Electric Powered Aircraft
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PNW
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looking at the computer rendering of the Eviation above, the thing that strikes me is that it looks exceptionally lightweight, judging by the doors and stairs, and the landing gear. I know composites can be very strong, this just looks to me like it's pushing the limits.
Of course light weight is an advantage for E-power, but I wonder about compromise with safety in hard landings or actual crashes. Maybe the real thing would be less delicate than the rendering looks at first glance, if it ever makes it into production.
Of course light weight is an advantage for E-power, but I wonder about compromise with safety in hard landings or actual crashes. Maybe the real thing would be less delicate than the rendering looks at first glance, if it ever makes it into production.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,158
Likes: 0
Received 42 Likes
on
26 Posts
As said above, it looks like just a dream, without really thinking about it - where does that nosewheel go on retraction; a crosswind will have the props hitting the ground as you kick straight and lower a wing; the tail prop is a worry on rotation for takeoff; asymmetric flight will be a serious problem; and why have 2 sets of airstairs when they could save weight with just one?
There also doesn't look like much room under any floor to place the batteries? They can't be in the tailcone - too far back - and no room in the nose, with the nosewheel strut and wheel, pilot's feet and his big watch.
There also doesn't look like much room under any floor to place the batteries? They can't be in the tailcone - too far back - and no room in the nose, with the nosewheel strut and wheel, pilot's feet and his big watch.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Boston
Age: 72
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As said above, it looks like just a dream, without really thinking about it - where does that nosewheel go on retraction; a crosswind will have the props hitting the ground as you kick straight and lower a wing; the tail prop is a worry on rotation for takeoff; asymmetric flight will be a serious problem; and why have 2 sets of airstairs when they could save weight with just one?
There also doesn't look like much room under any floor to place the batteries? They can't be in the tailcone - too far back - and no room in the nose, with the nosewheel strut and wheel, pilot's feet and his big watch.
There also doesn't look like much room under any floor to place the batteries? They can't be in the tailcone - too far back - and no room in the nose, with the nosewheel strut and wheel, pilot's feet and his big watch.
Could be that the are distributed all over the place, the engine pods look a bit bigger than might be, perhaps some in there as well.
As to hitting props on landing you just need to hit the auto-stop button that brings the wing props to a locked horizontal position in about 0.5 seconds.
I am almost serious on that one, electric motors can have very high torque for short periods so something like that could be possible. Also means they could go from stop to full power quickly as well.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Nashville
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In the March 2019 issue of Flying magazine, aerodynamicist Peter Garrison discusses the feasibility of electric airliners. He says he's long been skeptical this would be possible, barring an unexpected revolution in battery technology. However in an even-handed fashion he reviews the challenges and progress to date. He discusses two current electric regional aircraft projects, Eviation and Zunum.
It's a stretch to call Eviation an "airliner", it's about the size/weight of a Pilatus PC12. They will supposedly be displaying a prototype (don't know if it's flyable) in June of this year. Zunum uses ducted fans, but is so far only a paper airplane.
The backers of these are not attempting to replace traditional airliners, not even smaller regional jets. They understand battery limitations make that impossible. Rather they are hoping to open a new market for short range low cost air taxi service to smaller airports using 8-10 passenger planes. In essence a similar market and service profile to what VLJs originally planned, notably as promoted by the Eclipse 500. Except the electric planes so far under development will have a range of maybe 600 miles, and Garrison doubts that will be achievable on actual aircraft.
It's a stretch to call Eviation an "airliner", it's about the size/weight of a Pilatus PC12. They will supposedly be displaying a prototype (don't know if it's flyable) in June of this year. Zunum uses ducted fans, but is so far only a paper airplane.
The backers of these are not attempting to replace traditional airliners, not even smaller regional jets. They understand battery limitations make that impossible. Rather they are hoping to open a new market for short range low cost air taxi service to smaller airports using 8-10 passenger planes. In essence a similar market and service profile to what VLJs originally planned, notably as promoted by the Eclipse 500. Except the electric planes so far under development will have a range of maybe 600 miles, and Garrison doubts that will be achievable on actual aircraft.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida and wherever my laptop is
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The other problem not raised here is that the Part 135 requirements of remaining endurance will often exceed the total endurance of the aircraft. Currently proponents of electric aircraft seem to be ignoring standard 14CFR regulations as if they are 'special'. This approach is extended to the safe separation standards between aircraft which will greatly reduce the number of 'Jetsons' that can be airborne in urban areas too.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
First Electric powered and now air powered
New aircraft rises 'like a balloon'
By Kenneth Macdonald BBC Scotland special correspondent
Media captionFuture versions of Phoenix could be fitted with cameras and deployed in surveillance workResearchers from the University of the Highlands and Islands (UHI) have helped create a revolutionary new type of aircraft.
