AF 321 close to stall
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and the PNF shouting "Airspeed" when the trend or instant value wasn't going the right way) was a given.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: In one of the two main circles
Age: 65
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dubious translation
Well, well, well ... already 44 posts on a thread that has started with a very dubious translation of the BEA report by The Aviation Herald.
BEA :
Incident
20/07/2012 AD Paris Charles de Gaulle(95)
Passage sous la vitesse d'évolution en approche, déclenchement de la protection grande incidence
Vol AD Bordeaux Mérignac (33) - AD Paris Charles de Gaulle (95). Lors de l'approche, pilote automatique engagé et A/THR déconnectée, l'avion passe en dessous de la vitesse
d'évolution. Le pilote automatique se déconnecte à la suite de l'activation de la protection grande incidence ''ALPHA PROT". L'équipage reprend les commandes, réajuste la
poussée et atterrit normalement.
Incident
20/07/2012 AD Paris Charles de Gaulle(95)
Passage sous la vitesse d'évolution en approche, déclenchement de la protection grande incidence
Vol AD Bordeaux Mérignac (33) - AD Paris Charles de Gaulle (95). Lors de l'approche, pilote automatique engagé et A/THR déconnectée, l'avion passe en dessous de la vitesse
d'évolution. Le pilote automatique se déconnecte à la suite de l'activation de la protection grande incidence ''ALPHA PROT". L'équipage reprend les commandes, réajuste la
poussée et atterrit normalement.
The Aviation Herald :
Incident: Air France A321 at Paris on Jul 20th 2012, speed drops to alpha floor on approach
By Simon Hradecky, created Wednesday, Sep 12th 2012 16:34Z, last updated Wednesday, Sep 12th 2012 16:34Z
An Air France Airbus A321-200, registration F-GTAN performing flight AF-7633 from Bordeaux to Paris Charles de Gaulle (France), was on final approach to Charles de Gaulle's runway 26L with autopilot and autothrust engaged, when autothrust disconnected and the speed decayed until the alpha floor protection activated accelerating the engines to takeoff/goaround thrust and disengaging the autopilot. The crew took control, stabilized the aircraft and continued for a safe landing on runway 26L.
The BEA reported in their weekly bulletin of Sep 11th that the autothrust system had disengaged permitting the airspeed to decay to a point where the alpha floor protection activated, disengaged the autopilot and accelerated the engines. The crew took manual control and continued the landing. The BEA is investigating the serious incident.
So it appears that autothrottle was off "A/THR déconnectée" and has NOT "disengaged" on its own and that it is not considered as a "serious incident" by BEA but just as an incident.
Incident: Air France A321 at Paris on Jul 20th 2012, speed drops to alpha floor on approach
By Simon Hradecky, created Wednesday, Sep 12th 2012 16:34Z, last updated Wednesday, Sep 12th 2012 16:34Z
An Air France Airbus A321-200, registration F-GTAN performing flight AF-7633 from Bordeaux to Paris Charles de Gaulle (France), was on final approach to Charles de Gaulle's runway 26L with autopilot and autothrust engaged, when autothrust disconnected and the speed decayed until the alpha floor protection activated accelerating the engines to takeoff/goaround thrust and disengaging the autopilot. The crew took control, stabilized the aircraft and continued for a safe landing on runway 26L.
The BEA reported in their weekly bulletin of Sep 11th that the autothrust system had disengaged permitting the airspeed to decay to a point where the alpha floor protection activated, disengaged the autopilot and accelerated the engines. The crew took manual control and continued the landing. The BEA is investigating the serious incident.
Last edited by llagonne66; 13th Sep 2012 at 13:19. Reason: Missing a NOT that made the sentence incorrect
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So it appears that autothrottle was off "A/THR déconnectée" and has "disengaged" on its own and that it is not considered as a "serious incident" by BEA but just as an incident.
But a flight crew who allows the speed to drop almost to stall speed causes surely a "serious incident" IMHO.
BTW
AB calls it auto-thrust, not autothrottle.
Why on earth would the support pilot be "shouting"? One would have thought mandated support calls required normal talking style on the flight deck. One does not "shout" V1 or rotate, or 1000 to go and so on?
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SLF, living somewhere East in the West
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wasn't there also a plane near stalling right over Paris some years ago, don't remember if it was AF as well...
