Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Air Asia Indonesia Lost Contact from Surabaya to Singapore

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Air Asia Indonesia Lost Contact from Surabaya to Singapore

Old 12th Jan 2015, 10:25
  #1821 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Asia
Age: 58
Posts: 126
Does anyone know why they are keeping the CVRs under water?

Is it so that the sea water does not evaporate, and cause a salty residue?
It's to minimise exposure to oxygen, which is the chemical agent of corrosion.
bud leon is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 10:33
  #1822 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SUSSEX UK
Age: 72
Posts: 57
"It exploded because of the pressure," he told reporters in the town of Pangkalan Bun on Borneo island, the search headquarters. "The cabin was pressurised and before the pressure of the cabin could be adjusted, it went down - boom. That explosion was heard in the area."

I am puzzled by this explanation and can only assume that the description given may have suffered some misunderstanding in translation. My guess is that the official is alluding to the sound of the aircraft impacting the ocean, and the pressure being that of the hydraulic surge that would have occurred on impact when water ingress through the ruptured underside of fuselage skin would have scoured through the interior, lifting the floor and bursting through fracture points developed at initial impact .

Some of the physics involved with water impacts was covered in post #3719 from the discussion of AF447 back in 2011.

http://www.pprune.org/tech-log/39510...ml#post6402729

The Hudson river landing (1549) is a good exemplar of the damage that hydraulic forces will induce even in seemingly benign situations (flat calm and smooth landing).

https://avtales.files.wordpress.com/...b-photos-2.pdf

Last edited by BJ-ENG; 12th Jan 2015 at 10:53. Reason: typo
BJ-ENG is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 10:36
  #1823 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,011
(Reuters) - There was no evidence to support the theory that an AirAsia airliner exploded before hitting water two weeks ago, an Indonesian transport safety investigator told Reuters on Monday.

"There is no data to support that kind of theory," said Santoso Sayogo, an investigator at the National Transportation Safety Committee.

Supriyadi, operations coordinator at the National Search and Rescue Agency, earlier told reporters that the wreckage indicated the jet "experienced an explosion" before impact due to a significant change in air pressure.
Kulverstukas is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 10:38
  #1824 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: WA
Posts: 87
Conflicting views between Barsarnas and Indonesia's Transport Safety Investigator thus far. I think it's a little previous calling an "explosion" at this point. All will likely be revealed soon.

No evidence that QZ8501 exploded before hitting water: Investigator - Channel NewsAsia
Blake777 is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 10:42
  #1825 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: On the equator
Posts: 1,295
Originally Posted by BJ-ENG View Post
"It exploded because of the pressure," he told reporters in the town of Pangkalan Bun on Borneo island, the search headquarters. "The cabin was pressurised and before the pressure of the cabin could be adjusted, it went down - boom. That explosion was heard in the area."
That statement is being retracted now, by NTSC safety investigators.

http://www.todayonline.com/world/ind...plosion-theory
training wheels is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 10:44
  #1826 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In transit
Age: 66
Posts: 3,058
I've just listened on the radio to an 'expert' in HKG saying that the aircraft exploded because it was forced by the storm to climb to a height at which the stress of the pressurisation inside the hull caused it to 'burst like a balloon'.
Capetonian is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 11:07
  #1827 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: On the equator
Posts: 1,295
This report in Bahasa says that Navy divers have seen the CVR but it's currently being pinned down by the wing and as a result, they haven't been able to retrieve it today. It's located not far from where they found the FDR, about 20 meters, but because the wing is heavy, they will have to use a "lifting bag" (balloon?) to raise the wing. Hopefully tomorrow it will be lifted (to the surface).

detikNews : Basarnas: CVR QZ-8501 Sudah Terlihat, Tertimpa Sayap Pesawat
training wheels is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 11:12
  #1828 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Usually on top
Posts: 119
@bud leon
Nah mate, this recovery has been pretty abysmal thus far. Look at the photos of the tail section recovery. They won't know what scrape, scratch, break or tear resulted from the crash and which one from the recovery. No post mortems on the bodies recovered thus far... inexcusable. I don't care what religion or other make belief man in the sky you pray to, we (and you) need to know why this happened. Looking at your dead relatives body is what helps us do that. We'll only be a moment, thank you.

