Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Alitalia A320 partial gear up in Fco!

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Alitalia A320 partial gear up in Fco!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Oct 2013, 06:19
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hadlow
Age: 60
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oaken runners? wouldn't a small (say 12"/300mm diameter) wheel do a better job? Would save a lot of dinged engines at a cost of a small increase in fuel consumption.
Super VC-10 is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2013, 11:34
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Now at Home
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I expect a major international airport to keep open when there is an accident on one runway and the other one is clear. If not, they should limit everyday operations to one runway only.
So do I. Fully agree.
Airbus_a321 is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2013, 12:25
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 495
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Are the 320s getting old?
The incident aircraft was built in mid-2010.
EI-EIB Alitalia Airbus A320-216 - cn 4249 - Planespotters.net Just Aviation

Last edited by Liffy 1M; 1st Oct 2013 at 12:28.
Liffy 1M is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2013, 13:33
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I recall, the LHR closure was down to both incidents (one on-runway and on off) requiring the emergency equipment, meaning there was insufficient emergency cover to operate the second runway safely.

ManaAda and A_321, would you feel the same way if it were you who had to make an emergency landing on the remaining runway with insufficient emergency equipment to cover it? Of course, if what you're saying is that LHR should expand its emergency coverage, then that'd make more sense.

Steering back on-topic, I don't think it's a case of the A320 fleet getting "old", it's just that these days there are so many of them that you will get the occasional day where several of them "go tech" for similar reasons!

Last edited by DozyWannabe; 1st Oct 2013 at 13:35.
DozyWannabe is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2013, 14:38
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ManaAdaSystem

Might I respectfully suggest you log on to CAP 168 and broaden your RFFS knowledge. The overall length / height of the B787 (and on fire) could have required 3 appliances which would substantially reduce the size / height of landing or departing aircraft. An unacceptable task for ATC Controllers I think.
robert f jones is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2013, 14:59
  #26 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are the 320s getting old?
We unfortunately all are ...
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2013, 17:09
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: South East England
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In flight video: Video: Italy plane crash seen from inside the aircraft - Telegraph
Eclectic is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.