Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Jetstar A321 YMML Incident

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Jetstar A321 YMML Incident

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Dec 2015, 01:57
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jetstar A321 YMML Incident

Some serious questions to be asked.

Full aft is concerning.

On 29 October 2015, an Airbus A321, registered VH-VWT and operated by Jetstar Airways (Jetstar), was scheduled to conduct a passenger flight from Melbourne, Victoria, to Perth, Western Australia. During the take-off roll, the pilot flying noticed that the aircraft was nose-heavy and required an almost full aft control input to raise the aircraft’s nose. Once airborne, the flight crew requested the cabin crew to confirm the passenger numbers and seating locations. The flight crew re-entered the updated information into the flight management computer and identified that the aircraft was outside the aircraft’s loading limits for take-off and landing. Passengers were relocated within the aircraft cabin to return the aircraft to within allowable limits for the remainder of the flight and landing.
wheels_down is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2015, 12:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: middle of nowhere
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This case seems too excessive. There would be errors for balance calculations, but not like this. Surprised to know that.
Is Jetstar using some apps(iPad? Laptops?) for weight and balance?
Does the pilots do it by themselves?

At least, lucky for them to made takeoff...
Umidori is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2015, 21:04
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do we have pilots whose mental arithmetic cannot cross check the data output? Remember 'Garbage in, Garbage out'.
4Greens is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2015, 21:22
  #4 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,321
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by 4Greens
Do we have pilots whose mental arithmetic cannot cross check the data output?
Would you like to suggest an excercise how to keep those skills sharp with regards to incorrectly indcated CG on the loadsheet?

The manufacturer of the aircraft I fly states, that if the CG is within limits for TKOF and trim set also within the limits for takeoff, the A/C is always flyable. Irrespective of the actual position, ie. full FW CG and full aft trim. Is this a feature implemented by virtue or an airworthiness requirement?

Thanks, FD.
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2015, 23:27
  #5 (permalink)  
Resident insomniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
Age: 79
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have several times been a PAX on flights where the front rows of the cabin were 'not to be occupied' so as keep the CofG within limits.
Obviously it was not a fully-occupied aircraft (and there was demand on boarding for those unoccupied seats).
G-CPTN is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.