Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Southwest Captain Reduced Power Before NYC Crash Landing

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Southwest Captain Reduced Power Before NYC Crash Landing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Nov 2014, 22:48
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: South Alabama
Age: 74
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Iceman

From what I read, she was using the HUD to fly the ILS, and was concentrating on that.

From the NTSB report, the ILS and the Visual do not match, by a lot.
Old Boeing Driver is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2014, 23:25
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: South Alabama
Age: 74
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Glendale

In the 707, one would try to touch the rear tires of the trucks on the runway, and let off a little yoke pressure for a grease on.

I think I did that....once.
Old Boeing Driver is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2014, 11:01
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
... calculated from multiplying the stall speed (Vs) by a multiplier of 1.3 (commonly seen as 1.3Vs)
That's old school... these fancy new planes have Vref = 1.23 Vsr0
peekay4 is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2014, 16:52
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll Try Once Again ---

Even though I can recognize that some have seen my posts, evidenced by their response (including quotes) ... for example: peekay4's post of 22nd Nov 2014 07:01, referenced an earlier post of mine that had apparently gone missing somewhere in the "land of cyberspace" ... but, never let it be said that I'm not opinionated, so ... once again ...

Originally Posted by flyingchanges

Quote:
The factors that makes up an understanding of airplane landings includes both the airspeed (based on 1.3Vs increased by any wind/gust factor), where the 30% increase in this speed is gradually reduced to “zero” by reaching the threshold, while maintaining the other adjustments

What? Are you suggesting a 30 knot reduction from VAPP at the threshold.
Hello flyingchanges:

NO! NO! NO! NO! MY BAD! MY BAD! A THOUSAND apologies … to all here!!!!!!

When I read your post, I immediately went back to re-read what I thought I had posted … and almost fell out of the chair!!

As I sometimes find myself attempting to address several issues, from several widely different sources, and doing so all at once, cutting and pasting, rewriting some areas of some issues, etc. Generally I come close to keeping all the balls in the air … except for the rare bounce. This was different. I apparently did my cut’n’paste routine and then, like a blind idiot, selected the remainder for posting on PPRuNe which omitted all my cut’n’paste efforts! I went back through my notes, hoping to find what I had written, but I guess I dumped all of that as well. So – let me try again.

What I should have said is the following:

One of the significant factors that make up an understanding of airplane landings is the airspeed to be maintained on final approach … and is referred to as “Vapp.” This would be the airspeed to maintain on final, and is calculated from multiplying the stall speed (Vs) by a multiplier of 1.3 (commonly seen as 1.3Vs) and is then increased by the reported wind value and any gust factor. Once determined, this airspeed is maintained until approaching the runway threshold … where a reduction of that airspeed should begin … so that the airspeed when arriving over the threshold should be 1.3Vs plus the gusting wind value.

Wake up call acknowledged!
AirRabbit is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2014, 17:17
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by peekay4
(My Comment)
... calculated from multiplying the stall speed (Vs) by a multiplier of 1.3 (commonly seen as 1.3Vs)
(peekay4’s Comment)
That's old school... these fancy new planes have Vref = 1.23 Vsr0
I guess that show’s my age – but I’m glad that the industry is progressing to the point where we can be exposed to a process that uses more precise thinking than “rounding up to the next highest integer” for safety’s sake ... derived out of a concern that professional aviators would be flummoxed by having to deal with “two decimal places,” particularly those ending with an “odd” number value.
AirRabbit is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.