Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Falsified CV's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Sep 2010, 19:11
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 45 yards from a tropical beach
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
250 hour pilots have been foisted on our profession by beancounters; the very same beancounters who have contrived to diminish the authority of the Captain.

Consider this - the 250 hour PTF pilot will not become a 1,000 hour pilot. Once he or she has achieved the extra 100 hours, or whatever they have paid for, they will be replaced by yet another 250 hour wonder.

What amazes me is that actuaries, myopically slaving over their ledgers, have not alerted their Insurance Company masters to the inevitable risk in this parsimonious venture.
Neptunus Rex is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2010, 19:31
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would venture to say that far more low time pilots are hired as just that, low time pilots, than individual who have bought their way.

After all, everybody started somewhere.

While I'm not fond of shoe-horning into a miniature CRJ behind two young men who aren't yet old enough to shave, I also recognize that the pay structure won't put an 8,000 hour ATP in the right seat, either. I couldn't personally afford to go to work for a regional airline at the wages they pay, and the position has been an entry level job for some time now.

In the US, the recent regulatory address (still in the works) at raising the minimum hour experience level to 1,500, with an ATP, is a wave at addressing the problem, but nothing more than that. Abroad, inexperineced pilots are common in professional cockpits.

One can't say that the 200 hour mark, or 500 hour mark, or whatever is a magic panacea, nor can one say that a 250 hour pilot is incapable. 250 hour pilots, after all, complete Undergraduate Pilot Training and then go out to fight a war. It's the 250 hour pilots who sell a resume with 1,500 hours on it and experience they don't have, that are the problem.

That problem, and the blame thereof, should be laid squarely on the shoulders of the individuals brazen enough to falsify their own resume.
SNS3Guppy is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2010, 19:43
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NW
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guppy I will have to respectfully disagree..

Why did Bernie Madoff get away with his ponzi scheme as long as he did - Because the SEC was asleep at the wheel.

Why did the banks fail? - Because regulators were asleep at the wheel

What would people do if cops didn't give tickets? Drivers would run wild

What keeps baseball players from taking steriods? congressional hearings.

Who hires the 200 hour wonders, and people with grossly exaggerated resumes? The chief pilots..

There will always be someone out there trying to break the rules and either the gatekeepers do their jobs or they don't.

Just remember this thing got so stupid and so out of hand that congress had to step in because so many operators weren't doing their jobs..
johns7022 is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2010, 20:26
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: Formerly of Nam
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Falsifying a log book and resume with Parker Pen time has
always been around for as long as I can remember.

I recall a TAA candidate in my day who falsified he had 2000
hours Baron (his only twin time) when it came out he actualy
had only 800 hours on type - 1200 was Parker Pen. He was
instantley dropped from the F27 school that afternoon.
Slasher is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2010, 21:03
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Hotel
Age: 43
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a former chief pilot of a university flight school that I taught at, claimed significant experience in all types including the L1011...
We all became suspicious of him when we noticed basics just didnt add up..
His stories (which he was quick to tell) where full of holes.
having done a little research and unfortunately having flown with the individual led me to believe he was just your basic weekend warrior...

a couple of friends and I did a basic search of his ratings on the online database only to find.......nothing.

the individual was later fired..then hired again in a different school only to be fired again...

the world will never run out of impostors
Trentino is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2010, 22:41
  #46 (permalink)  
gtf
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Here today, elsewhere tomorrow
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chinese pilots who had lied about their flying experience have been allowed to return to work after they took remedial action to make up their hours.
What remedial action can the pilots take in such a relatively short time-span? Attend a course on how to make better forgeries?

Sounds like their harsh punishment is a clear disincentive for anyone else who might consider improving upon their CV in China... not.
gtf is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2010, 03:19
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't forget the pilot recently prosecuted for flying for years without a valid license. Goes way beyond falsifying time...

If that goes undetected for so long, what hope detecting a few added hours?

If memory serves, he was caught during a ramp inspection.

ECAM Actions.
ECAM_Actions is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2010, 05:56
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who hires the 200 hour wonders, and people with grossly exaggerated resumes? The chief pilots..

There will always be someone out there trying to break the rules and either the gatekeepers do their jobs or they don't.
Perhaps you've worked for some very bad companies. I've never met a chief pilot who knowingly selected a pilot who had falsified his time, or who sought out the lowest common denominator. Perhaps that's common in the circles you frequent. It's certainly not the case at professional operations.

When I have been in a hiring or evaluation capacity and come across such individuals personally, individuals with inaccurate records or falsified claims, I've taken pains to see them exposed. Or dismissed. I don't know anyone who would do differently.

Just remember this thing got so stupid and so out of hand that congress had to step in because so many operators weren't doing their jobs..
If you're referring to the impending NPRM, due tomorrow, or the legislation that's grinding it's way slowly through the bowels of congress, you should perhaps do a little fact checking and learn more about the source of these actions. It had nothing to do with people "falsifying their resumes."
SNS3Guppy is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2010, 09:35
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Age: 73
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This was two years ago!

What remedial action can the pilots take in such a relatively short time-span? Attend a course on how to make better forgeries?

Sounds like their harsh punishment is a clear disincentive for anyone else who might consider improving upon their CV in China... not.
If you read the original in the China Daily, you will see that these pilots were detected in 2008. So I guess they have had two or three years to ensure that their log books match their experience.

The interesting thing is that, in the China Daily, this report of finding a large number of P51 pilots two years ago was tacked on to their report of the Henan crash, one or two days after the incident. Almost as though the authorities already had a fair idea where the problem lay.
JohnMcGhie is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2010, 09:57
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: France
Age: 63
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At my non-aviation place of work, I have recently become closer to our hiring process, and I'm shocked at what I'm discovering. We have a couple of director-level people making $200K/year who have essentially fictitious CVs. But because we are too nice, they get through.

