Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Emirates B777 gear collapse @ DXB?

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Emirates B777 gear collapse @ DXB?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 10:41
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: netherlands
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SunnyUpHere
AVherald reports;

"...was on final approach to Dubai's runway 12L at 12:41L (08:41Z) but attempted to go around from low height. The aircraft however did not climb, but after retracting the gear touched down on the runway and burst into flames...."

Windshear was also reported.

Possibly the crew decided to go around due to windshear, but got caught in it and hit the runway?
This could be a very reasonable assumption.
sleeper is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 10:42
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
Possibly the crew decided to go around due to windshear, but got caught in it and hit the runway?
Looks like some serious damage near the tail skid also which would indicate most likely.
PoppaJo is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 10:44
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Airstrip One
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AP report 282 passengers, 18 crew, no fatalities.
Gridl0k is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 10:46
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
Age: 44
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ImPlaneCrazy

Looks like they were evacuating people right next to the wing that exploded too - if indeed it was the wing, rather than the centre fuel tank exploding.

Still can't believe everyone survived this.
mommus is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 10:46
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,991
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Which is the most important detail.
ACMS is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 10:48
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: EIKY
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If indeed it dropped like a rock from height > 100ft yet the cabin integrity was assured, all pax and crew evacuated .. Well.. god bless the engineers of this aircraft...
daelight is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 10:49
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,907
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Still can't believe everyone survived this.
It is indeed almost miraculous (if confirmed) - but if nothing else reinforce the very good survivability track record of the 777.
atakacs is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 10:50
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
Age: 44
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by daelight
If indeed it dropped like a rock from height > 100ft yet the cabin integrity was assured, all pax and crew evacuated .. Well.. god bless the engineers of this aircraft...
Absolutely. The BA fuel-starvation crash always surprises me for the same reason.

Seems a solid old girl the 777
mommus is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 10:51
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: ALandDownUnder
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


This is the ATC from the link above, very hard to hear much at all, other than EK521 clear to land (response from crew)
log0008 is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 10:51
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: over the horizon
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do we know (hopefully X infinity) that EVAC was complete?
buggerall is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 10:53
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: El Dorado
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by susier
From the AVHerald:

'According to ATC recordings the aircraft performed a normal approach and landing, there was no priority or emergency declared. Upon contacting tower tower reminded the crew of lowering the gear and cleared the aircraft to land. Another approach reported on tower frequency.

About 2 minutes after EK-521 reported on tower tower instructed the aircraft to climb to 4000 feet (no go-around call heard from the crew), the crew acknowledged climbing to 4000 feet, a few seconds later tower instructs the next arrival to go around and alerts emergency services. The position of the aircraft is described near the end of the runway.'
If this is correct, it would be very strange of the TWR having to remind the crew to lower the gear.
Originally Posted by Ollie Onion
It is being reported elsewhere that the aircraft was instructed to go-around by ATC and the aircraft impacted the runway after the gear was retracted.
Perhaps ATC told the aircraft to go around because the gear was never extended in the first place?
LLuCCiFeR is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 10:54
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Post-Pit and Lovin' It.
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Night turnaround. 4 hr sectors. Landing at 12:45pm local. Hmmm....

I would never have guessed anything could go wrong on one of those lovely Annex 1 flights.

nolimitholdem is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 10:57
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Anywhere there are cats to chase.
Age: 25
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That crew were on a 29 hour layover in TRV after deadheading over on the 2nd.
troff is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 10:58
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Moved beyond
Posts: 1,174
Received 89 Likes on 50 Posts
Absolutely. The BA fuel-starvation crash always surprises me for the same reason.

Seems a solid old girl the 777
Not to mention Asiana's cartwheel in SFO.
BuzzBox is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 10:58
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paradise
Age: 74
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surface temperature 49degs, QNH 993 - what kind of density altitude is that? I'm not Triple7 qualified, but what are the operating limits for the type?
Add windshear, a go-around - that's an unfortunate mix.

Last edited by MELDreamer; 3rd Aug 2016 at 11:09.
MELDreamer is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 10:59
  #56 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sometimes even home...
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heard from someone on the ramp that it appeared that the gear was down, aircraft touched down well after midpoint with very high nose up attitude and the other main collapsed on touch down. Very early to speculate but WS?
Aslak is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 10:59
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: El Dorado
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HeartyMeatballs
All we need now is Alex Macheras using accidents for his own sickening self publicity, David Learmount talking rubbish and Geoffrey Thomas proclaiming how 'that would never happen to Qantas' and you have the complete post crash horror show of self proclaimed, self absorbed and self promoting 'experts' showing that they are anything but.

I watch Casualty. Surely that qualifies me to be a healthcare expert?
Yeah, and that complete tw@t on the Clinton News Network: Richard Quest!
LLuCCiFeR is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 11:00
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Escaped the sandpit 53° 32′ 9.19″ N, 9° 50′ 13.29″ E
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nolimitholdem
Night turnaround. 4 hr sectors. Landing at 12:45pm local. Hmmm....

I would never have guessed anything could go wrong on one of those lovely Annex 1 flights.

Any chance that we just wait a little bit and find out what happened before we start throwing the stones?
ExDubai is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 11:03
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Confusio Helvetica
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe it took them a little too long to figure out what the GPWS was on about at 500 feet.
DingerX is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2016, 11:05
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Post-Pit and Lovin' It.
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any chance that we just wait a little bit and find out what happened before we start throwing the stones?
Not throwing stones. I think the use of exceptions to FTL's to squeeze the hours on some night t/a's is outrageous - I still think that.

But if troff is correct, not a factor in this accident. Good to hear.
nolimitholdem is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.