Airlines must be majority EU owned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Cheltenham, UK
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Airlines must be majority EU owned
The FT repeated the “warning” in an article yesterday so I suspect “they”, as in the EU, think they can.
If you want to read the FT piece try googling something like FT EU gives airlines deadline for no-deal Brexit..it might help you avoid a paywall.
If you want to read the FT piece try googling something like FT EU gives airlines deadline for no-deal Brexit..it might help you avoid a paywall.
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: FL410
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This has always been the case.
However, while operating under EU law, this is not an issue, it is once EU membership is renounced.
Simplest solution: revoke article 50 and stay in EU with all its benefits, save billions more than the money you pay into the EU and claim to save for the NHS.
However, while operating under EU law, this is not an issue, it is once EU membership is renounced.
Simplest solution: revoke article 50 and stay in EU with all its benefits, save billions more than the money you pay into the EU and claim to save for the NHS.
Issue ,may be with BA as its owned by IAG and that will have to be >50 % owned by EU citizens whoch may mean Gulf investment comes under scruitiny. UK Govt may demand any UK airline is majority owned by UK citizens which could be an issue and force divestment.Likely BA may concentrate solely on LH and IAG elements do EU flights.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Age: 78
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Welcome to the minefield. It is possible to have an airline which only has one small office and holds an operating certificate.
Everything else can be outsourced as in the (infamous) case of an IOM operation,
What is the EU definition of an airline and ownership ?
Here be dragons.
Everything else can be outsourced as in the (infamous) case of an IOM operation,
What is the EU definition of an airline and ownership ?
Here be dragons.
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: ZRH
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
None of the airlines you cite above operate intra-EU flights necessitating fifth or seventh freedom rights. The legislation affects point-to-point flights inside the EU without stops within the operators home country.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: SV Marie Celeste
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What about the Chicago convention? : Article 6: (Scheduled air services) No scheduled international air service may be operated over or into the territory of a contracting State, except with the special permission or other authorization of that State.
Swizerland is part of the EFTA
Iceland is part of the EEA
Norway is part of the EEA
Any other questions?
Swizerland is part of the EFTA
Iceland is part of the EEA
Norway is part of the EEA
Any other questions?
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: malta
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Permission which needs to be required after a brexit, which can take a while.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Either the back of a sim, or wherever Crewing send me.
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is only for an airline to operate within Europe, eg a flight from say Brussels to Madrid. If the flight is, say, from London to Madrid on a UK airline then this doesn’t change after Brexit. If a “UK” airline wanted to operate within Europe they would have to be European, not British, hence easyJet setting up their Austrian AOC, being European means that at least 51% of them is European owned
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Belgium
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can they actually do this?
sounds like total bollocks
YES THEY CAN AND THIS WAS CLEAR FROM DAY1.....
And it is not
"can they do that"
but
"I didnt realise I voted for this and only now start to realize how the real world works ? I have no [email protected] clue about international traffic rights, my politicians lied to me as they knew but didnt tell me, my newspapers never told me honestly how the real world works and I believed lying Nigel who buggered off the day after the vote and realized what sh!t he had created"
So in short: THIS WAS CLEAR FROM DAY 1 SO CALL YOUR [email protected]@DY MP AND MOAN TO THEM AS THEY HAVE LIED TO YOU, NOBODY ELSE.
Ps: re negotiations: your politicians never told you it have never been NEGOTIATIONS. Under article 50 you have 6 (six) scenarios and you pick one. Your government was aware of this and has had 2 (TWO) year to pick one but they keep telling you we go back to Brussel to negotiate.... Lies, lies and politics... But hey keep dreaming of Rule Brittania and calling it project fear..
Rant over
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Europe
Age: 44
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The elephant in the room is BA and trans-atlantic traffic rights. Divesting enough shares off IAG to make it 51% EU owned and controlled is a big task as it is, made no less complicated by having a single non-EU/non-UK shareholder owning than 20% of IAG (Qatar Airways). However, finding a way to make BA 51% UK owned, whilst simultaneously finding a way to have Iberia, Level, Aer Lingus and Vueling 51% EU owned and controlled, is an impossible task. Put simply, IAG can't be EU and UK controlled at the same time. One could come up with a construction where the individual airlines retain separate ownership, but that would also spell the end for the IAG umbrella.
If BA is less than 51% UK owned and controlled post brexit, transatlantic traffic rights to the US is in serious jeopardy. If IAG is less than 51% EU owned and controlled, Vueling, Iberia, Level and Aer Lingus cannot operate intra-EU flights, which represents 90% of their combined operations.
One possible solution could be to take BA out of IAG completely, with all the competitive disadvantages that would bring. At this point in time, that seems like one of a very few possible scenarios.
What this will undoubtedly mean is, that if you're an airline employee working for BA, your future is in serious jeopardy. Then again, the same can be said for almost every UK based employee and business owner.
If BA is less than 51% UK owned and controlled post brexit, transatlantic traffic rights to the US is in serious jeopardy. If IAG is less than 51% EU owned and controlled, Vueling, Iberia, Level and Aer Lingus cannot operate intra-EU flights, which represents 90% of their combined operations.
One possible solution could be to take BA out of IAG completely, with all the competitive disadvantages that would bring. At this point in time, that seems like one of a very few possible scenarios.
What this will undoubtedly mean is, that if you're an airline employee working for BA, your future is in serious jeopardy. Then again, the same can be said for almost every UK based employee and business owner.
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Belgium
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This was the reason why KLM is still technically a Dutch company too (much to the annoyance of the French and the holding in Paris..) They have a structure that ensure that for traffic right reasons they are Dutch. Took a while to set up and is not easy to replicate for BA in case for a No deal I guess but then I assume they have spend a LOT of money on this already at IAG board level to find a way out of this mess...
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Belgium
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bit harsh, innit ?
But hey, at least you gonna save a ton on payments towards the EU, so the NHS will be a shining example of a health system within weeks from Brexit.
But hey, at least you gonna save a ton on payments towards the EU, so the NHS will be a shining example of a health system within weeks from Brexit.


Harsh? No sheer stupidity of the Brexiteers

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That said, TUI used to be a german owned business (originally called Preussag), and still is based in Hannover, Lower Saxony, Germany. Since a quarter of that is owned by a russian Oligarch, they might need to work hard on the rest of their shareholders.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: SV Marie Celeste
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Most countries (including the EU) require national airlines to be both owned AND controlled by nationals of that country. That means that the majority of directors must be of that nationality too. Quite a problem for ALL UK airlines right now