Airlander retired
Thread Starter
Airlander retired
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...herts-46810151
World's longest aircraft retired
The world's longest aircraft has been retired from service as developers prepare to start work on a new model. The £32m Airlander 10 - a combination of plane and airship - had completed six test flights before it collapsed to the ground in November 2017. Hybrid Air Vehicles (HAV), based in Bedford, said it had received Civil Aviation Authority backing to start work on a new craft.
It is hoped the new model will take to the skies in the early 2020s. Stephen McGlennan, chief executive officer of HAV, said: "Our focus is now entirely on bringing the first batch of production standard, type certified Airlander 10 aircraft into service with customers. The prototype served its purpose as the world's first full-sized hybrid aircraft, providing us with the data we needed to move forward from prototype to production standard. As a result, we do not plan to fly the prototype aircraft again."
HAV submitted a £32m insurance claim after Airlander 10 collapsed, which it told shareholders was the "maximum insured value".
The company said it had already had the design of the next airship approved by the European Aviation Safety Agency. It said this now puts them in a "strong position to launch production".
The company carried out its first test flight of Airlander 10 from its former home at Cardington Airfield in August 2016 but left the site in June last year.
In July, HAV revealed that it is to offer "luxury expeditions" when the airship tests were completed.
World's longest aircraft retired
The world's longest aircraft has been retired from service as developers prepare to start work on a new model. The £32m Airlander 10 - a combination of plane and airship - had completed six test flights before it collapsed to the ground in November 2017. Hybrid Air Vehicles (HAV), based in Bedford, said it had received Civil Aviation Authority backing to start work on a new craft.
It is hoped the new model will take to the skies in the early 2020s. Stephen McGlennan, chief executive officer of HAV, said: "Our focus is now entirely on bringing the first batch of production standard, type certified Airlander 10 aircraft into service with customers. The prototype served its purpose as the world's first full-sized hybrid aircraft, providing us with the data we needed to move forward from prototype to production standard. As a result, we do not plan to fly the prototype aircraft again."
HAV submitted a £32m insurance claim after Airlander 10 collapsed, which it told shareholders was the "maximum insured value".
The company said it had already had the design of the next airship approved by the European Aviation Safety Agency. It said this now puts them in a "strong position to launch production".
The company carried out its first test flight of Airlander 10 from its former home at Cardington Airfield in August 2016 but left the site in June last year.
In July, HAV revealed that it is to offer "luxury expeditions" when the airship tests were completed.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You would have thought a news organisation like the BBC could have used a more descriptive and technically accurate phrase than "Collapsed to the ground." It makes it sound like a piece of scaffolding and does not educate anyone unfamiliar with the accident as to whether the causes were it got tangled up in a wire, strong winds, pilot error, design fault etc.
Thread Starter
Well - it is LOCAL NEWS - and very few journalists of any sort have a technical education - in fact few of them can add up beyond 10 ...... plus it's not aimed at people who are interested in aircraft - it's the Public who they wantto read it
I wonder if they'll continue or just trouser the insurance cash - that's probably the wisest thing to do TBH
I wonder if they'll continue or just trouser the insurance cash - that's probably the wisest thing to do TBH
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by c52
Having read in the press the other day that 1800 miles is 1609 km - well, it just underlines my disinclination to trust what I read, and it's a great pity.
Sloppy perhaps, but not the same as disingenuous journalism, which is a much more worrying trend.
Carry on...
Originally Posted by 16024
1800 miles being 1609km is the result of a single keystroke error: a typo.
Sloppy perhaps, but not the same as disingenuous journalism, which is a much more worrying trend.
Carry on...
Sloppy perhaps, but not the same as disingenuous journalism, which is a much more worrying trend.
Carry on...
Which keystroke was that, to get 1609km from 2897 approx?
As for worrying trend, you have looked at the cause of the error, but the reader is only interested in the effect.
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: s e england
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To be fair, the BBC has issued a correction to their original online article, changing the emphasis from the original implication that, because of the 'collapse', the prototype had failed,. The original had also ignored the official approval of the production model. The revised article is now much more positive, and makes it clear that the prototype had been deliberately retired, to allow the manufacture of the approved production model.
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by langleybaston
Oh! Really?
Which keystroke was that, to get 1609km from 2897 approx?
As for worrying trend, you have looked at the cause of the error, but the reader is only interested in the effect.
Which keystroke was that, to get 1609km from 2897 approx?
As for worrying trend, you have looked at the cause of the error, but the reader is only interested in the effect.
The struggle to make 1800 miles equal 1609km by changing a single number might raise an eyebrow or two at OASC.
The rest I agree with.
Originally Posted by 16024
The struggle to make 1800 miles equal 1609km by changing a single number might raise an eyebrow or two at OASC.
The rest I agree with.
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Hopefully, with an aircraft strapped to my backside...
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by langleybaston
Oh! Really?
Which keystroke was that, to get 1609km from 2897 approx?
As for worrying trend, you have looked at the cause of the error, but the reader is only interested in the effect.
Which keystroke was that, to get 1609km from 2897 approx?
As for worrying trend, you have looked at the cause of the error, but the reader is only interested in the effect.
/Al
Edit: I'm significantly unimpressed with Etudiant's ability to beat me to the punch by two minutes. Fake news...
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Auckland, NZ
Age: 78
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pettinger93
To be fair, the BBC has issued a correction to their original online article, changing the emphasis from the original implication that, because of the 'collapse', the prototype had failed,. The original had also ignored the official approval of the production model. The revised article is now much more positive, and makes it clear that the prototype had been deliberately retired, to allow the manufacture of the approved production model.
I know the aircraft is not held up by hot air, but I sometimes wonder about the organisation behind it.
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 59
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Asturias56
I wonder if they'll continue or just trouser the insurance cash - that's probably the wisest thing to do TBH
So they have a production permit but retire the only one they have had. What is the news know? Bit confusing how they changed the story. Will they build another one or is the venture terminated?
Last edited by Less Hair; 14th Jan 2019 at 14:12.
Why all the negativity? What's the "less than stellar record" snark all about? A minor accident early in testing? Followed by a successful test programme. Get a life! How many aircraft would we now be without if they'd been dropped for that reason?
That report is highly positive - they've proved the concept and have gained production approval. There's still a long way to go but it's a British success - or are we all so saturated in gloom and self-flagellation that nothing positive can be said about our wonderful country's positive achievements?
That report is highly positive - they've proved the concept and have gained production approval. There's still a long way to go but it's a British success - or are we all so saturated in gloom and self-flagellation that nothing positive can be said about our wonderful country's positive achievements?