Then some rando indonesian investigator makes bizarre statements about exploding hulls, something which clearly they wouldn't have a clue about at this stage.

I can only hope that Airbus is taking the lead on reading out the recorders. And that someone leaks the information on them. Because by golly we'll never know what happened otherwise if Fernandes gets his financially linked buddies in government involved.
physicus is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 11:20
  #1829 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: on a blue balloon
Posts: 324
physicus

Airbus will get a copy of the data pretty swiftly, as will other parties to the investigation. Unless the Indons are capable of creating a false version (I doubt it) the truth will out soon.
oldchina is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 11:22
  #1830 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 13,725
Originally Posted by bud leon View Post
It's to minimise exposure to oxygen, which is the chemical agent of corrosion.
Although they should have moved it from the salt water it was inevitably found in, to fresh water - the salt doesn't help corrosion either.
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 11:35
  #1831 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: On the equator
Posts: 1,295
Originally Posted by oldchina View Post
Airbus will get a copy of the data pretty swiftly, as will other parties to the investigation. Unless the Indons are capable of creating a false version (I doubt it) the truth will out soon.
Anyone remember MI 185 and how the NTSC and NTSB (on behalf of Boeing) came to different conclusions on that one?
training wheels is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 13:09
  #1832 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 9
I am fluent in Indonesian; I’ve seen and heard the original quote by the Barsanas chief.
Regrettably, there was no error in translation. He really is saying that, in his “analysis,” the plane “exploded” on impact with the water, and that the air pressure differential consequent to the impact caused the passengers’ bodies to be expelled from the plane.

Keep in mind that Soelistyo is not an accident investigator; he’s an ex-military general who now leads the mostly civilian search and rescue agency.
While Indonesia does have some good technical experts, Soelistyo is not one of them and there is unfortunately not a culture of message discipline here.
Expect more premature and cringe-worthy conclusions to be aired: The first was the meteorological agency; the second (and very much under-reported) was last Thursday’s announcement by Santoso Sayogo, the NTSC (Indonesia’s NTSB) lead investigator, that the ping locators will no longer needed, since the tail had been found — even though, at that point, no pings had been detected from the tail; and now Soelistyo’s gaffe.

The best reading of Soelistyo’s remarks is as a “just-so” story to explain the absence of victims’ bodies from the fuselage, which the Indonesian public widely expected to be still strapped into their seats. In remarks as recently as Sunday, Soelistyo repeatedly stressed that the recovery mission will prioritize recovery of victims’ bodies over that of the black boxes. Now he has to explain why the divers under his command surfaced with boxes and not bodies.

The NTSC’s Sayogo should be lauded for quickly rejecting Soelistyo’s speculation: “There is no data to support that kind of theory,” he said a few hours ago. You need some courage to do that to a general here — and one on whom your investigation depends for operational and logistical support.
LaissezPasser is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 13:25
  #1833 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 9
Just a minor correction - autopsies have been performed on some of the bodies, but not all (or even most). I gather family opposition is the main reason.
Yep, they're doing autopsies on all the foreigners, on presumption of family permission. Autopsies on the Indonesians only if the family permit. There was a church group onboard, so the ME might get higher consent rates than with more Muslims on board.
LaissezPasser is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 13:25
  #1834 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,257
Nah mate, this recovery has been pretty abysmal thus far. Look at the photos of the tail section recovery. They won't know what scrape, scratch, break or tear resulted from the crash and which one from the recovery. No post mortems on the bodies recovered thus far...
No professional investigator or materials engineer would be confused by scrapes or scratches from the recovery effort.

