Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Fokker 100 gear-up landing at Stuttgart

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Fokker 100 gear-up landing at Stuttgart

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Sep 2009, 11:57
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: South of North
Age: 53
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F100 SN

Does anyone know what is the MSN for the aircraft concerned ?
Just wondering as it seems similar to the incident with a F100 at Manston some years back where one leg would not come down. It repeated on another occasion on the same ac. It was MSN 11265 (EI-DFZ at the time)

On that occasion the pilot did eventually manage to get the gear down after some tremendous flying. A couple of touch and goes on the extended leg to bump out the un-extended leg.
Just wondering if it is the same a/c.
NFF PLS RTFM is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2009, 12:11
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no, it's 11505
the_hawk is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2009, 18:12
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: In front of the desktop
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes sometimes the F100 does suffer with gear problems amongst other things! However in spite of everything it is a delight to fly and operate and in addition makes my current type appear antiquainted! Has anyone done more than 4hr.40min airborne in a F100 without ferry tanks? I will always remember one of the cabin crew coming into the cockpit whilst in the hold over MSE in a 2G turn asking both of us if we would like a fun size Mars Bar! Three fly bys of the tower and two touch and goes on a unlocked main gear before a return to "three greens". AFCAS mode reversion, dual FMC failure, frozen APU doors, initiation of GA mode whilst locked on the glide! AAAHHH the memories all flooding back now!!
PBD 1 is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2009, 08:21
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: BNE
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
just short of 2yrs as a FA on the F100, during that time had 3 landing gear issues.

1) tug driver in cns attempted to push back while the park brake was still on - apparently a big issue on the F100.

2) approach to syd, gear would not indicate safe. tower couldnt confirm it was down. flew around for 20mins with pilots doing a few interesting manouvres to try and force it down. Pilots told us to be prepared for anything. They apparently couldn't find the problem, but flew the a/c to bne gear down and empty to be safe.

3) Tyre blew on takeoff doing a bit of damage along the way on t/o from norfolk island. Circled, landed, got everyone out on the rwy.
ozangel is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2009, 08:44
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Switzerland, Singapore
Posts: 1,309
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, tug accident and tyre incident surely aren't a type specific problem. Of course a Fokker is never as reliable as an Airbus or a Boeing, but you cannot compare those, you have to compare them with regional aircraft and other 100-seater, like the Embraers, Bombardiers, MDs aso.

I agree that we have some issues on the gear. Our dispatch reliabilty is sometimes higher than those from the Airbusses from the mainline (same MRO).

Dani
(a few 1000 hrs on type)
Dani is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2009, 14:13
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Jordan
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No Matter of what happend !! Atleast they just can open the doors and escape ,
Nimer767 is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2009, 16:30
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cippenham
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Intresting to see that the aircraft was due to fly from Stuttgart to Woenstrecht this afternoon, only what 11 days since the incident,

8000ft is was due to fly at anyone know if it had arrived.
LHRops is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2009, 12:40
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not being horrible, but...

1) tug driver in cns attempted to push back while the park brake was still on - apparently a big issue on the F100.
It is in any aircraft.

2) approach to syd, gear would not indicate safe. tower couldnt confirm it was down. flew around for 20mins with pilots doing a few interesting manouvres to try and force it down. Pilots told us to be prepared for anything. They apparently couldn't find the problem, but flew the a/c to bne gear down and empty to be safe.
There are three gear down indicators - Greens, Gear disgree MFDU message and EPGWS. Do you know which one yours was? From memory, the only one worth getting excited about is Nose/L Gear/R LG unsafe. The rest are non-events.

3) Tyre blew on takeoff doing a bit of damage along the way on t/o from norfolk island. Circled, landed, got everyone out on the rwy.
Did you catch fire then?

PM
Piltdown Man is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2009, 19:53
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Zummerset
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was an issue a few years ago where main wheels would fall off (usually on take off) which was put down to an incorrect method of refitting wheels after wheel replacement. There should have been a shim placed on the axle and this was omitted, with at least two incidents in my company alone.

This was cleared up with a service bulletin from Fokker Services and we have had no other such trouble since.
Stop Stop Stop is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2009, 00:04
  #50 (permalink)  
See and avoid
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 690
Received 37 Likes on 21 Posts
Not a pro, so fear to tread on this thread...

Friction between several tons of metal and a hard surface.
In my opinion, that would be more than enough to generate sparks.

As to it being bits of aluminum causing the sparks?

Flint on steel is a classic way to light a fire, or rock striking rock to create a spark.

What is more important is why the landing gear didn't deploy.
visibility3miles is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.