Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Lufthansa cargo plane crash

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Lufthansa cargo plane crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd March 2012 | 01:57
  #401 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,166
Likes: 86
From: Planet Earth
''Aircraft with a centerline Bogie wear a familiar telltale of "Heavy Landing Prep"



Er, what ??



Lyman, you don't appear to make any sense
stilton is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd March 2012 | 04:33
  #402 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: middle of nowhere
But as long as you´re aware of this and remember basic flying it is not a difficult aircraft to fly.
Nicely put and so true. It points at the originating problem: Basic flying skills.

Y'alls continue diverting discussions about video analysis, short coupling, landing gear design and other of your non flying hobbies ......... and you just keep on proving our point.
Gretchenfrage is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd March 2012 | 08:52
  #403 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
From: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
A hard landing happens in lots of different types of aircraft, it's just the wing root failure/rollover that seems to be unique on the MD, 4 instances that I'm aware of....
ironbutt57 is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd March 2012 | 13:13
  #404 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Around the World
Loved flying the MD-11. I always found that with its LSAS, small, gentle inputs worked best on a approach. Similar to a FBW aircraft. It is airplane with a relatively high VREF and therefor initiating the flare at the correct height is vital, but I honestly don't think it has bad handling habits. Heck, I preferred the MD-11 in a crosswind compared to the Airbus I am flying now.

Automation and Flight Guidance was better in the MD-11, too, but that is another story.
Burger Thing is offline  
Reply
Old 7th March 2012 | 18:41
  #405 (permalink)  
SCIOLIST (look it up) of the first order
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Farnborough
Hard landing! Again.. crew did the wrong thing. The MD11 does sound a little tricky to land safely?
WASPERNATOR is offline  
Reply
Old 8th March 2012 | 14:06
  #406 (permalink)  

DOVE
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: Myself
Excellent WASPERNATOR
Excuse me but I don’t understand precisely what You’re saying.
Do you mean that there has been another MD11 hard landing in the recent days?
If yes, can you please let us know where, how, when, why and under what circumstances it happened?
DOVES is offline  
Reply
Old 9th March 2012 | 04:20
  #407 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
From: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Well, it didnt result in an accident, but I did observe a rather "firm" one recently in Dubai, followed by a cocked nosewheel on de-rotation which resulted in a large amount of smoke, and a tense moment or two for me, as I was approaching M13A and the nosewheel was pointing at me as it travelled past at a good clip, fortunately the aircraft didnt follow....
ironbutt57 is offline  
Reply
Old 9th March 2012 | 09:15
  #408 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 984
Likes: 51
From: EGSS
Don't mean to be rude but don't other types have "firm ones" now and again?? Normally as a result of seat-to-airplane interface?
Flightmech is offline  
Reply
Old 9th March 2012 | 09:54
  #409 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
From: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
As I've mentioned previously yes,(might have even committed one me-self) just not every day you see the "nosewheel dance", and most certainly not the wing failing, fortunately this time is wasnt that "firm"....the airplane appears to be a bit "unconventional" in its handling characteristics...as passed on to me by several former colleagues who fly it...
ironbutt57 is offline  
Reply
Old 9th March 2012 | 14:58
  #410 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 279
Likes: 17
From: Europe
Originally Posted by ironbutt57
Well, it didnt result in an accident, but I did observe a rather "firm" one recently in Dubai, followed by a cocked nosewheel on de-rotation which resulted in a large amount of smoke...
Be careful to judge a landing on the MD11 just by the amount of smoke you see generated on wheel spinup:

Several times I heard comments from other aircraft about our landings because of the amount of smoke, while the landing was absolutely normal and not firm whilst sitting at the controls on the flightdeck.

As for the nosewheel... hard to tell what happened there.

Cheers,
DBate
DBate is offline  
Reply
Old 10th March 2012 | 03:33
  #411 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
From: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
No need to judge by the smoke, seen plenty of MD landings, and other types as well
ironbutt57 is offline  
Reply
Old 10th March 2012 | 07:50
  #412 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Wood's Hole (N4131.0 W07041.5)
Y'all Gotta Know How to Fly

Couldn't agree with you more for those who have commented on basic flying skills required to land the MD.

For those who haven't flown it, well, there are those who have, and there are those who have yet to.

Further, Burger Things comments are very apt - in a savage Xwind, I prefer the MD to le Bus. Same goes for its FMS.

Keep the blue side up.
Weapons_Hot is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.