Air Niugini Aircraft crash, Truk Lagoon
The sources that support the undershoot theory don't seem to agree on how the aircraft ended up pointing away from the airport (we're told that it could have spun round 180° when it hit the water, or that it might have been gradually blown round by the wind).
A photo of the aircraft on final approach, or in the water on the runway heading would back up that theory, but we haven't seen any yet.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Gran Canaria
Age: 59
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The sources that support the undershoot theory don't seem to agree on how the aircraft ended up pointing away from the airport
If it's an undershoot, doesn't it represent either remarkable flying or remarkable luck that it didn't break up? Although, one of the photos suggests to me it's lost its port winglet.
From ASN:
https://aviation-safety.net/database...?id=20180928-0
The aircraft was approaching runway 04 in rain when it hit the water short of the runway.
If the aircraft floated for even a minute or two it could end up facing any direction depending on wind and current. Pretty much meaningless to try and draw any inference from its direction in the pics.
Photos on AvHerald show the aircraft floating tail down with wings under the surface; rear door obscured by a raft but must be nearly submerged. Exit would have been only via the front doors and perhaps the over-wing exits. Just as well there were only 47 on board.
Accident: Niugini B738 at Chuuk on Sep 28th 2018, touched down in sea short of runway
Accident: Niugini B738 at Chuuk on Sep 28th 2018, touched down in sea short of runway
Everything is under control.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Plane crashes near U.S. Navy team, which helps with rescue
U.S. Navy Sailors assigned to Underwater Construction Team (UCT) 2 rendered immediate assistance to the passengers and crew of Air Nuigini flight PX56, after it crashed into the lagoon near Chuuk, Federated States of Micronesia, International Airport, Sept. 28.
If they couldn't see where they were going at 2.2nm to run then obviously they shouldn't have ended up where they did. And if they could see, they shouldn't have ended up where they did either.
Particularly when, as in this case, you get conflicting reports in the press that it was an undershoot, an overrun or even (according to some reports) an RTO - so they can't all be right.
I'm just waiting for someone to post the other sage advice we always get following an incident: "we should wait for the investigation report and avoid speculating in the meantime" - where's the fun in that ?
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: KBOS USA
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
100 feet of water,should have answers soon,U.S. Navy UCT 2 Renders Assistance Following Plane Crash in Chuuk > Commander, U.S. 7th Fleet > Display
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Photos on AvHerald show the aircraft floating tail down with wings under the surface; rear door obscured by a raft but must be nearly submerged. Exit would have been only via the front doors and perhaps the over-wing exits. Just as well there were only 47 on board.
Accident: Niugini B738 at Chuuk on Sep 28th 2018, touched down in sea short of runway
Accident: Niugini B738 at Chuuk on Sep 28th 2018, touched down in sea short of runway
The photos show why!
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One of the reasons so many passengers might have survived before the airline sank into 100 feet of water is the quick work of Navy sailors.
Members of Underwater Construction Team 2 were conducting operations near the lagoon and sailors immediately began shuttling passengers and crew to shore using their inflatable boat, according to the 30th Naval Construction Regiment.
The crew’s chief hospital corpsman rendered medical aid to at least one passenger who sustained minor injuries, Navy officials added.
UCT 2 is working to revamp Chuuk’s wharves and restore the coral reefs that have been damaged by boat anchors.
https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-...e=facebook.com
Members of Underwater Construction Team 2 were conducting operations near the lagoon and sailors immediately began shuttling passengers and crew to shore using their inflatable boat, according to the 30th Naval Construction Regiment.
The crew’s chief hospital corpsman rendered medical aid to at least one passenger who sustained minor injuries, Navy officials added.
UCT 2 is working to revamp Chuuk’s wharves and restore the coral reefs that have been damaged by boat anchors.
https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-...e=facebook.com
Have seen a few too many of these recently, may be time for a change to some of our approaches.
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NZ
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Getting the job done...
Having flown for many years in the Pacific, the reality is that sometimes the lines between IFR and VFR gets blurred...it shouldn't,..but it does....it's how you get the job done. 99.9% of the time it's fine because you use local knowledge and experience to achieve the result. Not ideal but it's the reality. If you've flown in the Pacific or Africa, you'll know what I mean. …...from the photo in the (2) above post, look how low the cloud base is.... suspect these guys were trying to get under the base when they hit the water ?
Last edited by MitrePeak; 28th Sep 2018 at 20:09.
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: uk
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
just to be clear are we clear now that this was an undershoot into the sea on approach to 04, ie the pics fooled us into thinking it had run off the end of 22? They say never believe a sailor but I'll make an exception this time.
EGPWS should detect and alert an undershoot in the area - distance from the runway as deduced from the photographs.
Did this aircraft / operator use EGPWS or some other type of TAWS ?
Did this aircraft / operator use EGPWS or some other type of TAWS ?
As for the photographic evidence and eyewitness reports, they are equally inconclusive.
I'm guessing that, given the airline, the FDR may well go to Australia for analysis. If that's the case, we will know one way or the other soon enough.