Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Air Asia Indonesia Lost Contact from Surabaya to Singapore

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Air Asia Indonesia Lost Contact from Surabaya to Singapore

Old 3rd Jan 2015, 09:31
  #1081 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Yangon,Myanmar
Posts: 51
Budi Sampurna, a professor at the University of Indonesia and member of the forensic team responsible for identifying bodies from the crash, said one autopsy had already taken place, but he didn’t comment on the cause of death. He also didn’t say how many other autopsies were planned.
via the Wall Street Journal

just to confirm autopsies have been performed
chefrp is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2015, 09:32
  #1082 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: LAX
Posts: 68
Any information on his age?
53 IIRC.

@chefrp I wish it were that simple. The flying public has shown time and time again that it will do anything to save $5. Even if saving that $5 costs them $50 in fees. What you're proposing by implication is an education campaign by pilots that has a steep hill to climb in convincing people that safety is worth a little extra. People will cram themselves into 28 inch pitch seats over a few dollars. If they won't pay a bit extra for their own comfort, the statistical unlikelihood of an accident makes it unlikely that they will pay for an extra safety margin.
mseyfang is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2015, 10:03
  #1083 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: US
Posts: 64
Times Strait reports:

PANGKALAN BUN/JAKARTA – Indonesia’s transport ministry will investigate all Indonesia AirAsia flight schedules from Monday as part of a government probe into Flight QZ8501 that went missing almost a week ago.

This comes as the ministry said flight QZ8501 was on an unauthorised flight schedule because the airline was only permitted to fly the Surabaya-Singapore route on Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. Flight QZ8501 took off last Sunday and the airline had not sought permission to change its schedule prior to the flight.

“We are going to investigate all AirAsia flight schedules,” said Djoko Muratmodjo, acting general-director for air navigation in the transport ministry. “Hopefully we can start on next Monday. We won’t focus on licences, just schedules.”

“It might be possible to revoke AirAsia’s licence in Indonesia,” Muratmodjo added.

The transport ministry suspended AirAsia's Surabaya-Singapore route on Friday. "AirAsia's permit for the route has been frozen because it violated the route permit given," he said.

The airline said it would cooperate fully with the investigation and would not comment on the matter till the investigation is completed.

The ministry said "customers who have booked AirAsia's Surabaya-Singapore tickets should be compensated with other airline tickets as per the existing regulation."
BG47 is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2015, 10:46
  #1084 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 19
Just to second that it seems autopsies are being done, just not on every body. Which is understandable given the circumstances and in some cases pointless.

AirAsia flight QZ8501: Another 12 bodies sent to Surabaya hospital for identification - South-east Asia News & Top Stories - The Straits Times

Autopsy will be performed on some of the bodies to support an investigation into the crash, Xinhua news agency quoted head of the Disaster Victim Identification (DVI) center Budiono as saying.

"Some of them will be autopsied to find out the cause of the accident," he said at the Police Hospital Bhayangkara in Surabaya, the provincial capital of East Java.

"We will conduct autopsy at least on bodies of the pilot, co-pilot,'' he was quoted as saying.
Silver Pegasus is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2015, 11:19
  #1085 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: UK
Age: 51
Posts: 70
Originally Posted by BBC News
Meanwhile, the Indonesian weather agency has said that bad weather was the "biggest factor" behind the crash.
that will save a lot of time on tedious investigations.
Interested Passenger is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2015, 11:58
  #1086 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 1,548
Thank you, Dave Reid, for that very useful link to the full UK AAIB report on the Boeing 737 stall - a full stall, NOT just the approach to the stall - that took place on approach to Bournemouth on a flight from Faro on 23 Sept. 2007.

As nobody got hurt and it was early in the day at a quiet airport, the details of the incident got lost in the bureaucracy, and only a sharp eyed chap in the back office flagged up the true significance. By that time the airliner and the pilots involved had been flying as usual, for several weeks, without sharing the experience with the authorities....which means the Black Boxes had gone on to other things. However the pilot did talk to the company engineer, who assured him the data had been saved on the OFDM, or operational flight detail mentoring, which was sent to the company by mobile phone. And THAT's how the scary charts and details were saved and then studied by the AAIB.

Quite simply, they didn't monitor the airspeed. The auto throttle had disconnected and the warning light wasn't noticed.

And as Jimjim has posted here, if you intuitively apply FULL power, underslung engines can tip up the aircraft so that the elevator is not so effective. A balance has to be achieved, by using trim, power, AND elevator to recover from a full stall. Airline pilots reading this, please have a good look at that AAIB full report referred to by DaveReid. It was not an Airbus, it was an elderly Boeing. and it was not an Asian Airline, nor overly deferential Asian pilots, they were both British, well trained and fully experienced.

