Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Passenger says she had "surgically implanted bomb"

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Passenger says she had "surgically implanted bomb"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th May 2012, 12:58
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
svhar - selecting A7500 would be safer, its the quiet ones that cause concern......
5milesbaby is offline  
Old 24th May 2012, 14:16
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,221
Received 408 Likes on 254 Posts
Evidently the system that the military has in such cases failed on the 9 11 and no one can guarantee that it will not fail again, given the same circumstances. The scenario was as straight forward as they get: comm contact with four jets was lost.
The decision matrix is not "comm contact lost, shoot jet."
You realize that, right?

For example, there was no cueing that a particular comms contact lost was out of the ordinary until the first jet hit a building. At that point, during a time in which the presumption of that tactic was not on the table, the timeline to get whatever alerts (and perhaps tankers?) were at hand up, and then within the vicinity of an unknown number of jets of interst (which of the hundreds in the air, and where are they?) across an entire continent does not lead to your posited FOUR opportunities.

Maybe 1, maybe 2, depending on how you reconstruct the time and space problems. As I suspect you are aware, while it is all going down, figuring out which flights are potential hazards takes time.

Last edited by Lonewolf_50; 24th May 2012 at 14:17.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 25th May 2012, 09:04
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 56
Posts: 1,445
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Exactly.

And the PR for a government - whether shooting down the 'right jet' filled with innocent hostages or the 'wrong' jet that was mis-identified as a threat is disastrous, possibly terminal and wonderful for the terrorists.

The idea that we would shoot down a civilian airliner, taken hostage or not is ridiculous and it should be stated with no reservation that we don't do it & any loss of lives from a terrorist act is only the responsibility of the terrorists & not our reaction to their act.
Load Toad is offline  
Old 25th May 2012, 20:38
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Germany
Age: 47
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Allegedly, a female passenger claimed to have an explosive device implanted inside her body
i only can imagine she exploded hard last night and was still under impression ?

the costs of this thing the airline will bill her for surely cool her down...
aerobat77 is offline  
Old 26th May 2012, 00:14
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Bermuda Triangle
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with Load Toad. The idea of shooting down a plane is totally absurd.

Then the terrorists have won big time. Hysteria everywhere. One wrong word uttered, hysteria. We have taken the course of action that they hoped for.

In my opinion, there are only two ways. Let them live their way or eliminate them. Teaching others a lesson does not work. Read some history books.
svhar is offline  
Old 26th May 2012, 21:25
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: East sussex
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To really bugger us up, is to add a little something to the Chinese/Indian take- aways on a Friday night. Army, Air force and Navy will be on the loo.

Sorted!!!!


Ps. I'm awaiting first reports of the tampon bomber Built in fuse, if you know what I mean

Last edited by dazdaz1; 26th May 2012 at 21:34.
dazdaz1 is offline  
Old 27th May 2012, 11:48
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the terrorists have won big time. Hysteria everywhere. One wrong word uttered, hysteria.
Absolutely correct although I wouldn't say everywhere. The Americans are the undisputed masters of hysterical OTT reactions. Seen it personally more than once. To be honest, the sheer hysterical reactions of some Americans frightens me more than the terrorists do!
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 28th May 2012, 21:41
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Found on another site:
It was later announced that she will not face any criminal charges, and was being refused entry to the US and would be returned to France.
That is yet another problem with so-called "security": When people make obvious threats, they are let off, often without even a hand-slap.

Last edited by Intruder; 28th May 2012 at 21:41.
Intruder is offline  
Old 29th May 2012, 07:52
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What was the "obvious" threat exactly INTRUDER? My interpretation is that something said innocently by a French national struggling with the English language was (wrongly) perceived to be a threat by an American crew.

For this, said person is now (rightly) released and yet (wrongly) refused entry into the USA. That tells you a lot about the hysteria and absurd logic which now prevails with the American authorities. The loonies are in charge of the asylum!

I work daily with a multitude of nationalities. Even though most have a reasonably good to fair command of the English language it is not unusual to find them sometimes lacking clarity when expressing themselves in non standard situations. American hysteria has programmed the public, airline crews, and officials to consider anything which they don't understand as a threat.
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 29th May 2012, 10:42
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Age: 78
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it not possable to have a helicopter hover above the plane and some SAS members climb onboard and cut a hole in the fuz and then go in and kill the baddies or to drain the fuels from the tanks etc limiting the range it could fly ???????

Last edited by pilot999; 29th May 2012 at 10:43.
pilot999 is offline  
Old 29th May 2012, 12:38
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: any town as retired.
Posts: 2,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pilot 999

now what was that movie called...
Gulfstreamaviator is offline  
Old 29th May 2012, 12:49
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Milano
Age: 53
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
now what was that movie called...glf
Airport 1975. Although in the movie they didn't have to cut any hole in the fuselage seeing as there was already a big gaping hole in the pointy end nor were there any "baddies" to kill.
Possibly one of the worst "disaster movies" ever made by man...

Last edited by Dg800; 29th May 2012 at 12:50.
Dg800 is offline  
Old 29th May 2012, 21:00
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What was the "obvious" threat exactly INTRUDER? My interpretation is that something said innocently by a French national struggling with the English language was (wrongly) perceived to be a threat by an American crew.
Presenting a prepared note of that type to the flight attendant is NOT typical of "innocently... struggling with the English language." It is more typical of, as others have pointed out, "probing" or other reconnaissance.

I tend to believe the threat was real, even if not immediate.
Intruder is offline  
Old 29th May 2012, 22:15
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas, like a whole other country
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
now what was that movie called...glf
There was a scenario not unlike that in "Executive Decision." Now that was a truly awful movie!

Last edited by Carbon Bootprint; 29th May 2012 at 22:16.
Carbon Bootprint is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.