Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Jet Airways "Supernumerary" Landed Jet--not reported

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Jet Airways "Supernumerary" Landed Jet--not reported

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Feb 2012, 07:39
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mumbai, INDIA
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whats so difficult...... JUST FOLLOW THE RULE.........
HAWK21M is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2012, 13:21
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Playing Golf!
Age: 46
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Following rules seems to be difficult in India....

Just look at they way they drive!
PT6A is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2012, 16:51
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: X-BOX
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

TOO MANY PEOPLE...... TOOOOO MUCH OF KNOWLEDGE...

Try sticking to the issue..... i.e. Capt giving landing to Supy!!!!
maverick320 is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2012, 18:14
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: cyprus
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Courage

Its a great leap when a F/O can stand up to a captain and report him. He should be punished for 'leaving' his seat, but on on the other hand, punished leniently. The capt on the other hand should be prosecuted for criminal negligence.

I heard of a similar situation yrs ago in my airline where one of our capt removed the F/O by verbal force and sat another company pilot (his friend) to do the landing. The 2nd pilot had experience on non-similar type (BAC1-11) and was soon to complete his conversion on the A320. The capt obviously felt above the law so to speak.

These captains have no place in modern airlines that like to follow good market safety procedures and good CRM principles.

A company that will 'tolerate' such cover ups has a time limit.
chris11 is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2012, 22:55
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try sticking to the issue..... i.e. Capt giving landing to Supy!!!!
That's not the issue at all. It has several times been pointed out, if you'd bothered to read the thread, that the supernumerary did NOT land the aircraft. If he took any physical part in the flight, it was that he farted into the right-seat cushion. Otherwise, he was an observer and rider.
stepwilk is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2012, 23:08
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Playing Golf!
Age: 46
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maverick320,

With a name like "Maverick" maybe that is why you don't get the issue!

It is about the company ethos that allowed this Captain to come to the conclusion that an airliner full of passengers was the correct place to let and untrained, unqualified person occupy a required crewmembers seat.

Further, ignored the protest from the First Officer (who requested to get back into his seat for the landing)

That is part one of the issue:-

The second part is why the company flight safety department broke the terms and conditions of the airlines AOC and went out of their way to hide the matter from the DGCA.....

Does this sound like a safe operator? A good company safety attitude? A just culture? An airline that embraces CRM?

NO! Sounds more like an airline that allows a "Maverick" attitude in their company and in their flightdecks.
PT6A is offline  
Old 23rd Feb 2012, 23:37
  #67 (permalink)  
fdr
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 3rd Rock, #29B
Posts: 2,956
Received 861 Likes on 257 Posts
Incredible...


Incredible....
India!

What else?
So do we assume that such aberrant behaviour by the Capt and passive (at least) submission to deviation by the FO is limited geographically? There are at least 3 well known events of European (ish) or Antibodean airlines having such events, an A310 crash, a B767 Capt getting a year as an FO... or a B737 with a passenger doing the takeoff resulting in a tailstrike. In these other events, not one party was from the sub continent...

Incredible.... disregard for rules, and contempt for professional standards of behaviour.
fdr is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2012, 08:23
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The reality is that much of the developing world have not really caught onto the idea of 'multi-crew co-operation'. Though they love breathing the magic letters C, R and M down your throat they have absolutely no idea what it means because quite simply an FO raising a concern, especially if Mr ex-mil Fast Jet jock is in the LHS, is considered disrespect. Until this is addressed (requires a major cultural change) we can expect more incidents like this.
Superpilot is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2012, 22:01
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I bucked one and Tim bucked two
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CRM.....Had a friend who was going through Line Instructor Pilot training at KAL who told me that during the course one of the korean instructors said to the class "CRM is for western airlines, does not work here". You don't know whether to laugh or cry. Thing is, the instructor was right, CRM doesn't work over there. They don't know what it is. Change the name of the airline. SSDD.
Keylime is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.