One of these people lasted 5 years; in effect, they defrauded us of a million bucks. If someone had placed a purchase order for one-twentieth of that amount with a company which turned out to be a total scam outfit which took our money and ran, our various audit bodies would be all over it. But when the money is coming from the salary budget, it's not scrutinised nearly as closely. I suspect that this may be a problem in many larger organisations.
sTeamTraen is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2010, 10:07
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Auckland, NZ
Age: 79
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not to mention the now-former New Zealand Chief Defence Scientist, who had, apparently, a very imaginative CV. If it had been on the other side of the Tasman, we could call it Walting Matilda.

And he was security vetted at the highest level.

Head scientist quits over CV claims - National - NZ Herald News
FlightlessParrot is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2010, 12:45
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and place young, extremely inexperienced pilots alongside very experienced pilots and put them to work.
Forgive my naivety, but surely passengers have the right to expect two highly experienced pilots up front. If only the media had the inside knowledge to expose the current set up in many airlines when the crew consists only of a man and his apprentice up front. And if the man becomes incapacitated heaven help the passengers because no one else can.
Tee Emm is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2010, 13:22
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edinburgh and 3C
Age: 72
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tee Emm: just how are the pilots supposed to gain the experience you would like them to have?
MagnusP is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2010, 14:14
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florianopolis
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its cetainly not only a chinese problem. Here in Brazil we use to have the "garimpo" pilots flying to the gold mines in the Amazon with no licence or training whatsoever until 10 years ago, maybe still some alive and flying... We had the VASP copilots who logged whatever they seemed fit on the later days of the company, with some absurd loggs of several thousand hours a year when actually flying 20-30 hrs a month. We have the EJ flight school, a recruitment "must" for copilots at gol and for some extent tam, where you payed a 30-40k for some 10-12 hours seneca/jet trainer and your log book boosted from some few hundred hours to around 1500 hours miraculously and maybe just a coincidense the time required to get into the companies! But worst of all is that regulators, DAC and Later ANAC, knew about it but covered it to avoid another scandal and an obvious pilot shortage as Brazil still dont allow foreigners to fly here.
Even legally, is it fair for someone who flew international, with a crew of 4 longhaul, stay half the time sleeping in the crewrest to log the hours full compared to a regional pilot who did 10-15 legs to get the same amount?
Who's to blame?
I think its a whole package:
-lack of control.
-lack of character of those who do it.
-cost pressure on companies which used to come up for training.
-pressure from insurance companies.
-lack of transparency.
-outdated criteria.
-company hopping ( in how may airlines in the world you do a complete career this days?)
-sloppy recruitment (sm times no sim, ineffective time waste with psych...)
and so on!
TOFFAIR is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2010, 14:48
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ... on an island!
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Time machine

Do the best to avoid to log more then 24 hours a day! Cause you are either flying on a time machine (awesome and I would like a TR on that machine too!), or you need to go back to math 101.
That's why CAAC inspectors found hard to believe!
169west is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2010, 14:59
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Forgive my naivety, but surely passengers have the right to expect two highly experienced pilots up front.
I begin to seriously doubt that you have any knowledge of the world of professional aviation at all. If you allways want two highly experienced guys upfront you can never ever hire someone without any experience on type or even god forbid out of your own cadet scheme. You the right to expect one experienced pilot up front and one with some experience sufficient to start learning in the right hand seat up to over 10k hours if you're lucky. But its a range, and it has to have a low point, which is currently at 50 to 80 hours real airplane experience for major carriers.
Denti is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2010, 15:04
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mars
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
experience

There was a time that airlines used the Second Officer idea to gain experience...watch and learn but than this too went to the beancounters. At the airline I am with now 250hr pilots come and fly 3 flights with a safety F/O and then 20 flights with an instructor. Needless to say the instructors are a little bit worn out. Now by the time the PİLOT has 300hrs they are released to the line if all goes well. Yipee I get to supervise kindergarten graduate after that for the next year or so. Asked an F/O about winter ops and the reply was : what does snow look like ? But hey they PAİD 250,000 euros to be here !
unb5 is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2010, 03:41
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: Formerly of Nam
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
unb5 you and me both bud, you and me both.
Slasher is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2010, 15:06
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South of N90º00'.0
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've come across 2 pilot logbooks that claimed 35,000 hours +. Both were from light twin/aerial work guys.

What's the chance they're genuine?
Assume that 25% of their career they were employed full time and flew maximum 1000 hours per year. (8750 Hours / 1000 = 8.75 Years

10% of their careers they were unemployed. (Career starts at 21. Retire at 60 = 3.9 years unemployed)

The other 50% of the time they had pretty normal jobs and flew about 700 hours per year. (17500 hours / 700 = 25 years


Split the difference on the other 15% of the career at 8750 hours / 850 per year = 10.9 years

Total = 69.55 years old


Assuming these folks began flying quite early - 21 years old - then it's pretty quick to see that they are way past retirement so you need not worry about it.


The dirty math is even simpler.

20 year old guy manages to fly 1000 per year for 35 years straight. He's 55 years old and, without a doubt, fatigued!
PappyJ is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2010, 15:32
  #60 (permalink)  
Trash du Blanc
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: KBHM
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I once interviewed for a job flying a King Aire.

Competing against me was a 30-year-old full-time helicopter pilot who had picked up all his fixed-wing time by working free-lance on his off days.

He claimed 4000 hours of King Aire time. Worked out to about 40 hours a month of block time, all on his off days, every month since college.

He got the job.
Huck is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.