Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Near-miss as Saudia plane deviates from its flight path

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Near-miss as Saudia plane deviates from its flight path

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Nov 2009, 05:46
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Near-miss as Saudia plane deviates from its flight path

I love the comment from the Saudi Captain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Near-miss as Saudia plane deviates from its flight path - dnaindia.com
c46r is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 06:07
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tween Hurn&Filton
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those moving pax!

Loved it! The Saudia Cap'n didn't specify how many pax disturbed the trim on his 747, causing him to "have" to climb 200', but my guess is that 2 of them were queuing for the "bathroom" at the SAME time!
Paradise Lost is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 07:33
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A 200 ft is not even a reportable deviation. I don't know the exact envelope of the TCAS system, but I doubt if 800 ft separation will trigger a RA.

Sounds strange to me.
ManaAdaSystem is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 07:38
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: beyond PNR .. as always
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
level busted for sure ! but in Euro Control is 300FT , right ?
arba is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 07:47
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: EU
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
pax movement yeah right
ron83 is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 08:22
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Land of the Oryx
Age: 70
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A 200 ft is not even a reportable deviation. I don't know the exact envelope of the TCAS system, but I doubt if 800 ft separation will trigger a RA.

Sounds strange to me.
Ahh, but as we all know, RATE of closure could also trigger a RA.

Methinks there is more to the story than is being reported. Hmmm!
Captain Oryx is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 08:23
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Too many Djinns in the 747.
hetfield is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 08:33
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alloway
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perrin

I flew as flight mechanic with Saudia in the 80's. Thats the reason I have white hair now!!!!!! I remember the many flights but the ones into Sanna were exciting to say the least. Oh the greed of money it makes you do some silly things.
Keep them up boys
Perrin is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 08:51
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bloody Europeans, you just cant trust them to do anything!

Mutt
mutt is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 08:54
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North Wales
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SV 801 was being operated by Air Atlanta.......all Dhaka flts for Saudia are operated by AAI using B747-300s
Nippon1 is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 09:12
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: bahrain
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
passenger movement yea right! whats next? too many fat a pax in the airplane
Skybeds is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 13:36
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sin City
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This must be in the nomination for "The best excuse of the year award."
Here's another if the authorities don't buy that:
Could have been two fat pax taking a big dump at the aft lavatory at the same time.
leewan is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 14:01
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: not a million miles from old BKK
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Prayertime?
Xeque is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 14:01
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
being engaged on your laptops is still my favorite excuse
413X3 is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 15:20
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Herts
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel Saudi Capt. Explanation.

As the Irish say I think this Capt. is "AWAY WITH THE FAIRIES" to give this as an explanation is quite one for the books "RIPLEYS".
KENNEDY TOWER is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 15:49
  #16 (permalink)  

Pilots' Pal
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: USA
Age: 63
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While probably not the issue in this occurrence, I can recall an accident in which passenger movement may have caused - or was suspected causal in the chain to the crash - the aircraft to crash; Indian Airlines lost a Caravelle in about 1976 at Mumbai. Engine fire just after take-off; understandable panic in cabin and it is thought many passengers rushed forward as the aircraft approached after turnback; nosed in on the airport. All sadly lost.
Bus429 is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 15:58
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: It wasn't me, I wasn't there, wrong country ;-)
Age: 79
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just the "Fish Heads" again
merlinxx is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 16:05
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: earth
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have never met a Saudi pilot who would admit to making a mistake. It was always 'Allah's will' or a westerner who did it.
soddim is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 16:10
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A 200 ft is not even a reportable deviation.
Our FHB says max 200' altimeter error is allowed in RVSM airspace. However, Appendix G to FAR Part 91 also says a report must be made of any altitude-keeping error or altitude deviation of 300' or more...
Intruder is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2009, 16:23
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: London, Berlin, Bucharest
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
in the cruise i would expect the autopilot is on and the crew would not be hand flying it.

if there is a mistake, they have set the autopilot wrong in the first place or someone has VERY fat fingers and turned the knob by mistake.

centre of gravity....
Nashers is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.