Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

KE 773 landing incident at NRT

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

KE 773 landing incident at NRT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Jul 2009, 17:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KE 773 landing incident at NRT

Incident: Korean B773 at Tokyo on Jul 13th 2009, tail strikes on landing

BBC NEWS | Special Reports | Korea plane lands on its tail

Aircraft was HL 7532.

Last edited by akerosid; 13th Jul 2009 at 18:25. Reason: Wrong link ...d'oh!
akerosid is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2009, 17:48
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: off-airport
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crikey! Is it just me or does this remind anyone else of Fedex? The video doesn't show it, but it would be interesting to see whether the nose-gear bounced after a first hit on the ground....
rwy_hdg is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2009, 18:26
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I can see of the footage on the BBC report, the nosegear doesn't get involved at all until the rollout and there doesn't seem to be any evidence of a bounce.
akerosid is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2009, 18:44
  #4 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,152
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
It does look as if the nose gear did not touch down before an unfortunate combination of wind and events lifted the nose very high. The BBC web page informs us:
A plane carrying 380 passengers had a bumpy landing in Japan.
Unless I have misunderstood the config of a 773, I suspect that the arrival of an a/c called the '380' has got in to the BBC's auto-story generator software ...
PAXboy is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2009, 18:48
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Frankfurt
Age: 48
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mhh,
the video looks more like a V-MU test than a landing to me...
CptRegionalJet is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2009, 19:23
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,410
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CX has 380 pax on its 773 with no F/C
BusyB is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2009, 19:38
  #7 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did I miss something? It was simply a tailscrape, people, with no evidence of anything untoward to the nosegear! Because it was:
on landing
at Narita,
does it mean everyone should draw parallels with the Fedex? Simply a tailscrape on landing. I have seen one close up, and startling though it is to witness close by, it is essentially a non-event, and is not likely to lead to hard nosegear touchdown before, or after, the scrape. Some of the remarks seem naive and are better directed to that place where the hysterical aviation kids hang out, not a professionals forum.
Rainboe is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2009, 20:30
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scandinavia
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rainboe..
Did I miss something? It was simply a tailscrape
You must be new around here ;-) Good job this wasn't an Airbus or they'd all be screaming about how dangerous FBW is and drawing tenuous conclusions from Hamburg and Air France and....not to mention Korean pilots, CRM...and how they could all do better in MSFS

fc101 *

yes there is some deep irony in there too....

Last edited by fc101; 13th Jul 2009 at 20:32. Reason: typo
fc101 is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2009, 20:57
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chelan, WA
Age: 48
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You must be new around here ;-) Good job this wasn't an Airbus or they'd all be screaming about how dangerous FBW is and drawing tenuous conclusions from Hamburg and Air France and....not to mention Korean pilots, CRM...and how they could all do better in MSFS
Now that you mention FBW, it is worth noting that the 777, like the A330, is FBW. I wonder if there is a link to AF447....

[/sarcasm]
Mods:
Feel free to delete this post. However, sometimes humor is needed....
einhverfr is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2009, 21:35
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Antonio, TX USA
Age: 62
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Off runway?

The poor angle of the poor quality video looks almost as if tail contact was right of the pavement. There's quite a bit of dust being kicked up.

EDIT: the above is an observation, not speculation.

Last edited by md80fanatic; 13th Jul 2009 at 23:02.
md80fanatic is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2009, 22:24
  #11 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unless you know where the camera was located and know the airport, I don't think you can make any comments about where the scrape occured. Are you seriously suggesting a crew missed the runway? Rather than a sensible discussion taking place on reasons for pitch-up after touchdown causing a scrape, we are getting daft 'shoot from the hip' speculation. If the quantity of smoke leads you to think that they 'landed in the dirt' then you should know a scrape produces prodigious smoke and sparking for a short duration.

Let's keep comment sensible! No simmer theories please! Was it an overzealous attempt to smooth touchdown leading to a strike? Pitch up due to reverse thrust? Poor handling habits? I think only a 777 pilot should speculate likely causes, but 'off the pavement'? Really!
Rainboe is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 05:13
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Smogsville
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A center hydraulic system failure would cause a pitch up with spoiler extension or lack thereof.
SMOC is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 06:30
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was there much of a crosswind? I know the headlines mentioned 60kt winds, if there was a reasonable crosswind component in that then it could have blown the dust cloud to one side, giving the appearance of it being off the runway from the cctv camera.
llondel is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 07:37
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Above 30,000 ft
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was there much of a crosswind? I know the headlines mentioned 60kt winds
I won't get into speculating about anything, except to point out that 60 km/hr is not the same as 60 kt!
gengis is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 09:37
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If only....

It would be very interesting and informative if we were to find out the cause of that dramatic and sudden pitch up...but I doubt that we ever will.
glad rag is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 09:58
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@glad rag
It would be very interesting and informative if we were to find out the cause of that dramatic and sudden pitch up...but I doubt that we ever will.

Yes, my heart goes out to all those on board and their families. I doubt if they will ever find the FDR. Another non-tragic incident for which we will never really have an answer. Speculation is pointless, we must await the outcome of a full investigation.
joojoo is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 10:20
  #17 (permalink)  
The Cooler King
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: In the Desert
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"It would be very interesting and informative if we were to find out the cause of that dramatic and sudden pitch up"

Why?
Farrell is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 12:15
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Far East
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Because, dear Farrell, some of us out there, do 12 to 15 landings a month in this type. This tail scrape, after what looks like a normal touch down ( and I emphasize "what looks like") can shorten ones career dramatically!! This is not a normal thing to happen and would think this may constitute an accident report!!
CDRW is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 12:33
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was at Narita last week. Very gusty crosswind on landing and takeoff a couple of days later!
Anyone know if they EVER plan on making taxiway C into a runway as I believe was the origional plan? It would come in handy at various times of the year!
YWG-JFK is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 13:13
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: World
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
pilot saved the plane or the plane saved the pilot?
Crazyworld is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.