Virgin Atlantic VS98 damaged on landing by Christmas Eve flash flood in St Lucia?
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: in the here and now
Virgin Atlantic VS98 damaged on landing by Christmas Eve flash flood in St Lucia?
Several islands in the Eastern Caribbean (St Vincent, St Lucia, Martinique and Dominica) had unexpected extreme rainfall on Christmas Eve causing landslides and flooding with a number of rivers bursting their banks. Confirmed deaths are 5 in St Lucia 8 in St Vincent with many getting stuck while doing Xmas shopping and not able to get home due to bridges/roads washed away. Midnight Mass was cancelled which - if you know the Caribbean - speaks volumes!
One of the incidents being reported was that VS 98 on its way from Crown Point Tobago to UVF Hewanorra, St Lucia was just cleared to land (approx 19.00LT) when the Vieux Fort river burst its banks sending a muddy wave through the terminal and over the runway.
The Virgin aircraft is reported to have sustained substantial damage to its landing gear - other reports suggest "a hole in the plane" bad enough to need a team flown in. Photos show the Hewanorra (TLPL)terminal under a foot of water.
Part of the problem seems to be that the Met radar in Martinique has been unservicable and other islands rely on those images for disaster preparedness. The St Lucia Met Office did not even put out their normal 18.00LT report on the 24th (and no reports on the 25th) as their equipment had been washed away.
Can anyone give any more information?
One of the incidents being reported was that VS 98 on its way from Crown Point Tobago to UVF Hewanorra, St Lucia was just cleared to land (approx 19.00LT) when the Vieux Fort river burst its banks sending a muddy wave through the terminal and over the runway.
The Virgin aircraft is reported to have sustained substantial damage to its landing gear - other reports suggest "a hole in the plane" bad enough to need a team flown in. Photos show the Hewanorra (TLPL)terminal under a foot of water.
Part of the problem seems to be that the Met radar in Martinique has been unservicable and other islands rely on those images for disaster preparedness. The St Lucia Met Office did not even put out their normal 18.00LT report on the 24th (and no reports on the 25th) as their equipment had been washed away.
Can anyone give any more information?
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 147
Likes: 15
From: London
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: in the here and now
Now being reported on Av Herald:
A Virgin Atlantic Airbus A330-300, registration G-VNYC performing flight VS-98 from Tobago (Trinidad and Tobago) to Saint Lucia (Saint Lucia), was on final approach to Saint Lucia at about 20:14L (00:14Z Dec 25th) and had just received landing clearance when river Vieux Fort burst its banks and flooded the airport reportedly washing the weather station away and setting the runway under water. The aircraft touched down on the flooded runway without warning and managed to come to a stop. No injuries occurred, the landing gear however received substantial damage.
A Virgin Atlantic Airbus A330-300, registration G-VNYC performing flight VS-98 from Tobago (Trinidad and Tobago) to Saint Lucia (Saint Lucia), was on final approach to Saint Lucia at about 20:14L (00:14Z Dec 25th) and had just received landing clearance when river Vieux Fort burst its banks and flooded the airport reportedly washing the weather station away and setting the runway under water. The aircraft touched down on the flooded runway without warning and managed to come to a stop. No injuries occurred, the landing gear however received substantial damage.
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: in the here and now
AV Herald now has a photo - substantial damage. Couldn't copy it to here but it can be found on that site.
Accident: Virgin A333 at St. Lucia on Dec 24th 2013, mud landing on runway
Accident: Virgin A333 at St. Lucia on Dec 24th 2013, mud landing on runway
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 270
Likes: 140
From: Ontario, Canada
So maybe I'm lacking in imagination here, but how did flooding cause this kind of damage?
Is the fuselage damage from water sprayed up by the landing gear? Was it enough depth of water (eg 30 cm or so) that it was almost like a "ditching" on the initial impact/touchdown?
Is the fuselage damage from water sprayed up by the landing gear? Was it enough depth of water (eg 30 cm or so) that it was almost like a "ditching" on the initial impact/touchdown?
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 881
Likes: 67
From: UK
the river nearby broke its banks just before a/c touched down and the flood water contaminated the airfield and runway
consequently much debris which included an LD3 container was on the runway and the the A330 hit it as it touched down
its all in the links above if you care to read
consequently much debris which included an LD3 container was on the runway and the the A330 hit it as it touched down
its all in the links above if you care to read
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,687
Likes: 2,030
From: Reading, UK
consequently much debris which included an LD3 container was on the runway and the the A330 hit it as it touched down
its all in the links above if you care to read
its all in the links above if you care to read
Apart from being unsubstantiated, it's hard to reconcile that story with Virgin's statement that "the damage is confined to non-structural parts of the aircraft, we only lost a number of fairings and panels."
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Northern Territory Australia
RE VS98 UVF
Have a look here
Accident: Virgin A333 at St. Lucia on Dec 24th 2013, mud landing on runway
Pretty nasty incident but kudos to the crew
Accident: Virgin A333 at St. Lucia on Dec 24th 2013, mud landing on runway
Pretty nasty incident but kudos to the crew
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 3,038
Likes: 52
From: .
All I can see to support that theory is a quote on AvHerald: "Rumor is the G-VNYC's belly [sic] collided with an LD3 on touchdown." (my emphasis)
Apart from being unsubstantiated, it's hard to reconcile that story with Virgin's statement that "the damage is confined to non-structural parts of the aircraft, we only lost a number of fairings and panels."
Apart from being unsubstantiated, it's hard to reconcile that story with Virgin's statement that "the damage is confined to non-structural parts of the aircraft, we only lost a number of fairings and panels."
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,687
Likes: 2,030
From: Reading, UK
Do you know the 330, do you know what are structural and non-structural parts?
In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, I'm happy to accept the airline's assertion that only non-structural fairings were damaged.
That doesn't sound to me like hitting an LD3 (even an empty one) at touchdown, hence my scepticism. Not to mention the absence of any photos of mangled baggage containers ...
