Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

AAIB identify reason BMI plane skidded off Bristol Airport runway

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

AAIB identify reason BMI plane skidded off Bristol Airport runway

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Feb 2019, 09:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: England.
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AAIB identify reason BMI plane skidded off Bristol Airport runway

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/b...re-100-2414582

December 2017. AAIB report apparently just out.

Skidded off Bristol runway, travelling 120 metres along the grass. Thankfully, nobody hurt, Multiple diversions while it was dug out and moved.

Control was lost by the pilot as the emergency brake was mistakenly selected rather than the speed brake, according to the Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB).



Captain under training, As if that's a valid "reason". Or was the Training Captain also under training? (I obviously jest...I hope).

Scotches the "theories" posted on the Spotters Corner forum. No idea why it started there; out of widespread view, perhaps?

IIRC, not the first time Business Air/bmi regional has been involved in an incident and not the first time involving landings.

Can anyone locate a report of a Business Air (now bmi Regional) Saab landing so heavily it allegedly tore the wheels off? Supposedly at East Midlands Airport, some time ago, IIRC.

Reminds me, if I'm correct, of a bmi Airbus some time ago that landed at Leeds with the parking brake applied. Nobody hurt was the main thing. Must've stopped pretty sharpish; burst main tryres; closed the airport. Wasn't the "reason" along the lines of the pilot responsible being so nervous of landing at Leeds he made the mistake of setting the park brake to on before landing?

In my humble opinion, it's "interesting" to see the bmi name continuing as it so tragically left off.

...arguably in more respects than one.

Last edited by acbus1; 3rd Feb 2019 at 09:53.
acbus1 is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2019, 09:36
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: My views - Not my employer!
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Previous thread here with a link to the AAIB report.
Cough is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2019, 10:05
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by acbus1
Can anyone locate a report of a Business Air (now bmi Regional) Saab landing so heavily it allegedly tore the wheels off? Supposedly at East Midlands Airport, some time ago, IIRC.
Report here. The similarities with the Bristol accident aren't immediately obvious.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2019, 10:34
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hundred Acre Wood
Posts: 264
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by acbus1
Reminds me, if I'm correct, of a bmi Airbus some time ago that landed at Leeds with the parking brake applied. Nobody hurt was the main thing. Must've stopped pretty sharpish; burst main tryres; closed the airport. Wasn't the "reason" along the lines of the pilot responsible being so nervous of landing at Leeds he made the mistake of setting the park brake to on before landing?
No, that wasn’t the reason.
Doug E Style is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2019, 11:33
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by Doug E Style
No, that wasn’t the reason.
Maybe not.

Though the AAIB seemed to think it was:

In the later stages of the approach, the commander inadvertently set the parking brake, instead of the flaps to FULL. He was probably focused on changing weather conditions, because of a previous difficult landing at LBA as well as the numerous wind advisory calls from ATC, the last of which was coincident with the co-pilot's initial request for full flap.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2019, 17:46
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 10 Posts



What a prime example of jackass engineering.
Even with a different shape/color/orientation that’s just asking for trouble.
B2N2 is online now  
Old 3rd Feb 2019, 18:37
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas, like a whole other country
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by B2N2



What a prime example of jackass engineering.
Even with a different shape/color/orientation that’s just asking for trouble.
I could rant on about "human factors" but that's so broad it defies definition in many circles. But at the top of the list is the Human/Machine Interface (HMI). Until that is intelligently addressed and reasonably standardized it will be a tough one to get past. MHO anyway.
Carbon Bootprint is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2019, 19:43
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 724
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Another example of bad, bad design was the 737 door lock access/deny knob and the rudder trim. Caused some serious trouble in Japan I believe.
when manufacturers design a new cockpit, they better ask the actual users about their views concerning the cockpit set-up.
fox niner is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2019, 19:54
  #9 (permalink)  
12A
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: singapore
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The related AAIB bulletin states that there have been previous 'selection of wrong control' events, even when the controls have different locations, shapes and feel.
12A is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2019, 21:38
  #10 (permalink)  
c52
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,262
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
British Midland lost aircraft (source: Aviation-Safety.net)

Argonaut at Manchester when the wrong engine was turned off
737 at EMA when the wrong engine was turned off
F27 at EMA with a simulated engine failure
Viscount at Manchester with a simulated engine failure
Viscount at LHR with engine failure

The first four look like self-inflicted events of remarkable similarity.
c52 is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2019, 22:15
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Whanganui, NZ
Posts: 279
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by fox niner
when manufacturers design a new cockpit, they better ask the actual users about their views concerning the cockpit set-up.
Ask actual users?
What are you smoking, fox?

They have experts in Human Machine Interface design, with PhDs and MBAs and stuff.
Why on earth would you want to ask an unqualified observer like an aeroplane driver with only a miserable undergraduate qualification?

kiwi grey is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2019, 22:32
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloud Cookoo Land
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Another example of bad, bad design was the 737 door lock access/deny knob and the rudder trim. Caused some serious trouble in Japan I believe.
when manufacturers design a new cockpit, they better ask the actual users about their views concerning the cockpit set-up.
Tbh it isn’t a bad design. Location of said items aren’t ideal however the incident in Japan was both unique and, well, silly. The rudder trim is a completely different size and shape to the door access and deny switch. It shouldn’t be one of those things that you misuse in the ‘heat of the moment.’ I really can’t account for what was going on there and I have almost 8K hours on the 737
Callsign Kilo is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2019, 17:25
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just to pick up on something in the original post.
Maybe slightly off topic (maybe not).
Why shouldn't a training captain be under training?
They don't come out of the box fully formed.
16024 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2019, 13:01
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It appears that acbus1 has had some of his bus logic trip off line. Where is the logic in his argument?
NoelEvans is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.