And post-mortems are performed for each and every body recovered so far. This was already explained before.

It's worth to re-quote bud leon:

"If you are just going to take barely-informed pot shots from the sidelines, it says more about you than it does about them."
peekay4 is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 13:44
  #1835 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Schiphol
Posts: 338
Answer to mm43 - FDR and CVR coordinates

3°37'20.7"S 109°42'43"E --------- acc.to A0283’s plot, new object, so probable CVR,
3°37'21.13"S 109°42'42.45"E -----acc.to A0283’s plot, coordinates published for FDR,

offical, previously stated FDR coordinates were:

3°37'21"S109°42'42"E

but they are 21.7 meters apart.

offical,previously stated distance estimate 20m,

A0283 addition - Taking mm43's 21.7 meters. And the offical statement that the
FDR was stuck under 'the' wing. CVR appears to be too. If we take a wingspan value
of 35.80 meters ... An 'intact' wing could easily cover both locations.

Last edited by A0283; 12th Jan 2015 at 14:03. Reason: Add wingspan
A0283 is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 13:44
  #1836 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,257
Picture from Antara News:



This appears to be an L-3 Aviation FA2100 Solid-State FDR.
peekay4 is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 13:45
  #1837 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: On the equator
Posts: 1,295
Originally Posted by matkat View Post
Stu/Blake if the seat was from the cockpit it may well be the engineer previously mentioned and manifested.
I believe the engineer's body has been recovered (based on the obituary postings on FB from those who knew him). And engineers who accompany flights which is common in Indonesia normally sit in the cabin (something to do with cockpit authority gradient) and usually at the back or emergency exit row if not taken by a passenger who has paid more for the extra legroom.
training wheels is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 13:54
  #1838 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 109
@TWheels

..engineers...normally sit in the cabin (something to do with cockpit authority gradient)..
Your sure of this are you.....less to do with SOP??
sAx_R54 is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 14:36
  #1839 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Clinton WA
Age: 71
Posts: 74
Debris recovery, media, 'explosion', 3km

peekay: "No professional investigator or materials engineer would be confused by scrapes or scratches from the recovery effort."

I don't know if I would go that far, but the recovery crew needs to be cut some slack. My first reaction on the winch-aboard' was 'they're squashing it'. But the "tail" was more like a paper bag ripped open than an airplane, with one heavy, rigid piece (v stab) still attached. The 3D structural strength of the tail portion below water was insufficient out of water. The entire section would have required a redundant structure built around it to maintain the section's shape. The subsurface work would have to be performed over days with little visibility in what amounts to a cyclone of current flow. And there are more pieces waiting to be recovered.

News media so far is reinforcing the observation that there is nothing it can be told that it cannot screw up, misinterpret, take to the most illogical extreme, ignore language differences, fail to ask for clarification, or let die as inaccurate. We can be sure that every blind alley and patently false notion will be given equal, or sometimes even more earnest, concerned emphasis than clear statements of fact. We can further anticipate the errors, misinterpretations etc etc etc will be repeated and repeated and repeated by photogenic but otherwise clueless talking heads, referencing one another and welcoming false prophets and experts chosen for their dialectic positions until falsehoods approach the refined virtual news reality which is where news viewers are expected to function and like it. The statement of 'explosion by air pressure' is interesting, but has already been grabbed by media and morphed into Frankenstein. PPRuNe is a place supposedly sheltered from such media fallout but is not immune to it.

3km between FDR/CVR and tail section is a significant distance on smooth paving, and farther on water. We are lacking the early stages of a debris field map, overlays of current, and updates. Hopefully they will begin appearing.
Leightman 957 is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 14:56
  #1840 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Leeds
Posts: 199
I think 3km is a lot I'm sure a 6kt current can't move 20kilos of metal that's sat in the sand
Livesinafield is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.