They probably overlooked the inconspicuous warning light on the Boeing panel that the autothrottle had disconnected. With everything hanging down, the engines, the flaps, the spoilers, here goes the STALL STALL STALL noise, and what do you do 800 feet from the runway at a speed of 82 knots? Well, it pitched up 33 degrees, they did very well to go around.

All in a day's work. But what is different about having everything go pearshaped in a Cunimb at 38,000 feet? Should have plenty of time to sort things out, and those who fly in these latitudes are experienced in interesting conditions.
mary meagher is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2015, 12:25
  #1087 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Sweden
Age: 43
Posts: 443
mary_meagher

the full UK AAIB report on the Boeing 737 stall - a full stall, NOT just the approach to the stall - that took place on approach to Bournemouth on a flight from Faro on 23 Sept. 2007.
An eerily similar event took place by Iceland Air in Oslo, Norway, a few years ago. They came in for landing and messed up big time. Many passengers had brown pants... Capt didn't report it as he should have, it was only by reading out the FDR due to some other trouble that the incident was discovered (as I recall it...). I have the report on my computer somewhere but can't seem to find it right now on the Internet. You can look for it here:

Avgitte rapporter - luftfart | sht
MrSnuggles is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2015, 12:44
  #1088 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Tree
Posts: 222
From one Monkey to another.

" Is there anyone on this thread who actually wants to discuss about AIR ASIA QZ 8501??"

My gut tells me we are. I hope I am wrong but time will tell.
Sop_Monkey is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2015, 14:17
  #1089 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,949
Coincidentally a very interesting discussion on BBC R4 this morning from the author of "The Glass Cage" concerning man's interaction with automation - listen to the end to hear quite a lot about aviation.

Here is the link - start listening at 1.20.55:-

The Glass Cage
fireflybob is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2015, 14:18
  #1090 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 52
Presumably the reports that they had no authority to fly that route are just a red herring, or is there a suggestion that as the paperwork for the flight schedule is not correct there may be other issues with paperwork?

Equally how did the Indonesians allow the flight to be booked, and depart etc as after they must have known it was happening.
ChrisGr31 is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2015, 14:33
  #1091 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Flyin' low and feeling mean
Posts: 185
Looks like they are getting close to the main wreckage field

Indonesian officials said Saturday that they were confident wreckage of AirAsia Flight 8501 had been located after sonar equipment detected four massive objects on the ocean floor.

The biggest piece, measuring 18 meters (59 feet) long and 5.4 meters (18 feet) wide, appeared to be part of the jet's body,
“I can confirm that these are parts of the plane we are looking for,” said Bambang Soelistyo, head of Indonesia’s National Search and Rescue Agency.

Search teams again battled high waves and struggled to lower a remotely operated underwater vehicle to capture clearer images of the objects on the sea floor at a depth of about 100 feet.
Hogger60 is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2015, 14:42
  #1092 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: US
Posts: 64
AirAsia was limited slots due to nearing it’s quota for flying people to Singapore

Fox News reports:

"So AirAsia has committed a violation of the route that has been given to them," Barata told The Wall Street Journal. He said the company's flights from Surabaya, Indonesia's second largest city, to Singapore had consequently been suspended on Friday.

AirAsia used to have permission to fly the route daily, but the number of slots was cut for the period Oct. 26 to March 28 because the country was nearing its quota for flying people to Singapore, said Indonesia’s acting director general of aviation Djoko Murjatmodjo. He didn’t say if other airlines also had their slots reduced.

Murjatmodjo added that AirAsia had been flying the route on Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays and Sundays rather than the four days designated by the Transportation Ministry. He said the ministry is investigating why AirAsia was flying the route outside its permitted schedule. The probe will include an investigation of the ministry.

"Frankly speaking, it's a bit late for us to find out about this," he said. "One thing that's certain is the days that they are flying aren't the same as the days they were given. There was no request for changes."
BG47 is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2015, 14:44
  #1093 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,949
Presumably the reports that they had no authority to fly that route are just a red herring, or is there a suggestion that as the paperwork for the flight schedule is not correct there may be other issues with paperwork?
Sounds a bit political to me more than regulatory.
fireflybob is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2015, 15:01
  #1094 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: glendale
Posts: 822
AGAIN, any airbus guys ...CAN THE PLANE JUST HOLD PITCH AND WINGS LEVEL BASED ONLY ON GYRO AND NOT WITH AIRSPEED OR ALTIMETER INPUTS?

and

underslung engines...well a long time ago most of us realized that if you add power the nose goes up

so, throttles forward, stick forward and everything is dandy
glendalegoon is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2015, 15:06
  #1095 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Frankfurt
Age: 69
Posts: 36
Greenwich is in the centre.

