Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

EVA Air's 777, continues to destination with injured PAX after turbulence encounter!

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

EVA Air's 777, continues to destination with injured PAX after turbulence encounter!

Old 30th Nov 2017, 04:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: FL250
Age: 43
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EVA Air's 777, continues to destination with injured PAX after turbulence encounter!

https://thepointsguy.com/2017/11/eva...ce-11-injured/

Eva Air plane to Chicago in chaos after severe turbulence | Daily Mail Online

Thought I'd post this here. Didn't hear a peep on other outlets. 11 people injured after encountering severe turbulence. The flight continued with injured pax and crew on board for another 10-11 hours to the destination.

Trying to get an idea, what the community here thinks. We were trained to divert to the closest suitable airport in such scenarios! EVA Air takes pride in being one of the safest airlines in the world, but this doesn't make sense at all!
jackcarls0n is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2017, 05:24
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suppose it depends on the extent of the injuries. Bruises and sprains according to the article. Most airlines have medlink for advice if necessary.

Were you trained to divert to the nearest suitable airport for bruises and sprains with advice from a doctor on board?
JammedStab is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2017, 06:05
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^ What he said. . I could stub my toe and call it an injury. Doesn't warrant a diversion.

If the injuries where minor and medical advice was to continue then I don't see an issue. It may well have been the case that the 11 pax involved where more than happy to continue as well.
AirBumps is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2017, 07:11
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,551
Received 73 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by Jacks
Didn't hear a peep on other outlets.
There's a message there...
Capn Bloggs is online now  
Old 30th Nov 2017, 08:22
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 68
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to an initial report released by Taiwan’s Aviation Safety Council on Friday, the injured “suffered abrasion and contusion injuries” and one of the cabin crew was dealt “a serious injury,” although the extent of that injury wasn’t detailed.
From the first link posted above. Daily Mail link pointless, not sure why anyone things this clickbait site has anything serious to offer, ever.
ExXB is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2017, 06:09
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ban Chiang,Thailand
Age: 67
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most of the output on aviation in the British tabloid press is a waste of bandwidth.
Thaihawk is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2017, 08:21
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps the injured were included in the decision making under good CRM protocols and expressed wishes to continue.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2017, 10:17
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,294
Received 139 Likes on 63 Posts
If I was not overly seriously hurt with on an aircraft heading to my home country I might wish to hang on get it treated and recuperate in my home country rather than some tinpot enroute nation, no matter how good medlink’s suggestion.
compressor stall is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2017, 11:04
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Korea
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Tinpot nations" Japan and Canada?
Euclideanplane is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2017, 14:59
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Age: 79
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I were an injured passenger I would seriously consider the cost of getting home, especially as a medevec, against the chances of my condition getting significantly worse in the hours it takes to get home.

Emergency diversion should only be considered when medical advice requires urgent hospitalisation.
The Ancient Geek is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2017, 16:53
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Middle East
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
8 of the injured were CC, out of 13 on board. If that only leaves 5 fully functioning CC for 11 hours of flight (bearing in mind some injuries to pax too) then I'd be thinking quite hard about heading back home.
reverserunlocked is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2017, 18:16
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 109
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
It may well have left 13 functional cabin crew ... a bruise or a bump doesn't prevent you wheeling a drinks trolley.
paperHanger is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2017, 19:09
  #13 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,141
Received 223 Likes on 65 Posts
True...but that's not the only reason there are cabin crew aboard.
Herod is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2017, 23:59
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Middle East
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quite. If you’ve got 8 CC nursing twisted ankles or wrists then things are going to turn unpleasant in the event of an evac or decompression when you need them all. It’s a far-fetched idea that Murphy will strike twice, I know, but it’s something to consider with 11 hours to go.
reverserunlocked is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2017, 02:39
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Asia
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, if that being the case, an immediate diversion to the nearest suitable does not guarantee an evacuation or decompression will not happen either.
ACJDriver is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2017, 06:32
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 199 Likes on 92 Posts
I think you've rather missed the OP's point.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 27th Dec 2017, 08:56
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Kiwiland
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
In many jurisdictions, ANY injury to flight crew or cabin crew is reportable. That includes a cut lip, split finger nail etc if caused by eg turbulence. We havent a clue what the injuries were so the entire thread is mere speculation.
Radgirl is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.