Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

A320 hydraulic problem at DEN

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

A320 hydraulic problem at DEN

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Oct 2009, 18:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Expatsylvania
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A320 hydraulic problem at DEN

Plane landing at DIA towed to gate - The Denver Post

In short, the report says that UA418 landed safely on 34L at DEN with a total hydraulic failure. As in NO control surfaces.

Has anyone here heard anything about this? The story has received virtually no attention, suggesting either the media is incorrect either about the extent to which the airplane was crippled, or simply has no idea what a "total hydraulic failure" generally means for the folks trying to fly the airplane.

As I understand it, an A320 that's lost all three hydraulic systems has no control whatsoever other than differential thrust, ala UA232. "Mechanical Backup", the mode to which the plane reverts in the event of a complete electrical failure, simply allows for the manual adjustment of the hydraulic valve of one of the trim tabs.

*Update: Just heard from a family friend with the FAA - so far, the official line from them is "Landed with total hydraulic failure."
thepotato232 is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2009, 18:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Total Hyd Failure on 320?

Most probably you are dead.
hetfield is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2009, 18:55
  #3 (permalink)  
PJ2
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: BC
Age: 76
Posts: 2,484
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Denver Post story is just another example of why the media these days has so little credibility and is emminently worth ignoring.

No nosewheel steering likely means a green system failure; two other systems remain, the blue and yellow. I've had such a failure on a 330 and it actually taxis and turns quite well using a bit of differential braking to caster the nosewheel, at least to get the aircraft off the active.
PJ2 is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2009, 18:56
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: in the magical land of beer and chocolates
Age: 53
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Total Hydraulic failure sounds pretty bad.
Not rated on the Airbus but I was lead to believe that with no hydraulics whatsoever you still have differential thrust and pitch control through trimwheel?

Should atleast give some control.


Somebody with experience care to comment?
kbrockman is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2009, 18:56
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Expatsylvania
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, total hydraulic failure on anything and you're probably dead. This whole thing sounds so unlikely, so I was hoping an entity within the great PPRUNE hivemind had some information closer to the source.

A friend of mine is a 320 instructor, so I'm familiar with the hydraulic systems and reversion logic on the 'bus. The Post isn't the only news outlet saying "total" failure, which is why I'm curious.
thepotato232 is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2009, 18:56
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most likely just lost steering with a Green system failure.
AKAAB is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2009, 19:00
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you still have differential thrust and pitch control through trimwheel?
No pitch ctl via trimwheel!

Well, total hydraulic failure on anything and you're probably dead.
What about manual reversion on 737/727?
hetfield is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2009, 19:02
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: in the magical land of beer and chocolates
Age: 53
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thx hetfield,

Just found out myself that with only mechanical backup you still need hydraulics
kbrockman is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2009, 19:23
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Expatsylvania
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correction: Total hydraulic failure on anything with no control cables and you're probably dead. UA232 pulled off a crash landing with about a 2 out of 3 survival rate, and a DHL crew managed to land an older Airbus in Iraq after it lost all hydraulics, but it's still not a good place to be.
thepotato232 is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2009, 19:30
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, I'm not sure these DHL guys would like to do that stunt again....
hetfield is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2009, 19:36
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Up north
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Had an examiner that once asked me on the sim briefing - What happens if you loose all HYD? I answered something along the lines "We're f$#%&d". He said "That's right, you bend over and kiss your own a@@ goodbye!".

CP
CaptainProp is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2009, 19:46
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Where its at
Age: 40
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Evergreen aviation consultant Mike Boyd called the incident serious. "It was an emergency, no question," said Boyd.

But he said the Airbus A320 is such an advanced aircraft and United pilots so well trained that the passengers were never in danger.
Is this a total hydraulic failure or is there something we dont know about the circumstances? If it was a total triple hydraulic failure then the above quote is almost criminal in how it plays down the skills of the pilots involved.
Anansis is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2009, 19:53
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ORD
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As posted in the Aviation Herald

Incident: United Airlines A320 near Denver on Oct 21st 2009, hydraulics failure

By Simon Hradecky, created Thursday, Oct 22nd 2009 06:50Z, last updated Thursday, Oct 22nd 2009 06:50Z
A United Airlines Airbus A320-200, registration N497UA performing flight UA-418 from San Diego,CA to Denver,CO (USA), was on approach to Denver International Airport, when the crew reported the failure of one of the three hydraulics systems on board indicating, they'd need to be towed off the runway after landing. Emergency services assumed their stand by positions for the arrival. The airplane landed safely on runway 34L and was towed off the runway.

FlightAware > United Air Lines Inc. #418 > 21-Oct-2009 > KSAN-KDEN
pjd_012 is offline  
Old 22nd Oct 2009, 20:03
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Expatsylvania
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mike Boyd is a God-damned idiot. He has shown on every available occasion a complete lack of knowledge of aircraft systems, to say nothing of his lack of knowledge in many other aviation-related fields. He remains the go-to "expert" in these matters because the reporters don't know any better.
thepotato232 is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2009, 02:56
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The sky
Posts: 337
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
A320 pitch trim is electric, no hydraulics required.

IIRC the rudder has mechanical backup, so no hydraulics required.

Differential thrust and gravity gear drop complete everything you need to land, apparently the airbus test pilots land in this configuration as their party piece so it is possible.

However, the chances of loosing everything hydraulic when you have three independent systems with yellow and green engine driven pumps (that can operate with a windmilling engine as low as 7% n2), blue and yellow electric pumps, yellow to green (and vice versa) PTU and a blue RAT are, shall we say, slim.

LD
Locked door is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2009, 02:59
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: alameda
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is the rudder really capable of complete manual reversion?

thanks
protectthehornet is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2009, 05:33
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A320 pitch trim is electric, no hydraulics required.

Read your FCOMS! the trimmable horizontal stabilizer (THS) is actuated by the green and yellow hydraulic systems..those two gone, stab is not moving...

Electrically controlled, yes, but hydraulically actuated..if the electrics are gone, the THS may be moved by the wheel manually, but there is still a requirement for hydraulic pressure from at least the green, or yellow system..

Rudder?? requires pressure from at least one of 3 systems..but again, no electrics..

Mechanical backup is a bit of a mis-nomer IMHO, not to be confused with manual reversion

Last edited by ironbutt57; 23rd Oct 2009 at 05:44.
ironbutt57 is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2009, 07:49
  #18 (permalink)  
eez
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: FL---
Age: 52
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ironbutt57 is correct, without all hyd systems on A320 you don't have aircraft control...
eez is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2009, 13:46
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Up north
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thing to remember with the airbus is that it's a BIG difference between loosing pressure (pump) or loosing hydraulic fluid / HYD overheat. Engine driven pump for green system, engine driven pump and ram air turbine for blue and finally engine driven and electrical pump for yellow. Add to that a PTU to transfer pressure between green and yellow. Any one of them operating and you will have control but with limited protections and automatics all depending on which system is operating.

All three gone? I still stand by my point, no control.
CaptainProp is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.