Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Jet and Turkish Airlines 777 in 'near-miss' over London

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Jet and Turkish Airlines 777 in 'near-miss' over London

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Sep 2010, 17:19
  #21 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yet we have having a bash at the Turkish pilot who was doing what he was suppose to.
- the comments have been that THY did not follow the initial RA.
BOAC is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2010, 17:23
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The sky
Posts: 337
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
In fact the Turkish jet failed to respond to three RA's. The Citation didn't have TCAS so it was up to the Turkish to do the avoiding. Yes it was the final error in a list, but it's a biggie.

They lost a jet because the autothrottle failed, now they're not responding to RA's. Not impressive.

LD
Locked door is online now  
Old 13th Sep 2010, 17:34
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lots of holes in the Swiss cheese here methinks - a lucky escape for all. But one would expect professionals to respond to an RA.
fireflybob is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2010, 17:38
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A lot of criticisms here (as usual ) rather than saying "what can we learn" and "what can I now do to ensure this wouldn't happen to me"? For me:

The crew requested clearance to start engines from the Tower controller but were given both start and ATC clearances in the reply.
We, and am sure other airlines, have strict rules about both pilots listening to, writing down, and checking the clearance. Some SOPs might get cut short, not this one by choice i.e. I doubt a P2 in my airlione would go and get the ATC Clnc when I was not aware. However, frequently one call to ATC and it is just given, unrequested, as here... So maybe one for ATCOs to think on?

faced a rapidly changing TCAS encounter with two RAs generated within six seconds and three in less than 10 seconds
Whilst technically the crew did not follow the procedures here, it was a tough call IMHO. Training Flight, P2 handling, already half configured for landing, turning onto base, busy comms both ATC and in cockpit, and then 3 RAs, 2 trying to get a descent at low level. Can you really say a less than 100% correct response is "poor"? I reckon, not pre-warned / not in the Sim, a good % of crews would not have got it much more right Particularly when it was a trainee as PF who maybe missed the initial RA, and the Capt had to take control to respond.

I remember doing a few Sims when I knew TCAS RAs were coming, and response from crews needing repeating. I don't remember any with 3 RAs in rapid succession, in the middle of RT calls and the intermediate approach.

Again, those who are firing criticism at the THY crew, maybe actually read the report
His transmission and the subsequent reply from ATC were made at the same time as the first two RAs, which might have made the warnings more difficult to hear than otherwise
Lesson to me seems TCAS is a great system, but it is still one part only of avoiding mid-airs. It did not resolve this airmiss for various reasons, and I think if replicated in future, the response could not be expected to be much better. So the more traditional means of avoiding midairs - clearances, RoC etc. still need careful adherence The number of P2s I fly with who disregard the RoC rule, and when challenged, point at the TCAS display and say "but there's nobody out there" (which starts another topic)

NoD
NigelOnDraft is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2010, 18:03
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How does TCAS tackle the terrain?

If turkish was to follow the TCAS, started a steep descent, at the same time the other plane followed the ATC and descended back to 3000. As the turkish would already be in a descent would TCAS push him further down?

How for would this game continue and how far would a pilot follow TCAS descent with terrain?

What are the rules with ATC, non-TCAS aircraft and TCAS equipped aircraft that close to terrain?
LayLoLay is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2010, 18:15
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LayToLay

TCAS RAs in general are inhibited below ~1000R (the actual ruleset is quite complex), and become TAs.

Our QRH says to "respect GWPS warnings" during a TCAS RA, which to me seems sensible

That said, ~4000' over London in a widebody jet, low speed, half configured, I think it would be hard work to make oneself stuff the nose down to >2500'/m, almost certainly (but correctly) overspeeding the flaps in the process which will now set off various loud bells to add to the TCAS / ATC / Crew Comms / maybe GPWS symphony

NoD
NigelOnDraft is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2010, 07:33
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: schermoney and left front seat
Age: 57
Posts: 2,438
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmm, as a german business jet pilot that visits LCY regularly, I´ve got to say I find it hard NOT to query the clearance to 4000ft - when you go upstairs to pay your fees and/or use the crewlounge, there is plenty of "avoid levelbusts" / "remember the stepped clib" / etc posters on the walls. Also LCY JetCentre sends out good info on the subject to all users.

Sometimes the handover to Thames is quite late and so the "gate" of the initial call with cleared level might not work always. If we go outta there, it usually comes together with level off and first turn...

Someone asked why some of us climb so hard when in LCY...most likely because we have been told of numerous noise monitoring stations. Thats what I try to avoid, getting a prob with these things (and adhere to climb gradient requirements of course)
His dudeness is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2010, 19:27
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: suburbia
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
interim report

here is the official interim report

http://www.aaib.gov.uk/cms_resources...JA%2009-10.pdf
alpergokgoz is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2010, 14:49
  #29 (permalink)  
Too mean to buy a long personal title
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,968
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by stepwilk
Ultimately, my gripe is having to wade through so much trash from simplayers and the people who at best ride in "passenger planes." There are plenty of enthusiast sites out there, and that's not what I come here for.
The phrase "passenger plane" was used by the BBC journalist who wrote the article quoted in the OP, so I think your gripe may be misplaced.
Originally Posted by alpergokgoz
here is the official interim report
I think that's the final report, already linked to in post #4.
Globaliser is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.