Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Airbus lands short at Palermo

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Airbus lands short at Palermo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Jun 2011, 09:38
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: london
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rumour has it that Windjet are planning to attach a poster under the co-pilots window saying "For 60,000 euros your son could be sitting here!"

It is a fitting monument to crap pay-to-fly companies everywhere.
saucy jack is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2011, 11:27
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SoCalif
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JATO

You know what? If a/c had JATO rockets, and an emergency system of activation (in windshear conditions at low altitude) - slow spool ups and low altitude windshears would be less of a worry.
You know what? All Mexicana 727 until the latest with JT8D-17R engines had four 1000 lb JATO bottles in the aft fuselage that could be deployed by the pilots. XMEX is at 7300 ft, and often hot, and lots of TS.

The JATO were deployed once by a copilot hitting the wrong button on approach. They said the noise was a lot more noticeable than the thrust.

The other time they used JATO was during the slide after a gear up landing doing pilot training in Acapulco at 3am. They only made things worse.

I believe they were the only airline to buy JATO.

GB
Graybeard is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2011, 15:24
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That aircraft will be a writeoff, right? Looks pretty bad.
ross_M is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2011, 15:29
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What can we do to make pax behave better during evacs? Each accident has horror stories of people trying to shove luggage with them. Makes me cringe. Fine people after evacs for taking bags? Central lock the overhead bins and announce pre-evac? Crappy ideas, I know. Any better ones?

PS. Is there a stereotype? i.e. are some routes (Germans?) more disciplined at evacs than others....
ross_M is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2011, 23:02
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: in the magical land of beer and chocolates
Age: 53
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
about sudden need for power.

The only way I could see for modern engines (high BPR, relatively large engine diameter) to have emergency power available within the blink of an eye would be with the aid of some sort of hydrazine backup system which could deliver such sudden powersurge almost instantly.

There would be issues however with the volatilety and toxicity of it being on board an airliner on a permanent base, maybe only enough for a 1 time kick in the pants option, and that's it.
kbrockman is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2011, 04:03
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, that is baggage being thrown out during the EVAC.....


Shore Guy is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2011, 04:33
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: YBBN
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@kbrockman

There was intended to be a hydrazine fuelled APU fitted to Concorde for use at airports that didn't have air start available. That idea was thrown out when one day a drop of hydrazine leaked and left a crater in the hangar floor.

I don't think that would be a good idea to fit hydrazine powered anything to RPT aircraft.....
yssy.ymel is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 06:36
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't hydrazine what they used as starter injections on the Blackbird? I think it was some ridiculously small amount; in mililitres i I am not mistaken.
ross_M is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 08:55
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Spain
Age: 82
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Evac with baggage

Before we could get out of the aircraft several passengers blocked the exits for quite a few minutes because they wouldn't leave their hand baggage behind.
I agree, ross M. Overhead bins should be locked. Just as well there was no fire.
Sunnyjohn is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 09:23
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: At home
Posts: 1,232
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
What can we do to make pax behave better during evacs? Each accident has horror stories of people trying to shove luggage with them. Makes me cringe. Fine people after evacs for taking bags? Central lock the overhead bins and announce pre-evac? Crappy ideas, I know. Any better ones?
Given that passengers (the people that keep airlines in business) pay to travel to their destination for a purpose, and that purpose might be a meeting of very significant worth to them or their company, is it any surprise they might want to retrieve their laptop or whatever?

An all-airline policy that hand baggage will be retrieved and returned at the very earliest opportunity, if announced in every safety briefing might go someway to reducing what goes down slides.

In the wake of the Heathrow Terminal 5 opening, in which we saw 'unidentified' baggage being sent to Italy and auctioned off, despite items inside which were clearly traceable to their owners, very few passengers believe that the safety and security of their baggage is of as much concern to airlines and airport operators as it is to themselves.
Mechta is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 09:25
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Age: 73
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Inability of turbine engines to respond to urgent power demands

This leads me to question the inability of turbine engines to respond to urgent power demands. Some are better than others but they all take too long to spool up in this kind of situation.
ANCIENT GREEK: A modern turbine goes from flight idle to full power in close to one second. No piston engine does much better!

The problem is they have no propellers to speed the airflow over the wings. You have to wait for the whole aircraft to increase speed before you get any more lift.

