Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

PIA Manchester "Should have gone to Specsavers"

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

PIA Manchester "Should have gone to Specsavers"

Old 10th Jun 2019, 14:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 2,016
PIA Manchester "Should have gone to Specsavers"

Lady passenger mistook exit door for toilet door.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/travel/new...cid=spartanntp
N707ZS is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2019, 16:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 243


Fair one - Easy mistake to make, looks like a toilet door.
USERNAME_ is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2019, 16:13
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Boston
Age: 69
Posts: 443
Originally Posted by USERNAME_ View Post

Fair one - Easy mistake to make, looks like a toilet door.
To be fair the article did state that the exit was adjacent to the rear lavatory, even so....

The article also states that there are normally crew around, of course they might have that wrong.

I would hazard a guess that "alcohol may have been involved".
MurphyWasRight is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2019, 17:17
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: GLASGOW
Posts: 18
Saw one of the cabin crew do that on a Ryan Air 737 at Prestwick . Opened the door forgot to de latch the mechanisim at the bottom of the door and hey presto slide started to inflate . Then tries to shutdoor whilst slide inflating . Mad
CYTN is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2019, 18:14
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Scotland
Posts: 153
Originally Posted by MurphyWasRight View Post
To be fair the article did state that the exit was adjacent to the rear lavatory, even so....

The article also states that there are normally crew around, of course they might have that wrong.

I would hazard a guess that "alcohol may have been involved".
It was a PIA flight, so I would suggest alcohol may not have been a factor but more likely an elderly visiting relatives or someone whom flying isnít an everyday thing. Lots of family from Pakistan where they still live without most modern day appliances, visiting UK based family. They donít get instructions and are really easily confused.
GLAEDI is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2019, 20:50
  #6 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 12,906
Mistaken operation of a door happened to me some years ago. My passengers were told not to touch the doors and wait till I shut down (it was a helicopter) before unstrapping or trying to get out. As the rotors stopped I began to unstrap myself - there was a clunk and clatter as the senior passenger (a Lord Mayor) jettisoned the rear door!
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 10th Jun 2019, 21:01
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: The woods
Posts: 1
Possibly a pee-er wanted to get from the PIA onto the pier... I'll get me hat
bill fly is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2019, 23:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Boston
Age: 69
Posts: 443
Originally Posted by GLAEDI View Post

It was a PIA flight, so I would suggest alcohol may not have been a factor but more likely an elderly visiting relatives or someone whom flying isnít an everyday thing. Lots of family from Pakistan where they still live without most modern day appliances, visiting UK based family. They donít get instructions and are really easily confused.
Good point on alcohol, that is just my default thought whenever I read a headline about something inexplicable, often supported in the article.

In the picture at least the handle does look a bit like a handicapped accessible accommodation of some sort so that may also have have been a factor.
MurphyWasRight is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2019, 11:57
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Centre of Universe
Posts: 310
Daily Mail on line mentioned a Boeing 737-340 and only 37 passengers. Worrying lack of fact checking
Twiglet1 is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2019, 15:42
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: UK
Age: 73
Posts: 614
Daily Mail on line mentioned a Boeing 737-340 and only 37 passengers.
They nearly got it right. It was a Boeing 777-340 so only one number wrong there. They did offload 37 passengers to get the total pax load within limits for departing with one door blocked off (correct number but wrong context). Not too bad for the DM.
Airclues is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2019, 03:28
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Earth
Posts: 663
Originally Posted by Airclues View Post
They nearly got it right. It was a Boeing 777-340 so only one number wrong there. They did offload 37 passengers to get the total pax load within limits for departing with one door blocked off (correct number but wrong context). Not too bad for the DM.
I should expect the guilty party willfully offered themselves to be one of the 37
Officer Kite is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.