That is Greenwich, London UK, not Greenwich Utah or Greenwich King Edward Island etc.
DrPhillipa is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2015, 15:31
  #1096 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 37
Originally Posted by glendalegoon View Post
AGAIN, any airbus guys ...CAN THE PLANE JUST HOLD PITCH AND WINGS LEVEL BASED ONLY ON GYRO AND NOT WITH AIRSPEED OR ALTIMETER INPUTS?

and

underslung engines...well a long time ago most of us realized that if you add power the nose goes up

so, throttles forward, stick forward and everything is dandy
How?

Thrust will lift the nose, and the elevators don't have enough effect (due to low airspeed) to correct.

Not so dandy.
Msunduzi is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2015, 15:48
  #1097 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In transit
Age: 66
Posts: 3,059
AirAsia Flight 8501 did not have permission to fly to Singapore on the day it crashed into the Java Sea, transport officials have said ...................

However, the company was only authorised to fly that route on Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays, Indonesia’s transport ministry said.

"It violated the route permit given, the schedule given, that's the problem," Djoko Murjatmodjo, the head of air transport, told AFP on Saturday.

It was not immediately clear why AirAsia had been flying that day if it did not have permission. All the company’s flights from Surabaya to Singapore have now been ordered to stop. The transport ministry has announced a full review of all AirAsia flights.
Presumably a flight plan was filed so I do wonder how the (supposed) breach of operating permit can be deemed as 'the problem'.
Capetonian is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2015, 16:08
  #1098 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: VA, USA
Age: 53
Posts: 555
On topic, eh?

Is there any chance this thread could stay on topic, i.e. AirAsia 8501?

At this point for every one post about 8501, there are 20 posts about other flights, that are supposed, through some assumed causal relation to 8501, but mostly that link is simply "they crashed"....

There is some news from the search teams, there is some wreckage being recovered, so why aren't the clues that this information that is available being discussed?

One thing we can rule out is the aircraft landed intact on the ocean surface as some of the more radical news outlets tried to propose. I say this based on the wreckage we have seen pictures of and the number of bodies.

However, can we rule out some level of in-flight breakup at this point? I feel not, however if there is any evidence to the contrary let's discuss.

But all this talk of other aircraft loses seems at best a waste of bandwidth. We have no idea which, if any of these, are related. I suspect we can only start down that path when the FDR/CVR data is available.
GarageYears is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2015, 16:42
  #1099 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: On the equator
Posts: 1,295
Originally Posted by Capetonian View Post
Presumably a flight plan was filed so I do wonder how the (supposed) breach of operating permit can be deemed as 'the problem'.
Funny enough, the CAAS from Singapore reported that Air Asia had approval from them to operate daily. This is quite typical of Indonesian bureaucracy to focus on petty things such as this to distract the world away from the bigger issues. It has been reported that the new Minister for Transport Ignasius Jonan stormed in to the headquarters of Indonesia Air Asia yelling and screaming at flight operations staff demanding why the Air Asia flight could have departed without receiving a weather briefing from the briefing office.

The simple answer was probably, that early in the morning, none of his briefing officers were ready for duty. I've operated from Surabaya for 4 years often doing the early morning red eye from Surabaya to Bali with a 0600 departure. We call Juanda ground at 0550 for ATC clearance and push back and often there is no answer because the airport doesn't officially open until 0600. If you take off before 0600, then there is a 2 million rupiah fine and some carriers like Air Asia and Citilink seem to be happy to pay the fine so that they can maintain their schedules.

Because of this, our dispatchers and most other airlines also too, obtained weather information from the Bureau of Meterology through their online service, when the Briefing office was 'unavailable'. And according to this article, the Indonesian DGCA does not have a problem with that, which pretty much puts egg on the face of the Minister for Transport.

Last edited by training wheels; 3rd Jan 2015 at 16:52. Reason: spelling
training wheels is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2015, 16:44
  #1100 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Asia
Posts: 284
Coincidentally a very interesting discussion on BBC R4 this morning from the author of "The Glass Cage" concerning man's interaction with automation - listen to the end to hear quite a lot about aviation.

Here is the link - start listening at 1.20.55:-

The Glass Cage
Interesting indeed.
I saw this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mt8ooCms4sE

and you clearly understand why planes goes down once the automation fails.
Greenlights is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.