Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Iberia IB-6641 CAT over Amazonas?

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Iberia IB-6641 CAT over Amazonas?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Oct 2008, 12:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Universe
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Iberia IB-6641 CAT over Amazonas?

15 injured when Ibera A340-600 (IB-6641) encounted heavy turbulence over Amazonas. Multiple pax had heavy panic attacks.
dicks-airbus is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2008, 14:41
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Front right seat
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm reluctent to report CAT when flying the -600. Other aircraft might think I'm crying wolf.
divinehover is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2008, 17:06
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: France
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is CAT, and then there IS 'heavy turbulence'.
Source, and circumstances, please?
ChristiaanJ is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2008, 17:51
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ---
Posts: 282
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
to be totally correct it would be "severe turbulence" not heavy. ..and back in my corner..
ray cosmic is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2008, 18:59
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: just above the weather
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was the " heavy or servere " turbulence encountered sudden?...changing level perhaps would have helped.
jetpet is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2008, 21:08
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canary Islands, Spain
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was briefly reported yesterday, but it seems the media blew it a little bit out of proportion in Peru (so what's new).

The airplane landed normally in Jorge Chávez airport in Lima when, 45 minutes before estimated arrival, just as they were initiating landing maneuvers, encountered turbulences that caused some minor injuries to 15 people (including 3 crew, out of the 356 PAX plus 16 crew onboard the A-340/600 IB-6641). Most of them weren't wearing seat belts. (Other sources say 335 PAX and 14 crew).

They were given priority landing and medical personnel was waiting for them to be checked out. It seems that some miscommunication made the emergency personnel think that this was an emergency landing. The crew had simply requested medical assistance for the injured passengers and priority to land so they could be quickly assisted.

They were all discharged at the airport soon afterwards except an italian woman that seemed to have suffered a fracture in a finger (or toe, it's the same word in Spanish, and another source says what she had was a twisted left ankle) and was taken to a hospital.

The landing itself, in spite of heavy winds, was otherwise normal.

The official version by Iberia is that a "medium turbulence" made several catering trays and hand luggage fly around the cabin, hitting some passengers and causing some contusions to PAX and crew.

It seems that some undetermined alarm went off in the aircraft at that time (i.e. windshear), while they were flying over the city of Pucallpa in the amazon region of Ucayali.

The three injured Iberia crew members were later sent to a private clinic to receive medical evaluation and attention.

The version in the Peru press is a bit different, if you rather choose to believe it. They speak of the same thing in general terms (windy, heavy turbulence encountered at beginning of landing), but they claim that 25 people were injured and at least 10 hospitalized in different hospitals and clinics around the area. They speak of broken arms, legs, skull fractures and face injuries of passenger and crew members that were "walking around" in the cabin w/o seat belts.

Yet another Peru news agency, reports it as 8 people sent to hospitals with fractures or contusions (one of them, a baby, not apparently injured but only as a precaution) after 23 received medical attention at the airport. The sources say that all of those sent to hospitals were the ones not wearing seatbelts at the moment it first happened and that the injuries weren't severe.

The period of turbulence lasted some 5 minutes, during which the passengers describe the usual "trays and people (w/o seat belts) flying around the cabin followed by several minutes of "earthquake". A 7 yo child is reported as to have hit the ceiling. Needless to say the PAX was scared sh**less for a while.

Some press in Peru informs:

"Chief for civil security from regional goverment of Callao, general David Llamos Rodriguez, informed that "there was no emergency in the landing, the worst moments happened on the air where, as consecuence of abrupt movement, nearly 15 passengers out of 350 that were traveling in the aircraft were injured"

Acording to coronel Bahamonde, chief of the airport division, "in a few hours the situation was under control and the injured had received the needed medical care to return to normal life after the accident between the capitals of Spain and Peru."

Last edited by justme69; 18th Oct 2008 at 11:54.
justme69 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.