Last edited by grimmrad; 13th Sep 2012 at 18:24.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, but totally different scenario.
In both cases, like some others, a goaround was misshandled. A typical A300/310 issue (have been there, got the t-shirt).
But with AF7633 a flag carrier's crew allowed a speed decay of about 30kts during approach until the automatics slammed in.
In both cases, like some others, a goaround was misshandled. A typical A300/310 issue (have been there, got the t-shirt).
But with AF7633 a flag carrier's crew allowed a speed decay of about 30kts during approach until the automatics slammed in.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: In one of the two main circles
Age: 65
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Totally true, they let the speed decay and that needs to be explained.
And true, the automatisms saved the day by giving control of the A/C back to the pilotswho have then reacted correctly.
So maybe A. philosophy is not so bad after all
And true, the automatisms saved the day by giving control of the A/C back to the pilotswho have then reacted correctly.
So maybe A. philosophy is not so bad after all
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the automatisms saved the day by giving control of the A/C back to the pilots
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not trying to start Airbus V Boeing here ... but surely ... if the throttles moved (like a boeing) the crew would hold them until 80kts (or is it V1?) and would instantly recognise a power reduction
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: In one of the two main circles
Age: 65
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Guess it was some joint effort between the A/C and the crew !
As stated in the BEA report :
As stated in the BEA report :
Following activation of the ALPHA PROT, autopilot disconnected. The crew took control, reajusted thrust and landed normally.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@illa
I'm not saying the philosophy of the aircraft is wrong with regards to this serious event.
All I want to point out is, a flag carrier's crew goofed it up almost to stall.
Needless to say, in a flight phase where speed is an important issue.
I'm not saying the philosophy of the aircraft is wrong with regards to this serious event.
All I want to point out is, a flag carrier's crew goofed it up almost to stall.
Needless to say, in a flight phase where speed is an important issue.
Boeing/Airbus, Autothrottle/Auto thrust, Alpha floor, Rad Alt etc. etc. are all completely irrelevant.
Microburst has hit the nail on the head - WHO IS WATCHING THE SHOP?
If you are so unaware of what is happening, you are in the wrong job.
Microburst has hit the nail on the head - WHO IS WATCHING THE SHOP?
If you are so unaware of what is happening, you are in the wrong job.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am not against use of automation but I believe this is where the root cause of the problem is. I don't blame the individuals - it is the system (or lack of it) that has produced this result.
Agreed entirely that there should be more focus on training handflight - especially at altitude, but the fact is that if the industry intends to continue expanding then it's going to become practically impossible to practice handflight on the line.
...given the dumbing down of basic skills the software/techie guys will seek all sorts of solution with extra warning systems I suppose.
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Takeshima
Age: 55
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Remembered a stick and rudder hero at my previous outfit who decided to fly manually with A/P, A/T off. He flew down to level off at Circuit altitude; unfortunately he forgot he had disconnected the autothrust and totally forgot to manually add thrust. The airspeed dropped to near stall speed before the sleepy eye PM noticed the f**k up, slammed the throttles up and saved the day!
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: HK
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Crazy stunt pilot
The moving thrust levers did not save the Turkish crew flying into AMS so your argument is flawed, we pilots need to monitor the "SHIP".
It must have been an interesting recovery, although there was no mention of TOGA LOCK.
That's why I prefer autothrottles to autothrust. I can see the levers moving.
It must have been an interesting recovery, although there was no mention of TOGA LOCK.
Last edited by iceman50; 14th Sep 2012 at 02:49.
Having no idea of "airbus laws" can someone briefly explain this "alpha floor" logic that they have??
Out of interest re auto thrust/throttle if a speed significantly lower (initial approach limit down to Vref) than the aircrafts current speed is selected on an approach, will the auto thrust/throttle system automatically reduce power to idle to slow the aircraft?? Or will it be a 'powered deceleration', or am I way off the mark re how this system works??
Cheers.
Out of interest re auto thrust/throttle if a speed significantly lower (initial approach limit down to Vref) than the aircrafts current speed is selected on an approach, will the auto thrust/throttle system automatically reduce power to idle to slow the aircraft?? Or will it be a 'powered deceleration', or am I way off the mark re how this system works??
Cheers.
Last edited by noclue; 14th Sep 2012 at 06:19.