because it's gotten tired of being 8 kts fast. No pilot would make that drastic an adjustment.
s
Because no pilot hunts for the right power, more, less, more, less, more, less, more, less, than a/t's do in gusty or thermal conditions.
Does anyone have stable power criteria in their SOP's for Airbus' with the A/T on? The A/T's do power corrections no pilot is allowed to do using manual thrust, like idle at 350', because it's gotten tired of being 8 kts fast. No pilot would make that drastic an adjustment.
s