Phoenix is an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) designed to stay in the air indefinitely using a new type of propulsion.
Despite being 15m (50ft) long with a mass of 120kg (19 stone) she rises gracefully into the air.
She looks a little like an airship, except airships don't have wings.
"It's a proper aeroplane," says the UHI's Professor Andrew Rae.As the project's chief engineer, he has overseen the integration of Phoenix's systems.
"It flies under its own propulsion although it has no engines," he says.
"The central fuselage is filled with helium, which makes it buoyant so it can ascend like a balloon.
"And inside that there's another bag with compressors on it that brings air from outside, compresses the air, which makes the aeroplane heavier and then it descends like a glider."
It is the key to driving it forward. Phoenix is the first large-scale aircraft to be powered by variable-buoyancy propulsion.
It moves through the air like a porpoise through water.
That means it can travel long distances and stay aloft for long periods.
The point? To create a cheaper alternative to launching satellites.
Image caption Prof Andrew Rae says the Phoenix is a "proper aeroplane" The wings and tail carry solar panels so there is no need to carry fuel aloft.
The quasi-airship shape is based on an aerofoil, meaning it also provides lift like its wings do when the plane moves forward.
Prof Rae, using two wind tunnels at UHI's Perth College campus, led the design of its aerodynamics.
The technique of variable-buoyancy propulsion is already used underwater.
The Scottish Association for Marine Science (also part of UHI) has a small fleet of remotely operated vehicles - they call them gliders - that gather data in the North Atlantic.
They dive deep to collect data, then rise to the surface to transmit it via satellite.
But air is much less dense than water and this has made the principle a trickier proposition for flight.
Phoenix is the first aircraft of its size to use it.
Image caption The central fuselage of the Phoenix is filled with helium It is 15m (49ft) long with a wingspan of almost 11m (36ft)
Production versions would need to be scaled up to reach the altitudes of 20km required to fulfil its intended role.
An autonomous vehicle which is self-sufficient in energy could stay in the air for days, weeks, even months.
The technical term is "ultra-long endurance autonomous aircraft".
The team think it could revolutionise the telecommunications industry.
A Phoenix "pseudosatellite" could do the same job from high in the atmosphere at a fraction of the cost.
Prof Rae says some aircraft can already do this but are complex and expensive.
Phoenix, by contrast, is so cheap as to be "almost expendable".
In addition to UHI, the Phoenix project involves Bristol, Newcastle, Sheffield and Southampton universities.
It also involved four commercial companies and three of the UK's Technology Catapults, and has been part funded by the UK government's innovation agency Innovate UK.
It was used to shelter the aircraft from the winter winds although production versions would operate in all weathers.
The project has involved its partners integrating the solar cells, flight control system, micropumps, carbon fibre wings and tail, reversible hydrogen fuel cell and rechargeable battery.
The last of these is what enables a solar-powered vehicle to keep working all night.
Now that the prototype has flown successfully, the consortium wants to collaborate with major manufacturers to take Phoenix to the next level.
- 23 April 2019https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-48013519
Media playback is unsupported on your deviceExit player
Future versions of Phoenix could be fitted with cameras and deployed in surveillance work
Phoenix is an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) designed to stay in the air indefinitely using a new type of propulsion.
Despite being 15m (50ft) long with a mass of 120kg (19 stone) she rises gracefully into the air.
She looks a little like an airship, except airships don't have wings.
"It's a proper aeroplane," says the UHI's Professor Andrew Rae.As the project's chief engineer, he has overseen the integration of Phoenix's systems.
"It flies under its own propulsion although it has no engines," he says.
"The central fuselage is filled with helium, which makes it buoyant so it can ascend like a balloon.
"And inside that there's another bag with compressors on it that brings air from outside, compresses the air, which makes the aeroplane heavier and then it descends like a glider."
Launch satellites
This ability to "breathe" - to switch quickly between being heavier or lighter than air - doesn't just make the plane go up and down.It is the key to driving it forward. Phoenix is the first large-scale aircraft to be powered by variable-buoyancy propulsion.
It moves through the air like a porpoise through water.
That means it can travel long distances and stay aloft for long periods.
The point? To create a cheaper alternative to launching satellites.
Image caption Prof Andrew Rae says the Phoenix is a "proper aeroplane" The wings and tail carry solar panels so there is no need to carry fuel aloft.The quasi-airship shape is based on an aerofoil, meaning it also provides lift like its wings do when the plane moves forward.