Of course, you could always land at full noise like they do on the aircraft carriers... Imagine the whiplash claims down the back when they hit the arrester wires :-)

Tell you what: Let's mandate "longer, wider runways" for RPT, and "Navaids down = airport closed". Simple, low-tech, proven solutions.

Wouldn't work so well at my home airport: SYD is owned by an investment bank: they would only spend money if it created an opportunity to install more shops...
JohnMcGhie is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 09:30
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: guess where...
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2 days ago (9 june 2011), I've landed in Palermo and I saw the A320 still standing next to the runway. Completely painted white.
This seemed a bit odd to me... is it usual to paint them so that the other passengers can not see which company it belongs to?

I mean, I know it is obviously very bad publicity, but hey, if you want to avoid it, then don't crash and if you do, then face the consecuences (bad publicity should be the least of your worries IMHO)

Daermon ATC is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 12:28
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A modern turbine goes from flight idle to full power in close to one second. No piston engine does much better!
I am confused. Didn't people mention 4-7 seconds needed to spool up? Is that different from Idle to Full Power?

Overhead bins should be locked. Just as well there was no fire.
I've never been through an evac as a PAX but does the CC even mention this in a pre-evac briefing? Maybe there need to be more reminders about "Leave bags behind"

Perhaps PAX are doing this impulsively and if reminded of the hazard would refrain?
ross_M is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 12:43
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It's always amusing to read technical redesign suggestions in threads like this, but flat out incorrect factual statements like below need to be contested.

ANCIENT GREEK: A modern turbine goes from flight idle to full power in close to one second.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 13:07
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stockport MAN/EGCC
Age: 70
Posts: 991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I've never been through an evac as a PAX but does the CC even mention this in a pre-evac briefing? Maybe there need to be more reminders about "Leave bags behind"

Perhaps PAX are doing this impulsively and if reminded of the hazard would refrain?
In my experience as reasonable high time S.L.F. Most pax ignore safety announcements especially the pre recorded ones. My last flight a quick look round showed approx 10-15% actually looking at the screens. So not a lot of hope there.
Be lucky
David
The AvgasDinosaur is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 13:34
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In my experience as reasonable high time S.L.F. Most pax ignore safety announcements especially the pre recorded ones. My last flight a quick look round showed approx 10-15% actually looking at the screens. So not a lot of hope there.
Of course. I didn't mean the pre-recorded routines. I meant during whatever time (if) you have between an evac ordered and the actual evac start.

On a lighter note, PAX sure are surprisingly rational sometimes: On the Hudson river ditching incident I don't remember too many bags on the wings. Maybe PAX decided their bags would be safer in the dry cabins than out in the Hudson.
ross_M is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 15:58
  #57 (permalink)  

Dir. PPRuNe Line Service
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Southern England
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
ANCIENT GREEK: A modern turbine goes from flight idle to full power in close to one second. No piston engine does much better!
Wrong. It takes an RB211 Trent 900 series engine 5.6 seconds to spool up from flight idle (15% thrust) to takeoff power (95% thrust). Source: European Aviation Safety Agency Type-certificate data sheet.

PPD
PPRuNe Dispatcher is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 16:34
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is it usual to paint them so that the other passengers can not see which company it belongs to?
Been done for ages. At the very least, an airline will quickly paint over its logos.
stepwilk is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2011, 03:46
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Here, there, and everywhere
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
I guess there was a bit of a leak of info.


"17/11/2010

September 24th air accident in Palermo: disclosure of CVR (Cockpit Voice Recorder) contents – the ANSV (Agenzia nazionale per la sicurezza del volo, Italian flight safety agency) position


Referring to the information reported by the press, relative to the partial contents of the CVR of the A319, registration marks EI-EDM, involved in the accident occurred in Palermo on September 24th, ANSV – with no intent to comment on the reliability of the information, as its investigation is still undergoing – remarks nevertheless that the disclosure of CVR contents contravenes international regulations provisions on the matter (Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, relative to safety investigations). ANSV therefore, as in similar previous circumstances, reserves to take all initiatives in order to protect the content of CVRs, which shall be used with the sole objective of prevention within the limits indicated in the above mentioned Annex 13"
punkalouver is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2011, 10:25
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Where I am told
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am not sure that the spool up time from idle to 100%N1 is relevent. Final approach N1 is about 57%. How long does it take to firewall from here? Fairly quick I would suggest. At some stage someone has got to command additional thrust sources. That takes time during a period of high activity.
Gentle Climb is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.