Prof Rae, using two wind tunnels at UHI's Perth College campus, led the design of its aerodynamics.
The technique of variable-buoyancy propulsion is already used underwater.
The Scottish Association for Marine Science (also part of UHI) has a small fleet of remotely operated vehicles - they call them gliders - that gather data in the North Atlantic.
They dive deep to collect data, then rise to the surface to transmit it via satellite.
But air is much less dense than water and this has made the principle a trickier proposition for flight.
Phoenix is the first aircraft of its size to use it.
Image caption The central fuselage of the Phoenix is filled with helium It is 15m (49ft) long with a wingspan of almost 11m (36ft)Production versions would need to be scaled up to reach the altitudes of 20km required to fulfil its intended role.
An autonomous vehicle which is self-sufficient in energy could stay in the air for days, weeks, even months.
The technical term is "ultra-long endurance autonomous aircraft".
The team think it could revolutionise the telecommunications industry.
'Almost expendable'
The oft-quoted rule of thumb in the space business is that putting a satellite into orbit costs its weight in gold.A Phoenix "pseudosatellite" could do the same job from high in the atmosphere at a fraction of the cost.
Prof Rae says some aircraft can already do this but are complex and expensive.
Phoenix, by contrast, is so cheap as to be "almost expendable".
In addition to UHI, the Phoenix project involves Bristol, Newcastle, Sheffield and Southampton universities.
It also involved four commercial companies and three of the UK's Technology Catapults, and has been part funded by the UK government's innovation agency Innovate UK.
Winter winds
The prototype Phoenix has been successfully tested inside the Drystack in Portsmouth, a huge indoor area which normally stores pleasure boats.It was used to shelter the aircraft from the winter winds although production versions would operate in all weathers.
The project has involved its partners integrating the solar cells, flight control system, micropumps, carbon fibre wings and tail, reversible hydrogen fuel cell and rechargeable battery.
The last of these is what enables a solar-powered vehicle to keep working all night.
Now that the prototype has flown successfully, the consortium wants to collaborate with major manufacturers to take Phoenix to the next level.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Europe
Age: 45
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As said above, it looks like just a dream, without really thinking about it - where does that nosewheel go on retraction; a crosswind will have the props hitting the ground as you kick straight and lower a wing; the tail prop is a worry on rotation for takeoff; asymmetric flight will be a serious problem; and why have 2 sets of airstairs when they could save weight with just one?
There also doesn't look like much room under any floor to place the batteries? They can't be in the tailcone - too far back - and no room in the nose, with the nosewheel strut and wheel, pilot's feet and his big watch.
There also doesn't look like much room under any floor to place the batteries? They can't be in the tailcone - too far back - and no room in the nose, with the nosewheel strut and wheel, pilot's feet and his big watch.
As said above, it looks like just a dream, without really thinking about it - where does that nosewheel go on retraction; a crosswind will have the props hitting the ground as you kick straight and lower a wing; the tail prop is a worry on rotation for takeoff; asymmetric flight will be a serious problem; and why have 2 sets of airstairs when they could save weight with just one?
There also doesn't look like much room under any floor to place the batteries? They can't be in the tailcone - too far back - and no room in the nose, with the nosewheel strut and wheel, pilot's feet and his big watch.
There also doesn't look like much room under any floor to place the batteries? They can't be in the tailcone - too far back - and no room in the nose, with the nosewheel strut and wheel, pilot's feet and his big watch.
'Alice' appears to be the same thing - something to bilk money out of gullible investors with no chance of actually working.
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: Mesopotamos
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The hype-to-reality ratio in this area is about 50:1
Unless they can prove it flies as advertised then it only proves that anyone can build a website.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Age: 84
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A great deal of the stored energy in an aircraft is getting from ground level to cruise height.
But, unlike liquid fuel, once used a battery weight remains.
An ‘initial start’ battery pack that would achieve this initial phase then detach and return to base would prevent having to carry the high weight for the endurance of the flight.
But, unlike liquid fuel, once used a battery weight remains.
An ‘initial start’ battery pack that would achieve this initial phase then detach and return to base would prevent having to carry the high weight for the endurance of the flight.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Only occasionally above FL50
Age: 70
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Alice seems to have moved on from being a computer rendered image on a shiny hangar floor to a real prototype st the Paris Airshow. Look here! Presumably arrived by road but apparently due to undergo flight tests this year.
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: The woods
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One big problem with electric aeroplanes is the mains plug... Every time you cross a national boundary you have to change the adapter.
Also all those wires get a bit tangled after a while.
Also all those wires get a bit tangled after a while.
https://www.airlineratings.com/news/...nterest-paris/
